Free Status Report - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 216.2 kB
Pages: 5
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 985 Words, 6,459 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/36496/8.pdf

Download Status Report - District Court of Delaware ( 216.2 kB)


Preview Status Report - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:06-cv-00274-GMS

Document 8

Filed 01/19/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

CHRISTINA LIEF F/B/O TASHA LIEF, Plaintiff, vs. CAPE HENLOPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT and the DELAWARE DEPARTMENT of EDUCATION, Defendants. JOINT STATUS REPORT. Pursuant to the Court's Order of January 10, 2007 (D.I. 06-274), the parties submit the following joint status report. 1. Jurisdiction and Service. Civil Action No. 06-274-GMS

The parties agree that this Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of, and the parties to, this action. Plaintiff believes that no additional parties remain to be served. Defendant Cape Henlopen School District believes that it has not been properly served process in the instant matter. 2. Substance of the Action. a. Plaintiff's Statement:

The factual bases for the claims are set forth in the six day transcript. Plaintiff claims the Defendants denied the child FAPE as defined in Delaware and federal statutory law. As a result of this failure, parent was required to place the child at an out of state educational facility and seeks reimbursement for these costs. Plaintiff alleges IEP irregularities and that Defendant operated so as to deny the student a meaningful benefit from her education.

DB02:5718377.1

065031,1006

Case 1:06-cv-00274-GMS

Document 8

Filed 01/19/2007

Page 2 of 5

b.

Defendants' Statement: Defendants deny that they violated the

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 ("Section 504"), 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ("Section 1983"), Chapter 31 of Title 14 of the Delaware Code, and/or any of the aforementioned statutes' implementing regulations. Defendants further deny that Plaintiff is entitled to any relief of the relief requested. Despite the Plaintiffs claims to the contrary, the Due Process Hearing Panel (DE DP 05-26) was impartial, appropriately conducted the multi-day hearing in the instant matter, appropriately weighed the testimony of the witnesses and the documentary evidence, appropriately applied the relevant law to the facts of the case, and correctly determined that the Cape Henlopen School District did not commit any of the procedural errors alleged by Plaintiff, and furthermore, that it had provided Tasha Lief with a free appropriate public education ("FAPE"). Therefore, Defendants assert that the Due Process Hearing Panel's decision to deny

Plaintiffs requested relief was entirely proper, is entitled to substantial deference, and should be affirmed in all respects. 3. Identification of Issues. Plaintiff. Did the conduct of the Defendant deny student FAPE? Is parent

entitled to reimbursement for placement expenses associated with the child's out of state educational placement? Defendants. Did the Cape Henlopen School District provide Tasha Lief with a

free appropriate public education and, if not, is the Plaintiff entitled to reimbursement expenses relating to her unilateral placement of the student at an out-of-state private school in North Carolina?

2
DB02:5718377., I 065031.1006

Case 1:06-cv-00274-GMS

Document 8

Filed 01/19/2007

Page 3 of 5

4.

Narrowing of Issues. Plaintiff. It is submitted that the factual issues are capable of narrowing by

the parties. Defendants. of the Plaintiff's claims. Relief 5. Plaintiff. Plaintiff seeks compensation for expenses associated with the out The Defendants intend to file dispositive motions with regard to all

of state placement in an educational facility for the student (including housing, travel, school tuition and related school expenses). Defendants. decision. Amendment of the Pleadings6. Plaintiff. Defendants. 7. None at this time. The Defendants do not intend to amend the pleadings at this time. Defendants seek the affirmation of the Due Process Panel's

Joinder of Parties. Plaintiff. None at this time. Defendants. The Defendants do not intend to join additional parties at this time.

Discovery. 8. Plaintiff. Given the exhaustive administrative hearing previously conducted

in this matter, limited discovery may be required (for document production).

3
DB02:57 18377. I 065031.1006

Case 1:06-cv-00274-GMS

Document 8

Filed 01/19/2007

Page 4 of 5

Defendants., Discovery has not yet started. Should Plaintiff request to conduct any discovery in the instant matter, Defendants' shall conduct discovery as to all of the claims and affirmative defenses pled in the Complaint and Defendant's Answer. Defendants also reserve the right to conduct discovery as to any matter upon which Plaintiff conducts discovery. Estimated trial length 9. Plaintiff. Defendants. Jury trial. 10. Neither party has demanded a jury trial. Settlement. 11. Plaintiff. With the addition of new counsel for several of the parties, One full day. Two full days.

settlement negotiation have not yet occurred in earnest. Defendants. No settlement negotiations have occurred.

Other Matters. 12. Plaintiff. Defendants. N/A Because confidential information will have to be exchanged in this

action, the Defendants believe that a protective order will be necessary. The Defendants intend to discuss the form of stipulation and protective order with counsel for Plaintiff and will abide by the Local rules in the interim

4
DB02:5718377.1 065031.1006

Case 1:06-cv-00274-GMS

Document 8

Filed 01/19/2007

Page 5 of 5

13.

Counsel for the parties have conferred about each of the above matters. YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP

BRUCE A. ROGERS & ASSOCIATES

/s/ Bruce A. Rogers Bruce A. Rogers, Esquire (No. 2426) 16 South Front Street P.O. Box 876 Georgetown, DE 19904 (302) 856-7161 Telephone: (302) 856-7176 Facsimile: Email: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff Christina Lief

e (No. 3399) Scott A. Ho rd, Esquire (No. 4461) Michael P. The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street, 17th Floor P.O. Box 391 Wilmington, Delaware 19899-0391 (302) 571-6623; 571-6553 Telephone: (302) 576-3299; 576-3461 Facsimile: Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Cape Henlopen School District

/s/ Craig R. Fitzgerald Craig R. Fitzgerald, Esquire (No. 3730) Deputy Attorney General Civil Division- Kent County 102 West Water Street Dover, Delaware 19904 (302) 739-7641 ext 303 Telephone: (302) 739-7652 Facsimile: [email protected] Email: Attorney for Defendant Delaware Department of Education Dated: January 19, 2007

5
DB02:5718377.1 065031.1006