Free Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:06-cv-00737-SLR 2:06-cv-00239-RHC

Document 82 Document 59

12/05/2006 Filed 09/27/2006

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION USA Video Technology Corporation, Plaintiff v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.; COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; COMCAST OF RICHARDSON, LP; COMCAST OF PLANO, LP; COMCAST OF DALLAS, LP Defendants USA VIDEO TECHNOLOGY CORP.'S REPLY TO COMCAST DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS Plaintiff USA Video Technology Corporation ("USVO") responds to the numbered paragraphs of Comcast Defendants' Answer and Counterclaims ("Comcast Defendants") as follows: 1. USVO is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the § § § § § § § § § § § §

Case No.2:06-cv-239 RHC

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

truth of the allegation of paragraph 1 of Comcast Defendants' Counterclaims. 2. USVO is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the

truth of the allegation of paragraph 2 of Comcast Defendants' Counterclaims. 3. USVO is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the

truth of the allegation of paragraph 3 of Comcast Defendants' Counterclaims.

Case 1:06-cv-00737-SLR 2:06-cv-00239-RHC

Document 82 Document 59

12/05/2006 Filed 09/27/2006

Page 2 of 3

4.

USVO is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the

truth of the allegation of paragraph 4 of Comcast Defendants' Counterclaims. 5. USVO admits the allegations in paragraph 5 of Comcast Defendants'

Counterclaims. 6. USVO admits the allegations in paragraph 6 of Comcast Defendants'

Counterclaims. 7. USVO admits the allegations in paragraph 7 of Comcast Defendants'

Counterclaims. 8. USVO admits Comcast Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs restate and reallege

the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1-7 but denies facts therein. 9. USVO denies each and every allegation of paragraph 9 of Comcast Defendants'

Counterclaims. 10. USVO denies each and every allegation of paragraph 10 of Comcast Defendants'

Counterclaims. 11. USVO denies that Comcast Defendants are entitled to any of the relief listed in

Comcast Defendants' prayer for relief. Respectfully submitted, Date: September 27, 2006 /s/ Edward W. Goldstein Edward W. Goldstein Texas Bar. No. 08099500 GOLDSTEIN, FAUCETT & PREBEG, LLP 1177 West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, TX 77027 Tel: 713/877-1515 Fax: 713/877-1737 E-mail: [email protected]

2

Case 1:06-cv-00737-SLR 2:06-cv-00239-RHC

Document 82 Document 59

12/05/2006 Filed 09/27/2006

Page 3 of 3

T. John Ward, Jr. State Bar No. 00794818 Law Office of T. John Ward, Jr., P.C. P.O. Box 1231 Longview, Texas 75606-1231 (903) 757-6400 (telephone) (903) 757-2323 (facsimile) E-mail: [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF Of Counsel: GOLDSTEIN, FAUCETT & PREBEG, L.L.P Corby R. Vowell Texas Bar No. 24031621 1177 West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77027 (713) 877-1515 ­ Telephone (713) 877-1737 ­ Facsimile

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on September 27, 2006. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class U.S. mail.

/s/ Edward W. Goldstein_____ Edward W. Goldstein

3