Free Proposed Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 77.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 583 Words, 3,575 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/36489/36.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of Delaware ( 77.7 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :06-cv-00270-SLR Document 36 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
)
RED SONJA LLC, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) C.A. No. 06-270 SLR
)
PARADOX ENTERTAINMENT, INC., )
)
Defendant. )

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER `
The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, move this Court to amend all
remaining dates in the Schedule as most recently set forth in the July 12, 2006 Scheduling Order,
as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Pre-Discovery Disclosures. The parties have exchanged the information
required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l) and D. Del. LR 16.2.
2. Discovery.
(a) Discovery will be needed on the following subjects: trademark
infringement and unfair competition issues and damages.
(b) All fact discovery shall be commenced in time to be completed by
December 1, 2006.
(c) Maximum of 25 interrogatories by each party to any other party.
(d) Maximum of 50 requests for admission by each party to any other party.

Case 1:06-cv-00270-SLR Document 36 Filed O9/19/2006 Page 2 ot 3
(e) Maximum of twelve (12) depositions by plaintiff and twelve (l2) by
defendant. Depositions of witnesses within the parties’ control shall be held in either
Philadelphia, Pemrsylvania or Wilmington, Delaware as the parties may agree.
(f) Each deposition limited to a maximum of seven (7) hours unless extended
by agreement of the parties.
(g) Expert discovery shall be commenced in time to be completed by March
14, 2007.
(h) Reports from retained experts under Rule 26(a)(2) on issues for which any
party has the burden of proof due by January 22, 2007. Rebuttal expert reports due by
February 12, 2007.
(i) Discovery Disputes. Any discovery dispute shall be submitted to the
court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. During the course of discovery, each party is limited to
two (2) Rule 37 motions. The court shall make itself available, however, to resolve through a
telephone conference, disputes that arise during the course of a deposition and disputes related to
entry of a protective order.
3. Joinder of Other Parties and Amendment of Pleadings. All motions to join
other parties and amend the pleadings were tiled on September l, 2006.
4. Settlement Conference. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, this matter was referred to
Magistrate Judge Thynge for the purposes of exploring ADR.
5. Applications by Motion. Any application to the court shall be by written motion
filed with the clerk. Unless otherwise requested by the court, counsel shall not deliver copies of
2

Case 1:06-cv-00270-SLR Document 36 Filed O9/19/2006 Page 3 of 3
papers or correspondence to chambers. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the l
statement required by D. Del. LR 7.1.1.
6. Motions in Limine. All motions in limine shall be filed on or before March 5,
2007. All responses to said motions shall be filed on or before March 12, 2007.
7. Pretrial Conference. A pretrial conference will be held on April _, 2007 at
in courtroom 6B, sixth floor Federal Building, 844 King Street, Wilmington, Delaware.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and D. Del. LR 16.4 shall govern the pretrial conference.
8 Trial. This matter is scheduled for a nine (9) day non—jury trial commencing on
May _, 2007 in courtroom 6B, sixth floor Federal Building, 844 King Street, Wilmington,
Delaware. The parties agree to waive their right to trial by jury. For purposes of completing
pretrial preparations, the parties should plan on being allocated a total number of hours in which
to present their respective cases. _
United States District Judge
3