Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 50.4 kB
Pages: 4
Date: September 8, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 613 Words, 4,026 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37443/139.pdf

Download Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Delaware ( 50.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 139

Filed 05/16/2008

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE POLAROID CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON GROUNDS OF ESTOPPEL AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE OR IN ADDITION, LACHES Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company hereby makes this Motion for Summary Judgment on Grounds of Estoppel and, in the Alternative or in Addition, Laches against Polaroid Corporation, the reasons for which are outlined in Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company's Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on Grounds of Estoppel and, in the Alternative or in Addition, Laches and all supporting memoranda, declarations and exhibits. C.A. No. 06-738-SLR

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 139

Filed 05/16/2008

Page 2 of 3

Dated: May 16, 2008

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ William J. Marsden, Jr. William J. Marsden, Jr. (#2247) Raymond N. Scott, Jr. (#4949) 919 N. Market Street, Suite 1100 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 652-5070 Facsimile: (302) 652-0607 Email: [email protected] CHOATE HALL & STEWART, LLP Robert S. Frank, Jr. Daniel C. Winston Two International Place Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 248-5000 Facsimile: (617) 248-4000 Email: [email protected] [email protected] MINTZ COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C. John E. Giust Matthew C. Bernstein 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92121-3039 Telephone: 858-320-3000 Facsimile: 858-320-3001 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company

2

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 139

Filed 05/16/2008

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 16, 2008, I electronically filed with the Clerk of Court the foregoing document using CM/ECF which will send electronic notification of such filing(s) to the following counsel: Via Email Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) Julia Heaney (#3052) Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, LLP 1201 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 Phone: 302-658-9200 Fax: 302-658-3989 Emails: [email protected]; [email protected] Via Email Russell E. Levine, P.C. Michelle W. Skinner/David W. Higer Maria A. Meginnes/Courtney Holohan/C. Beasley Kirkland & Ellis LLP 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, IL 60601 Phone: 312-861-2000 Fax: 312-861-2200 Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Courtesy Copy Via Federal Express Michelle W. Skinner Kirkland & Ellis LLP 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, IL 60601 Phone: 312-861-2000 Fax: 312-861-2200 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Polaroid Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Polaroid Corporation

/s/ William J. Marsden, Jr. William J. Marsden, Jr.

1

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 139-2

Filed 05/16/2008

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE POLAROID CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON GROUNDS OF ESTOPPEL AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE OR IN ADDITION, LACHES AND NOW, the Court, having considered Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion for Summary Judgment on Grounds of Estoppel and, in the Alternative or in Addition, Laches in this case and all supporting memoranda, declarations and exhibits filed by HewlettPackard Company and Polaroid Corporation's opposition to the motion and all supporting memoranda, declarations and exhibits, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion for Summary Judgment on Grounds of Estoppel and, in the Alternative or in Addition, Laches is GRANTED. SO ORDERED, this ___ day of _________________, 2008. C.A. No. 06-738-SLR

The Honorable Sue L. Robinson