Free Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:06—cr—00141-SLR Document 10 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 1 of 2 ‘
J IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
L FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
Plaintiff, g
v. J Criminal Action No. 06- IL! I _
JESUS SALINAS—ESCAM1LLA, g
Defendant. J I
INDICTMENT J
The Grand Jury for the District of Delaware charges that:
COUNT ONE
On or about December 4, 2006, in New Castle County, in the State and District of Delaware,
Defendant Jesus Salinas-Escamilla, a citizen and national of Mexico, knowing and in reckless
disregard of the fact that certain aliens had come to, entered and remained in the United States in
violation of law, did transport, move, and attempt to transfer and move such aliens within the United
States by means of transportation and otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law, for the
purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain.
All in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section l324(a)(l)(A)(ii) & (a)(l)(B)(i).
NOTICE OF FORFEITURE
Upon conviction ofthe offense alleged in Count I of this Indictment, Defendant Jesus Salinas-
Escamilla, shall forfeit to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(6), and 8 U.S.C. §
l324(b) & 28 U.S.C. § 246l(c), all conveyances used in the commission of the violation; all
property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived from or is traceable to proceeds obtained
directly or indirectly from the commission of the offense; and all property, real or personal, that was

__V,. · " Case 1:06-cr-00141-SLR Document 10 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 2 of 2 `
used to facilitate, or was intended to be used to facilitate the commission of the offense, including
but not limited to the following:
• $1195 in United States currency;
• A 1996 GMC C-1500 Sierra Series truck.
If any ofthe above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission ofthe defendant:
(a) camiot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or
deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; (d) has been
substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been comrningled with other property which cannot be
divided without difficulty; it is the intent ofthe United States, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 982(b) and 21
U.S.C. § 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendant up to the value of the
forfeitable property described above.
All pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(6) & (b), 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), 8 U.S.C. § 1324, 28 U.S.C.
§ 2461(c), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2.
A TRUE BILL:
Foreperson T`! _
COLM F. CONNOLLY
UNTTED STATES ATTORNEY
By:
Robert F. Kravetz 2 5
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Dated: December 14, 2006
2