Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 68.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 462 Words, 3,029 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37440/7.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 68.3 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :06-cv-00735-SLR Document 7 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
SKADDEN, Anps, SLATE, M EAGH ER x. F`LOM LLP
FIRMIAFFILIATE OFFICES
no. Box 636 ,,0;,,,,
wt Lmmerom, DELAWARE tease-0636 SSLZZZ?.
TEL: (302) 651-3000 ',§f;,"f’|_'§g
mc, DIAL mx: (302) est-soo n SAN F¤A~¤·S¢¤
moat as n-an 39 www.skadden.eom wASH;;%3;' uci
?$”§ZK‘§‘e..eee. :,;·,¤,;=‘;5;,z
EMAIL ADDRESS HONG KONG
m¤Escnos@sxA¤DEn.coM LONDON
Moscow
MUNICH
PARIS
SINGAPORE
December 15, 2006 1131*12*
TORONTO
BY HAND-DELIVERY
Clerk's Office
United States District Court
for the District of Delaware
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
844 North King Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801 .
Attn.: Francesca Tassone
Re: In re Radnor Holdings Corporation, gal,
Case Number 06-10894 (PJW)
United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware
Radnor Holdings Corporation, g g v. Oiiicial Committee of
Unsecured Creditors of Radnor Holdings Corporation
Appeal Number 06-735 (SLR)
United States District Court, District of Delaware
Dear Ms. Tassone:
On December 14, 2006, the Appellant Debtors in the above-referenced
bankruptcy appeal (the "Appeal") filed the Motion of Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession,
Appellants, to Strike Appellee's Statement of Additional Issues on Appeal and Designation of
Additional Items to be Included in the Record with Respect to Appeal of Order Granting Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors Standing to Prosecute Actions on Behalf of the Debtors’
Estates against Tennenbaum Capital Partners, LLC, Special Value Expansion Fund, LLC,
Special Value Opportunities Fund, LLC, and José E. F eliciano and Related Relief (D.I. 6) (the
"Motion to Strike").
There were a couple of errors in the Motion to Strike as filed. Specifically, the
Motion to Strike did not include certain exhibits that should have been attached to such motion.
In addition, the Motion to Strike indicated that certain unpublished decisions that are otherwise

Case 1 :06-cv-00735-SLR Document 7 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 2 of 2
available on Westlaw were attached thereto. These exhibits, in accordance with Chief Judge
Robinson’s procedures, should not have been referenced in the Motion to Strike.
Accordingly, enclosed herewith is a corrected Motion to Strike, dated December
15, 2006. Ihave also enclosed a disk containing a .pdf version of such corrected motion. Please
replace the Motion to Strike that is currently on the docket of the Appeal with the revised motion
enclosed herewith. Please also correct the docket to reflect a filing date of December 15, 2006.
In accordance with the certificate of service attached to the revised Motion to Strike, the revised
Motion to Strike will be served today.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you need any additional
information, I am available at your convenience.
Re??tfugly,
J . .***1
'•.•¤'° ‘ . · f ' _ ~ yi
Mark L. Desgrosseilliers
Enclosures (2)
479742.0l—Wilmington Server lA - MSW