Free Designation of Record on Appeal - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:06-cv—OOO70-KAJ Document 2 Filed O2/O2/2006 Paget of3 _
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
F OR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN RE: )
)
PSA, TNC., ) Case No. 00-3570 (KJC)
a Delaware corporation, )
and affiliates, )
)
Debtors. )
)
)
)
ETS PAYPHONES, TNC., 3
)
Plaintiff, A.CiV. PTO. NO.
)
vs. )
)
AT&T UNIVERSAL CARD, )
)
Defendant. )
)
APPELLANTS DESIGNATION OF RECORD ON APPEAL
Citibank (South Dakota) NA. ("AppeHant"), card issuer and servicer for AT&T
Universal Card accounts, by and through its undersigned counsel, designates the record on
appeal to include the following:
l. The Court’s Docket Report for In re PSA. inc., Case No. 00-3570.
2. The Court’s Docket Report for ETS Payphones. inc. v. AT&T Universal Card,
Adv. No. 0365569.
3. The Complaint to Recover Unauthorized Post-Petition Transfers Pursuant to ll
USC. §§ 549 and 500 [sic] by ETS Payphones, Inc. against AT&T Universal Card (Docket #1).
4. Appelianfs Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Support thereof (Docket #26).
WL; N8229'7 vi {EWNTOE QDOC`)

Case 1:06-cv—OOO70-KAJ Document 2 Filed O2/O2/2006 Page 2 of 3
5. Brief in Response by ETS Payphones, Inc. to Appellants Motion for Summary
Judgment (Docket #27).
6. Appellant’s Brief in Reply to Brief in Response by ETS Payphones to Appellanfs
Motion for Sunirnary Judgment (Docket #30).
7. Transcript of hearing on Appellanfs Motion for Summary Judgment held on
September 27, 2005.
8. Memorandum Of Opinion And Order (Docket #49).
9. Order dated December 28, 2005 denying Appellanfs Motion for Suniniary
Judgment (Becket #50).
l0. Notice Of Appeal (Docket #51).
STATEMENT OF ISSUES ON APPEAL
Citibank (South Dakota) NA. (“Appellant"), card issuer and sewicer for AT&T
Universal Card accounts, by and through its undersigned counsel, designates the issues on appeal
to include the following:
I. Whether ETS Payphones, Inc. may recover allegedly unauthorized post—petition
transfers under ll U.S.C. §§ 549 and 550:
a. Whether the legal requirements of operating as a debtor~in~possession
imposed by 28 USC. §959 preclude ETS Payphones, Inc. from recovering allegedly
unauthorized post-petition transfers to Appellant under ll U.S.C. §§ 549 and 550; andfor
la. Whether principle of equity should operate to prevent avoidance and/or
recovery of the allegedly unauthorized posupetition transfers.
2
tre; $182297 vl (sw2vTo11.noC>

Case 1:06-cv—OOO70-KAJ Document 2 Filed O2/O2/2006 Page 3 of 3
Dated: January 17, 2006
Wilmington, Deiaware » _
{ S K7
PEPPER HAMILTON LLP
David M. Fournier (Ne. 2812}
James C. Carignan (N0. -4230}
13 I3 N. Market Street, Suite 5100
P.O. Box 1709
Wikmingmn, DE 19899% 709
(302) 777-6509
- and —
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
John W. McClelland MO #32607
David A. Jermama MO #51389
Benjamin R. Preli MO #55654
2345 Grand Beuievard, Suite 2000
Kansas City, Missouri 64108·-2617
(SE6) 2216-420
(S E6) 221 ~(}786 (facsimiie)
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
3
WL: 53 82297 v2 (30/NTOÂ¥Y.DOC)