Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:06-cv-00067-GMS

Document 14

Filed 05/03/2006

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : Petitioner, : : v. : : THOMAS L. CARROLL, : Warden, and CARL C. DANBERG, : Attorney General for the State of Delaware, : : Respondents. : ROBERT W. WARRINGTON,

Civ. Act. No. 06-67-SLR

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, respondents move for an extension of time in which to file an answer to the petition. In support thereof, respondents state the following: 1. The petitioner, Robert w. Warrington, has applied for federal habeas relief,

challenging his 2001 conviction by a Superior Court jury for first degree murder, possession of a deadly weapon during the commission of a felony, and first degree conspiracy. D.I. 1. By the terms of the Court's order, the answer is due to be filed on May 8, 2006. 2. Counsel for respondents is currently actively involved in last minute capital litigation

regarding an execution scheduled for May 19. Counsel also has been, and continues to be, working on other cases before this Court, the Third Circuit, and the state courts. Moreover, the two attorney vacancies in the Appeals Division have meant an increased workload overall. In light of the situation, additional time is needed to complete the answer and have it reviewed in the ordinary course of business. 3. Under Habeas Rule 4, the Court has the discretion to give respondents an extension of

Case 1:06-cv-00067-GMS

Document 14

Filed 05/03/2006

Page 2 of 4

time exceeding the 40-day limit in Civil Rule 81(a)(2). Clutchette v. Rushen, 770 F.2d 1469, 147374 & n.4 (9th Cir. 1985); Kramer v. Jenkins, 108 F.R.D. 429, 431-32 (N.D. Ill. 1985). The comment to Rule 4 expressly states that the district court has "the discretion to take into account various factors such as the respondent'workload" in determining the period of time that should be allowed s to answer the petition. 4. 5. This is respondents' first request for an extension of time in this case. Respondents submit that an extension of time to and including June 22, 2006, in

which to file an answer is reasonable. Respondents submit herewith a proposed order.

DATE: May 3, 2006

/s/ Elizabeth R. McFarlan Deputy Attorney General Department of Justice 820 N. French Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-8500 Del. Bar. ID No. 3759

Case 1:06-cv-00067-GMS

Document 14

Filed 05/03/2006

Page 3 of 4

RULE 7.1.1 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have neither sought nor obtained the consent of the petitioner, who is incarcerated and appearing pro se, to the subject matter of this motion.

/s/ Elizabeth R. McFarlan Deputy Attorney General Counsel for Respondents

Date: May 3, 2006

Case 1:06-cv-00067-GMS

Document 14

Filed 05/03/2006

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 3, 2006, I electronically filed a motion for extension of time and attachments with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also hereby certify that on May 3, 2006, I have mailed by United States Postal Service, the same documents to the following non-registered participant: Robert W. Warrington SBI No. 442182 Delaware Correctional Center 1181 Paddock Road Smyrna, DE 19977

/s/ Elizabeth R. McFarlan Deputy Attorney General Department of Justice 820 N. French Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-8500 Del. Bar. ID No. 3759 [email protected]

Case 1:06-cv-00067-GMS

Document 14-2

Filed 05/03/2006

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : Petitioner, : : v. : : THOMAS L. CARROLL, : Warden, and CARL C. DANBERG, : Attorney General for the State of Delaware, : : Respondents. : ROBERT W. WARRINGTON,

Civ. Act. No. 06-67-SLR

ORDER This _____day of _________________________, 2006, WHEREAS, respondents having requested an extension of time in which to file an answer, and WHEREAS, it appearing to the Court that the requested extension is timely made and good cause has been shown for the extension, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondents' answer shall be filed on or before June 22, 2006.

____________________________ United States District Judge