Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 20.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 4, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 477 Words, 2,983 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37509/165.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 20.9 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :06-cv-00774-JJF Document 165 Filed O2/O4/2008 Page 1 of 2
YOUNG C ONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
THE B1u.ND·rw1NE Burtomo
tt)00 WEST STREET, 17TH Ftoon
KAREN L. PMC-ut wrrmmcrcs, orr,ov,mr maui (302) 571-6600
Drmzcr Dm.: (302) 571-5DDt (302)5'l'1·1253 mx
on-trcr wr; (302) srs-3516 po Bax 391 (800)253—223*1(DE ONLY)
k1¤0500l0@Y¤51-0001 Wrtmmorow, DELAWARE i9899»D39l WWW-Y0¤¤§000¤)V¤Y·¤0m
February 4, 2008
BY E-FILING AND HAND DELIVERY
The Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
United States District Court
844 King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Reliant Plmrrzzaceziricals, Inc. v. Pm·Pha:·12rczceztticaI, Inc.,
CA. No. 06-774-JJF
Dear Judge Farnan:
We write on behalf of Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. ("Par") in response to the February 1, I
2008 letter (D.1 163) submitted on behalf of Reliant Pharmaceuticals, lnc. ("Reliant") concerning
ReEiant’s renewed motion to disqualify Par’s lead counsel, Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP
(“FLl-I") (D.1. 86). Re1iant’s February 1 letter rehashes arguments made in its unwarranted H
January 3, 2008 post—motion letter to the Court (D.1. 138) and underscores the tactical motivation
behind Re1iant’s unmerited disqualification motion—to delay the resolution of this case. Par
respectfully requests that the Court disregard Re1iant’s letter.
As with its January 3 letter, Reliar1t’s February 1 letter mischaracterizes Par’s current
discovery requests in a belated and legally—flawed attempt to supplement Re1iant’s motion to
disqualify FL1-1 for work it allegedly performed over four years ago. Par respectfully directs the
Court’s attention to Par’s papers in opposition to Reliant’s disqualiication motion (D.1. 99-111)
and Par’s January 7, 2008 letter (D.1. 140) in response to Re1iant’s January 3 letter, which amply
support denial of Reliant’s motion.
Reliant’s January 3 and February 1 letters add nothing to the record on the pending
motion and should not be considered. If the Court, however, believes these letters raise new
issues relevant to the determination of Re1iar1t’s disqualification motion, Par respectfully requests
that it be given an opportunity to address those issues.
Respectfully submitted,
Y A A
,,56/%% Z
Karen L. Pascale (No. 2903)
DB02:655i240.E ussnwinui

Case 1:06-cv-00774-JJF Document 165 Filed O2/O4/2008 Page 2 of 2
Youno CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
The Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
February 4, 2008
Page 2
cc; Clerk ofthe Court (by hand delivery)
Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esquire (by CM/ECP and hand delivery)
Maryellen Noreika, Esquire (by CM/ECF and hand delivery)
Gerald J. Flartmann, Jr., Esquire (by CM/ECF and e-mail)
Edgar H. Haug, Esquire (by e-mail)
James K. Stronski, Esquire (by CM/ECF and e-mail)
John G. Taylor, Esquire (by CM/ECF and e-mail)
Jolm B. Harris, Esquire (by e-mail)
DB02:655l240.l 0660391001