Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:06-cv—00725-G|\/IS Document 37 Filed 01/07/2008 Page1 of3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
KENNETH S. MITCHELL )
)
Plaintiff, )
v_ 5 Case N0. 06-725 (GMS)
)
WACHOVIA CORPORATION, t/a WACHOVIA )
SECURITIES, WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, )
WACHOVIA SERVICES, INC., WACHOVIA )
BANK OF DELAWARE, N.A., TODD D. )
GAUTHIER, LYNN G. MEYER, CAROLYN J. )
BEAM, and DOROTHY A. DIFEBO, )
J
Defendants. )

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NOW COME the Defendants, by and through their attorneys, Morris, James LLP and
Seyfarth Shaw LLP, and hereby move this Honorable Court for an Order entering summary
judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 in favor of Defendants Wachovia Corporation,
Wachovia Securities, LLC, Wachovia Services, Inc., and Wachovia Bank of Delaware, N.A., as
well as Defendants Todd D. Gauthier, Lynn G. Meyer, Carolyn J. Beam, and Dorothy A.
_ DiFebo.
MORRIS JAMES LLP
P. éarkson Collins, Jr. (#739)
[email protected]
David H. Williams (#616)
[email protected]
James H. McMackin, III (#4284)
[email protected]
500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500
P.O. Box 2306
Wilmington, DE 19899
(302) 888-6800

Case 1 :06-cv—00725-GIVIS Document 37 Filed 01 /07/2008 Page 2 of 3
- and -
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
David Bennet Ross (admitted pro hoc vice)
Devj ani Mishra (admitted pro hczc vice)
Tara Smith Williams (admitted pro hoc vice)
620 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3100
New York, NY 10018
(212) 218-5500
Attorneys for Defendants
Dated: January 7, 2008
2

Case 1:06-cv—00725-G|\/IS Document 37 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
KENNETH S. MITCHELL )
)
Plaintiff, )
v_ g Case N0. 06-725 (GMS)
)
WACHOVIA CORPORATION, t/a WACHOVIA )
SECURITIES, WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, )
WACHOVIA SERVICES, INC., WACHOVIA )
BANK OF DELAWARE, N.A., TODD D. )
GAUTHIER, LYNN G. MEYER, CAROLYN J. ) .
BEAM, and DOROTHY A. DIFEBO, )
J
Defendants. )
__ __________;>
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this day of , 2008, that Defendants’
Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
J.
1648605/1 3