Free Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE KEURIG, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC., TASSIMO CORPORATION, and KRAFT FOODS INC., Defendants. PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER Volume I OF II Civil Action No. 07-017-GMS REDACTED ­ PUBLIC VERSION

YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP John W. Shaw (No. 3362) Karen E. Keller (No. 4489) The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street, 17th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 571-6600 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Keurig, Incorporated

POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP

Richard L. Horwitz (No. 2246) David E. Moore (No. 3983) Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 984-6000 [email protected] [email protected]

Attorneys for Defendants Kraft Foods Global, Inc., Tassimo Corporation, and Kraft Foods Inc. Of counsel: David M. Schlitz William S. Foster, Jr. C. John Brown BAKER BOTTS LLP 1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20004 (202) 639-7700

Of counsel: Michael A. Albert Michael N. Rader Charles T. Steenburg WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C. 600 Atlantic Ave. Boston, MA 02210 (617) 646-8000

DB02:7176667.1

065927.1001

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 2 of 7

This matter having come before the Court at a pretrial conference to be held on September 22, 2008 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 16, and John W. Shaw and Karen E. Keller of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, 1000 West Street, 17th Floor, Wilmington, DE 19801, (302) 571-6600; as well as Michael A. Albert, Michael N. Rader, and Charles T. Steenburg of Wolf Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., 600 Atlantic Ave., Boston, MA 02210, (617) 6468000 having appeared as counsel for plaintiff Keurig, Incorporated ("Keurig") and David E. Moore of Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor, Wilmington, DE 19899, (302) 984-6000, as well as David M. Schlitz and William S. Foster, Jr. of Baker Botts LLP, 1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20004, (202) 639-7700 having appeared as counsel for defendants Kraft Foods Global, Inc., Tassimo Corporation, and Kraft Foods Inc. (collectively "Kraft"), the following actions were taken: (1) This is an action by Keurig for patent infringement, including a claim for willful infringement, and the jurisdiction of the Court is involved under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338. Kraft has filed counterclaims for declaratory judgment of noninfringement and invalidity.1 Jurisdiction is not disputed with respect to Kraft Foods Global, Inc. and Tassimo Corporation. Keurig seeks damages adequate to compensate for Kraft's alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,607,762, including prejudgment and post-judgment interest and costs. Keurig also seeks treble damages and attorneys fees. Keurig further seeks permanent injunctive relief. Kraft seeks attorneys fees. (2) The following stipulations and statements were submitted and are attached to and made a part of this Order.

1

Kraft has moved for leave to amend its answer and counterclaims to assert inequitable conduct. (D.I. 81). Keurig has opposed Kraft's motion for leave to amend. (D.I. 94).

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 3 of 7

(a)

A comprehensive stipulation or statement of all uncontested facts, which will become a part of the evidentiary record in the case, and which may be read to the jury by the Court or any party, is attached as Exhibit 1.

(b)

Keurig's statement of the contested issues of fact and law is attached as Exhibit 2. Kraft's statement of the contested issues of fact and law is attached as Exhibit 3.

(c)

The parties' consolidated exhibit list is attached as Exhibit 4, including columns for the parties' objections. The parties reserve the right to use additional exhibits as needed for impeachment purposes. In addition, each party reserves the right to use exhibits already listed by the other party in any way consistent with the rules of evidence. Demonstrative Exhibits: The parties will provide each other with advance copies of demonstrative exhibits no later than 8:00 PM the day before such demonstratives are used. Kraft plans to use a Kenco Brewer with a rig (DTX040) to brew a beverage using Kenco Singles cartridges produced on both the Lambert and Rychiger lines. Keurig objects to this proposed demonstration for the same reasons that Keurig objects to Kraft offering testimony or documentary evidence regarding the rig apparatus or testing performed thereon. See Keurig's Motion in Limine No. 1 (D.I. 108, attached as Exhibit 16 to this Pretrial Order). Opening Statements: The parties will provide notice to one another, by 11:00 PM on Tuesday, October 21, 2008 (i.e., two days before the start of trial), of all exhibits or demonstrative exhibits proposed for use during opening statements.

-2-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 4 of 7

(d)

Lists of names and addresses of the potential witnesses to be called by each party are attached hereto as follows: (i) (ii) Keurig's witness list is attached as Exhibit 5. Kraft's witness list is attached as Exhibit 6.

Will Call Witnesses: The parties agree to disclose the identity of each witness to be called from their "Will Call" lists no later than 5:00 PM on the day before the witness is called to the witness stand. May Call Witnesses: To the extent that witnesses from the parties' "May Call" lists are called to testify as part of the parties' cases-in-chief, the parties agree to disclose the identity of each such witness no less than seven (7) calendar days before the witness is called to the witness stand. (e) The parties could not agree on a stipulation setting forth the qualifications of each expert witness in such form as could be read to the jury. Accordingly, attached as Exhibit 7 is a document setting forth each party's brief statement as to the qualifications of its own experts (f) Lists of all depositions, or portions thereof, to be read or played into evidence, and statements of any objections or counter-designations thereto are attached as follows: (i) Keurig's designations of deposition testimony, Kraft's counterdesignations and objections, Keurig's objections to Kraft's counterdesignations, and Kraft's responses thereto, are attached as Exhibit 8.

-3-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 5 of 7

(ii)

Kraft's designations of deposition testimony, Keurig's counterdesignations and objections, Kraft's objections to Keurig's counterdesignations, and Keurig's responses thereto, are attached as Exhibit 9.2

(g) (h)

An itemized statement of special damages is not applicable to this action. Waivers of any claims or defenses that have been abandoned by any party: Asserted Claims: Keurig originally asserted infringement of claims 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 of the `762 patent. In the interest of streamlining the trial, however, Keurig is withdrawing all but claim 1. Defenses: Kraft no longer asserts its marking defense under 35 U.S.C. § 287(a).

(i)

The parties provide the following: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Keurig's Trial Brief is attached as Exhibit 10. Kraft's Trial Brief is attached as Exhibit 11. The parties' proposed jury instructions are attached as Exhibit 12. Keurig's proposed verdict form is attached as Exhibit 13. Kraft's proposed verdict form is attached as Exhibit 14. (v) The parties' list of the questions they request the Court to ask prospective jurors in accordance with Rule 47(a) and D. Del. LR 47.1(a) is attached as Exhibit 15.

(j) (k)

Not applicable. Early in the case the parties discussed the possibility of convening a settlement meeting or mediation but did not do so. In advance of trial, the parties have agreed to recommence settlement negotiations.

2

Kraft reserves the right to respond to Keurig's objections and object to Keurig's counterdesignations by September 8, 2008. Keurig agrees. -4-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 6 of 7

(l)

Discovery closed on April 1, 2008. (D.I. 34). Kraft states as follows: Kraft identified new fact witnesses after the end of fact discovery, but more than three months prior to trial, and has offered to make these witnesses available for deposition at a location convenient to Keurig. Keurig responds: Kraft's lateidentified witnesses should be excluded for the reasons set forth in Keurig's Motion in Limine No. 4. (D.I. 111, attached as Exhibit 19 to this Pretrial Order).

(m)

All motions in limine have now been fully briefed. The following motions in limine have been filed and are attached as exhibits hereto: Keurig's Motion in Limine No. 1 ­ Motion to Preclude Kraft From Offering Evidence of its Testing of Singles Cartridges Because Kraft Withheld Key Information About That Testing (D.I. 108) is attached (together with Kraft's opposition (D.I. 123) and Keurig's reply (D.I. 131)) as Exhibit 16. Keurig's Motion in Limine No. 2 ­ Motion to Preclude Kraft's Expert From Testifying About Kraft's Testing of Singles Cartridges (D.I. 109) is attached (together with Kraft's opposition (D.I. 120) and Keurig's reply (D.I. 132)) as Exhibit 17. Keurig's Motion in Limine No. 3 ­ Motion to Preclude Kraft From Introducing Purported Production Records and Other Documents Not Qualifying For the Business Records Hearsay Exception (D.I. 110) is attached (together with Kraft's opposition (D.I. 121) and Keurig's reply (D.I. 133)) as Exhibit 18. Keurig's Motion in Limine No. 4 ­ Motion to Preclude Kraft From Calling Witnesses Identified After the Close of Discovery (D.I. 111) is attached (together with Kraft's opposition (D.I. 122) and Keurig's reply (D.I. 136) as Exhibit 19. Keurig's Motion in Limine No. 5 ­ Motion to Preclude Kraft From Relying on Defenses Identified After the Close of Discovery (D.I. 117) is attached (together with Kraft's opposition (D.I. 124) and Keurig's reply (D.I. 137) as Exhibit 20. Kraft's Motion in Limine to Limit Expert Testimony of Dr. Alexander Slocum (D.I. 106) is attached (together with Keurig's opposition (D.I. 118) and Kraft's reply (D.I. 134)) as Exhibit 21.

-5-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 7 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 1 of 259

EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 2 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 3 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 4 of 259

EXHIBIT 2

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 5 of 259

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE KEURIG, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC., TASSIMO CORPORATION, and KRAFT FOODS INC., Defendants. EXHIBIT 2: KEURIG'S STATEMENT OF CONTESTED ISSUES OF FACT AND LAW Civil Action No. 07-017-GMS

INFRINGEMENT ­ ISSUE OF FACT FOR THE JURY 1. Whether Defendants (collectively "Kraft") infringe claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,607,762

by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling within the United States Tassimo T-Discs having internal filters, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271 (i.e., whether T-Discs having internal filters embody each and every limitation of clam 1 of the '762 patent). VALIDITY ­ ISSUES OF FACT FOR THE JURY 2. Whether any single item of prior art identified in Kraft's Invalidity Contentions discloses

to one of skill in the art each of the limitations of claim 1 of the `762 patent. 3. Whether a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand a "Kenco Singles"

cartridge to have a lid that is (1) capable of being pierced to permit a flow of liquid into the cartridge to brew a coffee beverage and also (2) capable of being pierced to permit the flow of coffee beverage out of the cartridge.

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 6 of 259

4.

Whether Kenco Singles cartridges were available to interested members of the public in

the United States prior to February 18, 1999, or publicly known in the United States prior to February 18, 2000. 5. Whether a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand U.S. Patent No. 4,853,234,

entitled "Beverage Packages," to disclose a cartridge with a lid having a first section overlying the first chamber of the cartridge and a second section overlying the second chamber of the cartridge. 6. Whether a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand U.S. Patent No. 4,853,234,

entitled "Beverage Packages," to disclose a cartridge with a lid that is (1) capable of being pierced to permit a flow of liquid into the cartridge to brew a coffee beverage and also (2) capable of being pierced to permit the flow of coffee beverage out of the cartridge. 7. Whether a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand U.S. Patent No, 4,452,130,

entitled "Electrical Apparatus Useful to Prepare a Hot Beverage," to disclose a cartridge with a lid that is (1) capable of being pierced to permit a flow of liquid into the cartridge to brew a coffee beverage and also (2) capable of being pierced to permit the flow of coffee beverage out. WILLFULNESS ­ ISSUES OF FACT FOR THE JURY 8. Whether Kraft sold T-Discs in the United States despite an objectively high likelihood

that doing so would infringe the `762 patent and that the `762 patent was valid. 9. If such an objectively high risk existed, whether that risk was known to Kraft or so

obvious that it should have been known.

-2-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 7 of 259

DAMAGES ­ ISSUE OF FACT FOR THE JURY 10. What royalty per T-Disc Keurig and Kraft would have agreed upon in a hypothetical

negotiation that (1) assumed the `762 patent covered the filter T-Disc and was valid and enforceable; and (2) concluded shortly before Kraft began selling T-Discs in the United States in September 2005. ISSUES FOR THE COURT 1. Enhanced Damages for Willful Infringement ­ If the jury determines that Kraft

willfully infringed the `762 patent, whether the damages for which Kraft is liable should be trebled or increased in such other amount pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 as the Court deems proper for Kraft's willful infringement. 2. Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and Expenses ­ Whether this case is exceptional under 35

U.S.C. § 285, entitling Keurig to recover attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs. 3. Interest ­ If the jury determines that Keurig is entitled to damages, whether Keurig is

entitled to pre-judgment interest, and the amount thereof. 4. Permanent Injunction ­ If the jury determines that Kraft infringed the `762 patent and

rejects Kraft's invalidity defense, whether a permanent injunction should be issued enjoining Kraft from further infringement of the `762 patent based on the factors set forth in eBay v. MercExchange, 547 U.S. 388 (2006).

Dated: August 25, 2008

-3-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 8 of 259

EXHIBIT 3

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 9 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 10 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 11 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 12 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 13 of 259

EXHIBIT 4

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 14 of 259

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE KEURIG, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC., TASSIMO CORPORATION, and KRAFT FOODS INC., Defendants. EXHIBIT 4: EXHIBIT LISTS Civil Action No. 07-017-GMS CONFIDENTIAL ­ FILED UNDER SEAL

Attached are schedules of Joint Trial Exhibits ("JTX"), Plaintiff's Trial Exhibits ("PTX"), and Defendants' Trial Exhibits ("DTX"). Items originally scheduled on both the PTX and DTX lists have been moved to the JTX list.

Dated: August 25, 2008

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 15 of 259

PLAINTIFF'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST (PTX) -- 8/25/08

PTX BEGBATES 1 KEU00103534 2 KEU00104294 3 KEU00104360 4 KEU00104348 5 KEU00104379 6 KEU00104398 7 KEU00104417 8 KEU00103610 9 KEU00103655 10 KEU00103607 11 KEU00104217 14 KEU00104251 15 KEU00103721 17 KEU00104039 23 28 29 30 31 K 0015295 K 0002994 K ED 00102986 SB004354 KEU00108585

ENDBATES KEU00103536 KEU00104296 KEU00104362 KEU00104354 KEU00104381 KEU00104400 KEU00104422 KEU00103654 KEU00103672 KEU00103609 KEU00104219 KEU00104273 KEU00103790 KEU00104043

DESCRIPTION

DATE 9/27/2001 t 7/30/2007 7/30/2007 7/26/2002 7/30/2007 7/30/2007 6/12/2002 7/29/2003 3/13/2000 3/13/2000 7/29/2003 6/30/2000 7/22/2003 5/17/2004 9/6/2004

DEPONENT

DEPO EXHIBIT NO

Def.'s Objections

32 KEU00109048 33 KEU00109051 34 KEU00109034 35 KEU00109043 36 KEU00108581 37 38 39 40 41 KEU00108588 KEU00109059 KEU00108977 KEU00109009

K 0015317 K 0003003 K ED 00103043 SB004405 KEU00108587 Article How Elasticity of Demand Affects Total Revenue Article Kraft wakes up to need to push Maxwell House After falling behind to KEU00109050 P&G's Folgers boosts spending to $60 million KEU00109055 Article Kraft's search for the right ingredients Article Kraft's Tassimo coffee system aims to sell beans, not the machines; Product key to whether it can innovate and raise prices in other categories Article Kraft's Tassimo System set to Land on U.S. Shores Article Licensing Economics Review The Royalty Rate Journal of Intellectual Property Article Litigation Services Handbook, The Role of the Financial Expert (pp. 16 17) Article One cup machines making it Article Q1 2005 Kraft Foods Earnings Conference Call Final Article Q2 2005 Kraft Food Earnings Conference Call Final Article Q4 2005 Kraft Food Earnings Conference Call Final

8/9/2006 Hansen 7/27/2007 Hansen

PX147 PX148 Hearsay

5/2/2005 10/6/2004

Hearsay Hearsay

KEU00109036 KEU00109044 KEU00108583 KEU00108590 KEU00109060 KEU00109008 KEU00109033

4/4/2005 3/21/2005 12/00/2005

Hearsay Hearsay

12/11/2007 4/19/2005 8/2/2005 Deromedi 2/21/2006

Hearsay Hearsay PX179 Hearsay

1

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 16 of 259

PLAINTIFF'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST (PTX) -- 8/25/08

PTX BEGBATES 42 KEU00109056 43 KEU00108964 44 KEU00109037 45 46 47 K 0003954 48 49 KEU00109045 50 51 52 KEU00105172 53 KEU00105168

ENDBATES KEU00109058 KEU00108976 KEU00109042

K 0003955 KEU00109047

DESCRIPTION Article Toronto Star article on Tassimo Article Trends in Patent Damages (McGrath and Kedrowski) Article Why this $169 machine matter to Kraft..... Article Pages 7 8 from The Basics of Brewing Coffee (Ex. D to Lingle Expert Report) Article Companies International: Kraft Cooks up Strategic Innovations Article Is Single Serve Coffee Finally Ready to Brew? Article Kraft Foods at Consumer Analyst Group of New 2006 Conference Article Kraft Foods Debuts Tassimo Hot Beverage System in the U.S. Article Kraft Looking for Magical Brew: Food giant prepares to unveil its new coffeemaking system, which uses a special machine and packets of java Article Kraft to Double Patent Lawyers

DATE DEPONENT 5/13/2006 12/11/2005

DEPO EXHIBIT NO

Def.'s Objections Hearsay Hearsay Hearsay Relevance

5/17/2005 8/12/2006 2/21/2006 3/16/2005 Deromedi

Hearsay PX178

2/3/2004 Deromedi 5/11/2005 11/1/2006 3/1/2006

PX177

Hearsay

KEU00105174 KEU00105171

Article

Ongoing Innovations in Single Cup Strengthen OCS Competitive Stance

Hearsay Hearsay

Article Operators and Suppliers Examine Portion Pack Brewing Opportunity Discovery Responses First Set of Materials Referenced in Kraft's Response to 56 K ED 00025867 K ED 00025869 Interrogatory No. 24 Discovery Responses Second Set of Materials Referenced in KFG's Response 57 K ED 00056615 K ED 00056626 to Interrogatory No. 24 Discovery Responses Defendants' Response to Keurig's First Set of Requests for Admission 59 61 K ED 00194464 K ED 00194465 62 K ED 00019205 K ED 00019207 K0014370 63 K0014361 K0012602 64 K0012602 65 K ED 00039341 K ED 00039342 66 K ED 00124285 K ED 00124286 67 K ED 00055395 K ED 00055397 68 K ED 00008726 K ED 00008726 70 K ED 00021141 K ED 00021141 71 K ED 00115925 K ED 00115925 73 K ED 00193868 K ED 00193869 75 K ED 00024184 K ED 00024184 76 K ED 00056553 K ED 00056554 77 K ED 00039376 K ED 00039377 78 K ED 00122451 K ED 00122451 79 KEU00108000 KEU00108007 n

3/31/2008 10/3/2003 10/15/2003 9/14/2001 Halliday 4/18/2001 Halliday 9/6/2005 11/20/2006 8/11/2004 9/22/2004 7/4/2003 9/16/2005 5/3/2005 12/17/2005 5/20/2005 9/4/2005 Lloyd 8/19/2005 Deromedi 1/17/2001 PX056 PX175

PX033 PX020

2

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 17 of 259

PLAINTIFF'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST (PTX) -- 8/25/08

PTX BEGBATES 80 K ED 00038748 81 K ED 00115671 82 K 0016238 83 K 0016219 84 KEU00108530 85 86 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 KEU00108486 K ED 00115593 K ED 00077218 K ED 00116315 K ED 00108311 K K K K ED ED ED ED 00123799 00040758 00056641 00116807

ENDBATES DESCRIPTION K ED 00038837 K ED 00115672 K 0016238 K 0016220 KEU00108530 KEU00108486 K ED 00115595 K ED 00077235 K ED 00116320 K ED 00108311 K K K K ED ED ED ED 00123799 00040759 00056643 00116830

DATE 9/14/2005 10/20/2005 12/18/2004 4/24/2005 3/7/2006

DEPONENT Deromedi Deromedi Deromedi Deromedi

DEPO EXHIBIT NO PX176 PX183 PX180 PX182

Def.'s Objections

Hearsay Hearsay PX149, PX185, PX189 PX067 PX154 PX195 PX174 PX069 PX151 PX063 PX152 PX129 PX196 PX173 PX168 Hearsay

2/3/2006 4/3/2006 Hansen, Deromedi, Weber 10/6/2006 Lloyd 6/21/2006 10/30/2007 Hansen 6/29/2006 8/4/2005 4/6/2005 3/20/2006 Weber Deromedi Lloyd Hansen

95 K ED 00058094 K ED 00058097 97 K ED 00122470 98 K ED 00025865 99 K ED 00047914 101 K 0016214 102 K ED 00022680 103 KEU00018974 104 K0015976 105 KEU00018945 106 KEU00034882 K ED 00122472 K ED 00025866 K ED 00047916 K 0016215 K ED 00022702 KEU00018974 K0015976 KEU00018945 KEU00034883

5/12/2005 Lloyd 9/22/2005 4/20/2005 3/22/2005 6/16/2005 9/6/2004 4/13/2005 7/15/2005 11/28/2005 8/3/2000 Waks 12/6/2000 4/19/2005 Waks FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary StoneTurn Exhibit 01 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 02 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 03 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 04 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 05 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 06 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 07 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 08 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 09 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 10 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 11 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 12 from Ratliff Report Hansen Waks Weber Deromedi Gogia

Hearsay PX131

107 KEU00032659 KEU00032660 108 K ED 00025879 K ED 00025879 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120

PX127

3

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 18 of 259

PLAINTIFF'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST (PTX) -- 8/25/08

PTX BEGBATES 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 K 0014413 147 K 0014680 148 K0012049 149 K0011885 150 KEU00108026 151 K 0016125 152 K0012236 153 K0012364 154 155 KEU00036208

ENDBATES

DESCRIPTION FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary FRE 1006 Summary (Supplemental) StoneTurn Exhibit 13 (Supplemental) from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 14 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 15 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Exhibit 16 from Ratliff Report (Supplemental) StoneTurn Workpaper 01 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 02 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 03 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 04 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 05 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 06 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 07 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 08 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 09 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 10 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 11 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 12 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 13 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 14 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 15 from Ratliff Report StoneTurn Workpaper 16 (a c) from Ratliff Report

DATE

DEPONENT

DEPO EXHIBIT NO

Def.'s Objections

FRE 1006 Summary

Stone Turn Summary Exhibit 10.1

Foundation (Present with demonstratives) Foundation (Present with demonstratives) Foundation (Present with demonstratives) Foundation (Present with demonstratives) Foundation (Present with demonstratives) Halliday Halliday Halliday Lazaris Weber Halliday Halliday PX032 PX039 PX038 DX201 PX198 PX040 PX041

FRE 1006 Summary

Stone Turn Summary Exhibit 10.2

FRE 1006 Summary

Stone Turn Summary Exhibit 10.3

FRE 1006 Summary

Stone Turn Summary Exhibit 13.1

FRE 1006 Summary K 0014416 K 0014685 K0012235 K0012048 KEU00108027 K 0016129 K0012344 K0012693 KEU00036211 Patent Patent

Stone Turn Summary Exhibit 20.1

European Patent Application No. 04250384.7 Examiner's rejection re Application No. 04250384.7

1/23/2004 12/2/2004

4

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 19 of 259

PLAINTIFF'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST (PTX) -- 8/25/08

PTX BEGBATES 156 KEU00036221 157 KEU00036233 158 KEU00036212 159 160 KEU00036158 161 162 163 164 167 KEU00109108 168 170 171 172 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 KEU00084315 189 KEU00084319 190 KEU00084325 191 KEU00084331 192 KEU00084336 194 195 196 197

ENDBATES KEU00036232 KEU00036244 KEU00036220

DESCRIPTION Patent EP Application Pub. No. 0 272 922 Patent EP Application Pub. No. 0 451 980 Patent Response to examiner's rejection re EP application No. 04250384.7 Patent Communication of Intent to Grant European patent re Application No. 04250384.7 Patent EP 1 440 913 B1 Patent File History for GB Pub No. 2397500 Patent Patent PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability PCT/GB2004/00273 Patent Provisional Patent Application for Beverage Filter Cartridge Patent International Publication No. WO 01/60220 A1 Patent U.S. Patent No. 5,840,189 Patent U.S. Patent No. 5,325,765 Patent Application as Filed for U.S. Serial No. 10/763457 Patent Inventors' Oath for U.S. Serial No. 10/763457 Patent File History for U.S. Patent No. 7,328,651 Photograph Kenco Cartridge Following Slocum/Lingle Kenco Experiment (Lingle Rebuttal Report p. 8) Photograph Liquid Obtained from Slocum/Lingle Kenco Experiment 2 (Lingle Rebuttal Report p. 5) Photograph Liquid Obtained from Slocum/Lingle Kenco Experiment 4 (Lingle Rebuttal Report, p. 6) Photograph Liquid Obtained from Slocum/Lingle Kenco Experiment 5 (Lingle Rebuttal Report p. 7) Photograph Liquid Obtained from Slocum/Lingle Kenco Experiment 8 (Slocum Rebuttal Report p. 26) Photograph Rychiger Experiment before flow (Slocum Rebuttal Report p. 27) Photograph Slocum Clamping Apparatus (Slocum Rebuttal Report p. 24) Photograph Slocum Experiment Beverage exiting through inlet hole on Lambert cartridge (Slocum Rebuttal Report p. 20) Photograph Lambert Experiment with "hypodermic" piercer (Slocum Rebuttal Report p. 27) Photograph Liquid on floor following Slocum experiment (Slocum Rebuttal Report p. 20) Photograph Rychiger Experiment during flow (Slocum Rebuttal Report p. 27); Photograph Slocum Experiment (Slocum Rebuttal Report p. 23) Photograph Model of Cartridge Photograph Model of Cartridge Photograph Model of Cartridge Photograph Model of Cartridge Photograph Model of Cartridge Physical Exhibit Kenco Cartridge (Lambert Line) Physical Exhibit Kenco Mark II Coffee Cartridge Physical Exhibit Kenco Cartridge (Lambert Line) Physical Exhibit Kenco Cartridge (Lambert Line)

DATE DEPONENT 12/22/1987 3/22/1991 6/9/2005 11/17/2005 1/23/2004

DEPO EXHIBIT NO

Def.'s Objections

KEU00036207

KEU00109113

Lazaris 8/23/2001 Halliday 11/24/1998 7/5/1994 1/23/2004 Halliday

DX203 PX037

PX031

KEU00084318 KEU00084324 KEU00084330 KEU00084335 KEU00084339

Macmahon Macmahon Macmahon Glus

PX071 PX081 PX088 PX101

5

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 20 of 259

PLAINTIFF'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST (PTX) -- 8/25/08

PTX BEGBATES 201 BAN0028 202 BAN0029 203 BAN0026 204 BAN0027 205 BAN0030 206 BAN0025 207 208 K ED 00042752 209 KEU00105040 210 K 0004619 212 K ED 00204633 213 K 0002653 214 K 0002454 215 K0011071 216 K0013782 217 K ED 00024095 219 K0005067 220 K0014172 221 K ED 00203796 222 K ED 00195962 223 K ED 00166369 224 K 0013893 225 K ED 00194705 226 K 0015729 230 K ED 00016714 231 KEU00002921 232 BAN 000006 233 K ED 00051374 234 K ED 00116560 236 K ED 00131164 237 K0017963 238 K 0001399 239 K0017905 240 K0017776 241 K 0013990 242 K ED 00130254 244 K 0001868 245 K0012804

ENDBATES BAN0028 BAN0029 BAN0026 BAN0027 BAN0030 BAN0025 K ED 00042785 KEU00105044 K 0004619 K ED 00204635 K 0002721 K 0002544 K0011075 K0013795 K ED 00024118 K0005153 K0014180 K ED 00203836 K ED 00196114 K ED 00166377 K 0013963 K ED 00194713 K 0015868 K ED 00016998 KEU00002954 BAN 000022 K ED 00051440 K ED 00116564 K ED 00131179 K0017978 K 0001404 K0017962 K0017835 K 0013998 K ED 00130257 K 0001920 K0012804

DESCRIPTION Physical Exhibit Physical Exhibit Physical Exhibit Physical Exhibit Physical Exhibit Physical Exhibit Physical Exhibit

DATE Tassimo Cappuccino Foaming Milk Creamer Tassimo Suchard Hot Chocolate Tassimo Gevalia Espresso Tassimo Gevalia Signature Blend Coffee Tassimo Latte Milk Creamer Tassimo: Starbucks Coffee House Blend Ribbon Copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,607,762

DEPONENT

DEPO EXHIBIT NO

Def.'s Objections

6/14/2005 Lloyd, Weber

PX054, PX187

2/22/2005 9/23/2004 4/28/2006 11/21/2003 Halliday Halliday 1/5/2006 Lloyd 3/9/2001 Lloyd 2/17/2004 10/00/2001 10/18/2006 11/29/2002 12/7/2004 4/14/2005 4/4/2005 Hansen, Weber Hansen 3/9/2005 4/5/2006 6/21/2005 5/4/2005 2/6/2002 7/8/2004 1/1/2006 Waks Waks Waks Lloyd Hansen Weber

PX026 PX029 PX051 PX050

PX143, PX188 PX153 PX126 PX128 PX130 PX064 PX144 PX186 PX061 PX142, PX193 PX141

K 0002798 246 K 0002783 247 K ED 00039129 K ED 00039142 248 K ED 00046744 249 KEU00047059 250 BAN000005 251 K0011201 K ED 00046758 KEU00047095 BAN000005 K0011202

5/25/2006 Lloyd 9/15/2005 Hansen, Weber 2/14/2005 Hansen 4/6/2005 Halliday, Weber

PX028, PX199

6

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 21 of 259

PLAINTIFF'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST (PTX) -- 8/25/08

PTX BEGBATES 252 K ED 00026390 253 K ED 00015084 254 KEU00024111 255 K0013796 256 K ED 00070798

ENDBATES DESCRIPTION K ED 00026403 K ED 00015089 KEU00024178 K0013802 K ED 00070801

DATE DEPONENT 01/00/2005 Lloyd 12/17/2004 01/00/2006 12/4/2001 Halliday Lloyd 4/15/2004 5/19/2005 Lloyd, Adam 4/6/2006 1/24/2008 2/27/2000 Lloyd 7/22/2002 Lloyd Halliday 12/14/2005 12/4/2001 11/15/2007 5/6/2003 8/1/2006 03/00/2005 1/8/2008 4/25/2001 Halliday 5/14/2001 Lloyd 6/27/2001 Halliday Halliday 4/17/2002 Halliday Halliday 7/5/2006 6/20/2002 1/27/2004 12/3/2001 Halliday 2/5/2001 Halliday Halliday 5/15/2007 Gogia Gogia Gogia Gogia Gogia 4/19/2004 Lloyd

DEPO EXHIBIT NO PX057

Def.'s Objections Relevance Hearsay

PX035 PX058

257 K ED 00010009 K ED 00010018 258 K ED 00056612 K ED 00056614 259 KEU00103179 260 KEU00104609 261 K0000857 262 K0013981 263 K0013622 KEU00103183 KEU00104617 K0000857 K0013989 K0013626

PX068

PX047 PX052 PX027

264 K ED 00028198 K ED 00028199 266 K ED 00235086 K ED 00235092 267 K ED 00106881 268 KEU00022573 269 K ED 00165276 270 K 0015498 271 KEU00108591 272 K0012953.22 273 K0012593.19 274 K0012629 275 K ED 00009099 276 K0011853 277 K0012603 278 K ED 00091067 280 K ED 00007044 281 K ED 00193994 282 K0012976 283 K0014644 284 K 0012759 286 K0010105 287 KEU00028830 294 K ED 00100797 297 K ED 00100798 298 K ED 00100794 299 K ED 00100796 300 K ED 00100795 301 K 0013513 302 KEU00084373 K ED 00106901 KEU00022575 K ED 00165278 K 0015500 KEU00108592 K0012953.25 K0012593.21 K0012644 K ED 00009099 K0011854 K0012603 K ED 00091073 K ED 00007045 K ED 00193999 K0012976 K0014644 K 0012805 K0010107 KEU00028870 K ED 00100797 K ED 00100798 K ED 00100794 K ED 00100796 K ED 00100795 K 0013513 KEU00084394

Hearsay

PX021 PX055 PX022 PX024 PX036 PX034

PX018 PX019 PX025 Hearsay PX160 PX163 PX165 PX166 PX157 PX065

7

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 22 of 259

PLAINTIFF'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST (PTX) -- 8/25/08

PTX BEGBATES 303 KEU00032652 306 KEU00084395 307 KEU00107902 308 KEU000109170 309 K0009688 310 K ED 00130711 311 312 K 0010077 313 KEU00032296 314 KEU00109123 315 K ED 00111545 316 K ED 00047654 317 K ED 00060256 318 K ED 00100799 319 K ED 00017539 320 K 0015419 321 K ED 00108474 322 KEU00109139 323 KEU00007792 324 KEU00104873 325 KEU00104986 326 KEU00035241 327 KEU00108021 328 KEU00027343 331 332 KEU00108584 333 334 KEU00109127 335 KEU00109126

ENDBATES DESCRIPTION KEU00032657 KEU00084413 KEU00107914 KEU000109174 K0009700 K ED 00130712 K 0010077 KEU00032305 KEU00109125 K ED 00111552 K ED 00047659 K ED 00060261 K ED 00100799 K ED 00017544 K0015420 K ED 00108475 KEU00109169 KEU00007800 KEU00104877 KEU00104986 KEU00035262 KEU00108024 KEU00027346 KEU00108584 SEC Kraft Foods, Inc. 10 Q (quarterly period ending 3/31/08) Web Page "About Flavia" Web Page Diagram of Kenco Coffee Cartridge (from www.kencocoffeecompany.co.uk)

DATE DEPONENT 4/21/2000 1/31/2008 2/15/2001 1/10/2008 Lloyd 7/15/2005 Hansen 7/4/2005 Lloyd 6/5/2007 Lazaris 12/10/2004 Deromedi 4/26/2005 Deromedi 5/25/2005 Deromedi Gogia 10/7/2004 Deromedi Lloyd 9/25/2007 Weber

DEPO EXHIBIT NO

Def.'s Objections

PX062

PX146 PX066 DX213 PX170 PX171 PX172 PX167 PX169 PX060 PX197

2/21/2000 1/4/2008 Beaulieu 3/31/2008

DX238 Hearsay

KEU00109138 KEU00109126

Web Page Web Page

Tassimo Frequently Asked Questions Tassimo Piercing Unit webpage

Foundation (no indication of Website)

8

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 23 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 24 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 25 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 26 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 27 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 28 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 29 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 30 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 31 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 32 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 33 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 34 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 35 of 259

JOINT TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST -- 8/25/08

JTX JTX001 (PTX227, DTX183) JTX002 (PTX218, DTX115) JTX003 (PTX228, DTX116) JTX004 (PTX229, DTX117) JTX005 (PTX060, DTX119) JTX006 (PTX074, DTX108) JTX007 (PTX072, DTX109) JTX008 (PTX211, DTX184) JTX009 (PTX265, DTX149) JTX010 (PTX279, DTX097) JTX011 (PTX096, DTX102) JTX012 (PTX087, DTX205) JTX013 (PTX243, DTX166) JTX014 (PTX289, DTX185) JTX015 (PTX290, DTX186) JTX016 (PTX292, DTX187)

BEGBATES

ENDBATES

DESCRIPTION

DATE

DEPONENT

DEPOEXNO

K ED 00045346 K ED 00045363

4/11/2005 Lloyd

PX049

K ED 00045183 K ED 00045190

04/00/2005

Rowan

PX005

K0008261

K0008266

3/2/2005 Rowan

PX006

K ED 00074844 K ED 00074848

Rowan

PX007

K ED 00016018 K ED 00016019

10/8/2004 Rowan

PX009

K ED 00070908 K ED 00070909

10/10/2005 Rowan

PX010

K ED 00005428 K ED 00005430

5/14/2007 Rowan

PX011

K ED 00046624 K ED 00046661

06/00/2004

Lloyd

PX048

K0004713

K0004733

Lloyd, Hanson, Weber

PX053, PX150, PX191

K0017696

K0017704

10/11/1999 Macmahon

PX075

K ED 00075814 K ED 00075814

11/30/2006 Macmahon

PX080

K ED 00112343 K ED 00112356

2/3/2006 Weber

PX192

K0001090

K0001119

4/1/2006 Hansen

PX145

K ED 00048282 K ED 00048282

3/1/2005 Gogia

PX155

K ED 00048283 K ED 00048283

20/05/0000

Gogia

PX156

K ED 00048284 K ED 00048284

20/06/0000

Gogia

PX158

21

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 36 of 259

JOINT TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST -- 8/25/08

JTX JTX017 (PTX293, DTX188) JTX018 (PTX295, DTX189) JTX019 (PTX296, DTX190) JTX020 (PTX291, DTX191) JTX021 (PTX304, DTX265) JTX022 (PTX235, DTX267) JTX023 (PTX100, DTX201) JTX024 (PTX285, DTX203) JTX025 JTX026 (PTX166, DTX025) JTX027 (PTX027, DTX177) JTX028 (PTX330, DTX056, DTX303) JTX029 (PTX025, DTX171) JTX030 (PTX024, DTX172) JTX031 (PTX026, DTX173) JTX032 (PTX022, DTX288)

BEGBATES

ENDBATES

DESCRIPTION

DATE

DEPONENT

DEPOEXNO

K ED 00048285 K ED 00048285

20/06/0000

Gogia

PX159

K ED 00048286 K ED 00048286

20/07/0000

Gogia

PX161

K ED 00048287 K ED 00048287

20/07/0000

Gogia

PX162

K ED 00048288 K ED 00048288

10/1/2005 Gogia

PX164

KEU00032668

KEU00032676

9/29/2000 Lazaris

DX205

KEU00032715

KEU00032740

7/24/2006 Lazaris

DX234

K ED 00083601 K ED 00083603

2/2/2006 Deromedi, Weber

PX184, PX190

K ED 00086854 K ED 00086967

1/26/2006

KEU00036245

KEU00036336

2/13/2001

K0018279

K0018299

KEU00108818

KEU00108963

SEC Kraft Foods, Inc. 10 K (annual period ending 12/31/06)

12/31/2006

K0015318

K0015369

12/1/2002

K0015370

K0015394

5/23/2003

K0015408

K0015461

4/13/2006

KEU00103226

KEU00103274

8/13/2003

22

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 37 of 259

JOINT TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST -- 8/25/08

JTX JTX033 (PTX020, DTX289) JTX034 (PTX019, DTX290) JTX035 (PTX018, DTX291) JTX036 (PTX016, DTX292) JTX037 (PTX012, DTX293) JTX038 (PTX013, DTX296) JTX039 (PTX021, DTX300) JTX040 (PTX193, DTX279) JTX041 (PTX288, DTX170) JTX042 (PTX054, DTX013) JTX043 (PTX055, DTX017) JTX044 (PTX058, DTX021) JTX045 (PTX165, DTX024) JTX046 (PTX169, DTX030) JTX047 (PTX198, DTX037) JTX048 (PTX199, DTX425)

BEGBATES

ENDBATES

DESCRIPTION

DATE

DEPONENT

DEPOEXNO

KEU00103300

KEU00103362

8/17/2005

KEU00103363

KEU00103423

11/1/2005

KEU00103428

KEU00103474

7/24/2003

KEU00103475

KEU00103493

10/20/2000

KEU00103504

KEU00103530

12/4/1997

KEU00103809

KEU00103826

6/21/2002

KEU00104438

KEU00104467

6/28/2001

KEU00084340

KEU00084345

K0014549

K 0014565 Discovery Responses Interrogatories Discovery Responses Interrogatories Discovery Responses Interrogatories KFG's Responses to Keurig's First Set of

8/5/2001

7/16/2007 Halliday KFG's Responses to Keurig's Second Set of 2/25/2008 KFG's Responses to Keurig's Third Set of 4/8/2008

PX023

Patent

US 6,607,762

8/19/2003 Macmahon

PX073

Patent

U.S. Patent No. 7,328,651 B2

2/12/2008 Halliday

PX030

Physical Exhibit

Braun Tassimo Hot Beverage System TA1200

Physical Exhibit

Keurig Special Edition Model B60 Brewer

23

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 38 of 259

JOINT TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST -- 8/25/08

JTX JTX049 (PTX200, DTX036) JTX050 (PTX329, DTX055) JTX051 (PTX305, DTX096) JTX052 (PTX173, DTX103) JTX053 (PTX174, DTX106) JTX054 (PTX175, DTX105) JTX055 (PTX069, DTX118)

BEGBATES

ENDBATES

DESCRIPTION

DATE

DEPONENT

DEPOEXNO

Physical Exhibit

Keurig K cup

KEU00108681

KEU00108817

SEC

Kraft Foods, Inc. 10 K (annual period ending 12/31/05)

3/10/2006

K0017413

K0017462

Macmahon

PX074

Patent

European Patent Application Pub. No. 0 334 573 A1

3/20/1989 Bentley

PX089

Patent

European Patent Application Pub. No. 0 337 615 A1

3/20/1989 Bentley

PX093

Patent

European Patent Application Pub. No. 0 455 337 A1

3/22/1991 Bentley

PX092

K ED 0016047

K ED 0016049

9/27/2004 Rowan

PX008

24

CONFIDENTIAL

ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 39 of 259

EXHIBIT 5

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 40 of 259

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE KEURIG, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC., TASSIMO CORPORATION, and KRAFT FOODS INC., Defendants. EXHIBIT 5: KEURIG'S WITNESS LIST, KRAFT'S RESPONSE AND KEURIG'S REPLY WILL CALL LIST During its case in chief at trial, Keurig intends to call at least the following witnesses: Nicholas Lazaris Arthur Rock Center for Entrepreneurship Harvard Business School Boston, MA Professor Alexander Slocum (Keurig's Engineering Expert) Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room 3-445 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 A distinguished professor of mechanical engineering at MIT, Professor Slocum will testify to the subjects set forth in his expert reports and addressed at his deposition, including: (1) Kraft's infringement of the `762 patent; (2) Kraft's anticipation defense; (3) the technical benefits of same-side piercing; and (4) the direct and indirect costs that Kraft would have faced had it desired to create an acceptable design-around product at the time of the hypothetical negotiation with Keurig. Kraft's Response: Kraft objects to any testimony as to subjects on which Professor Slocum is unqualified to testify or opine as set forth in Kraft's motion in limine. Kraft also objects to any testimony beyond that contained in Professor Slocum's expert and rebuttal reports. Civil Action No. 07-017-GMS

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 41 of 259

Ted Lingle (Keurig's Coffee Brewing and Cupping Expert) Executive Director Coffee Quality Institute 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50 Long Beach, CA 90802 Drawing on his decades of experience in the coffee industry, including as a coffee cupper (taster) and a leading trainer of coffee cuppers, Mr. Lingle will testify to the subjects set forth in his expert reports and addressed at his deposition, including (1) the coffee brewing process; (2) the fact that ground coffee and tea are soluble beverage media as described in claim 1 of Keurig's `762 patent;1 (3) the benefits of same-side piercing from a customer and industry point of view; and (4) his expert evaluation of the liquid obtained from Mr. Lingle's experiments with Professor Slocum using the Kenco Singles cartridges in a same-side piercing configuration, as well as the nature of the liquid that would be obtained using the cartridges described in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,853,234 and 4,452,130 in a same-side piercing configuration. Kraft's Response: Kraft objects to Keurig calling more than one expert witness on each subject. Both Professor Slocum and Mr. Lingle will offer testimony as to Kraft's invalidity defense and their experiments using the Kenco Singles cartridges. Kraft further objects to any testimony as to subjects on which Mr. Lingle is unqualified to testify or opine. Mr. Lingle is not an expert in the single-serve beverage cartridge art, as discussed in detail in Kraft's Motion in Limine. Accordingly, Kraft objects to any testimony or opinion that will be provided by Mr. Lingle on the benefits of same-side piercing from a customer and industry point of view, or on other aspects of the single-serve beverage cartridge art. Kraft also objects to any testimony in which Mr. Lingle improperly provides constructions of claim terms not adopted by the Court, including the claim term "beverage." Accordingly, Kraft objects to any testimony that will be provided by Mr. Lingle in which he characterizes the liquid obtained from the Kenco Singles cartridges or the liquid that would be obtained using the cartridges described in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,853,234 and 4,452,130, as a "beverage" using his specialized construction of the claim term "beverage." Keurig's Reply: The testimony offered by Keurig's engineering expert, Professor Slocum, and its coffee expert Ted Lingle will not be duplicative. Mr. Lingle's expertise is in the coffee industry, while Professor Slocum's is in mechanical engineering. Professor Slocum developed and implemented an experimental setup to test the functionality of the Kenco Singles cartridge when used in the manner Kraft suggests. Mr. Lingle, an acknowledged coffee expert, directed his testimony to the issue of whether the resulting liquid constituted a coffee beverage ­ an issue squarely within his field of expertise. See also Keurig's opposition (D.I. 119) to Kraft's motion in limine.

Detailed testimony by Mr. Lingle on what constitutes a "soluble beverage medium" may be unnecessary if Kraft stipulates before trial that its accused T-Discs meet this claim limitation.

1

-2-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 42 of 259

Alan Ratliff (Keurig's Damages Expert) StoneTurn Group LLP One Shell Plaza 910 Louisiana Street, Suite 4905 Houston, TX 77002 Mr. Ratliff will testify to the subjects set forth in his expert reports and addressed at his deposition. His testimony will concern the quantum of damages owed by Kraft to Keurig for Kraft's infringement. Kraft's Response: Kraft objects to any testimony beyond that contained in Mr. Ratliff's expert and supplemental reports. Kraft also objects to any testimony that relies upon the inadmissible opinions of Mr. Ted Lingle regarding the benefits of same side piercing. Keurig's Reply: Keurig refers the Court to its opposition (D.I. 119) to Kraft's motion in limine. Notably, Kraft's motion does not even address Mr. Lingle's opinions regarding the benefits of same side piercing. MAY CALL LIST During its case in chief at trial, and/or in its rebuttal case,2 Keurig may call one or more of the following witnesses (whether live or by deposition): Kraft's response: Kraft objects to Keurig calling by deposition any witness within Kraft's control to the extent that the witness will be available to testify at trial. Janice Appleton IM&S Team Leader Kraft Foods UK Banbury, United Kingdom Roderick Beaulieu Ximedica LLC 55 Dupont Drive Providence, RI 02907 Kraft's response: Kraft objects to Keurig calling this witness by deposition because he is within Keurig's control.

Keurig does not concede that it would be appropriate for all of the Kraft fact and expert witnesses on this May Call List to testify at trial. The Court has not yet ruled on evidentiary issues raised in motions in limine or otherwise. However, Keurig does reserve its right to call any Kraft witness at least in its rebuttal case.

2

-3-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 43 of 259

Andrew Bentley Senior Program Leader, Machine Development, Technology Innovation Kraft Foods UK Banbury, United Kingdom Roger Deromedi 900 Illinois Rd. E Lake Forest, IL 60045 Maurice Gauthier Gauthier & Connors LLP 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Helen Glus Altria Group 120 Park Avenue New York, NY Anita Gogia Kraft Foods 555 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY Geraldine Greto Kraft Foods 555 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY 10591 Andrew Halliday Kraft Foods UK Banbury, England Lorraine Hansen Senior VP and General Manager-Coffee Kraft Foods North America 555 S. Broadway Tarrytown, New York, 10591 Adam Lloyd Kraft Foods UK Banbury, England

-4-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 44 of 259

Alistair (John) MacMahon Kraft Foods UK Banbury, England Arlene Powers Gauthier & Connors LLP 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Lee Rowan Senior Program Leader - IP and Competitive Surveillance Kraft Foods UK Banbury, United Kingdom Kevin Sullivan Keurig, Incorporated 55 Walkers Brook Drive Reading, MA 01867 Richard Sweeney Keurig, Incorporated 55 Walkers Brook Drive Reading, MA 01867 Michael Tamblin Plant Master Data Controller Coordinator Kraft Foods UK Banbury, United Kingdom Michael Waks Kraft Foods 3 Lakes Drive Northfield, IL Hubert Weber VP & Managing Director Iberia Kraft Foods Europe Madrid, Spain John Whoriskey Keurig, Incorporated 55 Walkers Brook Drive Reading, MA 01867 Dated: August 25, 2008

-5-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 45 of 259

EXHIBIT 6

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 46 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 47 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 48 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 49 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 50 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 51 of 259

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 52 of 259

EXHIBIT 7

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 53 of 259

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE KEURIG, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC., TASSIMO CORPORATION, and KRAFT FOODS INC., Defendants. EXHIBIT 7: STATEMENTS OF EXPERT WITNESSES' QUALIFICATIONS The parties agree that the following statements of expert witness qualifications are accurate and in such a form as may be read to the jury when the corresponding expert takes the stand. Civil Action No. 07-017-GMS

I.

KEURIG'S EXPERT WITNESSES

Professor Alexander Slocum, Ph.D. Dr. Alexander Slocum is a professor of mechanical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (known as MIT for short), where he received his Bachelor's, Master's and Ph.D. degrees. His principal fields of expertise are mechanical engineering, precision engineering, and machine design. Professor Slocum has written two books and has published more than 150 papers. He has received numerous awards and honors, including the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Leonardo da Vinci Award, and has been recognized at MIT for his dedication to teaching.

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 54 of 259

Professor Slocum regularly consults for companies on the development of new products. He is an inventor of more than 70 United States patents. A number of Professor Slocum's inventions have won awards for being among the 100 most significant new technical products of the year. Professor Slocum's current interests include the development of precision machines and instruments including medical devices and sustainable energy generation systems.

Ted Lingle1 Mr. Lingle has almost four decades of experience in the coffee industry and is currently the Executive Director of the Coffee Quality Institute, a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the quality of coffee and the lives of the people who produce it. Mr. Lingle previously served for 15 years as the Executive Director of the Specialty Coffee Association of America, a 2500-member trade association that sets quality standards and provides industry training in the areas of coffee processing, roasting, cupping (which means tasting) and brewing. For 20 years Mr. Lingle also served as vice president of marketing for a coffee roasting company and was responsible for establishing quality standards for the company's products as well as training customers and company employees.

Kraft objects to the reading of Mr. Lingle's "qualifications" and has filed a motion in limine as he is not an expert in the art consumer packaging and, thus, is not qualified to opine on issues related to the infringement or validity of the patent-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 6,607,762 ("`762 Patent"). Thus, Kraft requests an instruction from the Court that Mr. Lingle in not an expert in the relevant art of the `762 Patent if he is permitted to testify in any capacity. Keurig disagrees with Kraft for the reasons detailed in its opposition (D.I. 119) to Kraft's motion in limine. In particular, the '762 patent technology relates to several distinct arts and therefore must be assessed from the perspective of "the adepts of each." Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Calgene, Inc., 188 F.3d 1362, 1373 (Fed. Cir. 1999). -2-

1

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 55 of 259

Mr. Lingle developed the training material for the coffee industry's first certified professional designation for cupping and frequently trains and certifies new coffee cuppers and tasters around the world. Mr. Lingle has written a number of books that are widely known in the coffee industry, including The Coffee Cupper's Handbook (now in its third edition) and The Coffee Brewing Handbook: A Systematic Guide to Coffee Preparation. Mr. Lingle graduated from the United States Military Academy with a degree in civil engineering.

Alan Ratliff, CPA/MPA-JD Alan Ratliff is a Certified Public Accountant and a licensed attorney. He holds a bachelor's degree in accounting, a master's degree in accounting and tax, and a law degree, all received with high honors. He has over 120 University hours in accounting, economics and related commercial studies. Since completing his studies, Mr. Ratliff has 20 years of legal, accounting and economic consulting experience including working as a public accountant, a law clerk to a federal judge, an attorney, and the National Practice Leader for Ernst & Young's Intellectual Property Litigation Services. Mr. Ratliff has previously been qualified as an expert on patent infringement damages in a dozen federal courts across the United States including this Court, the District of Delaware. He has also been appointed by federal judges as an arbitrator in two intellectual property matters and as a Special Master in an international licensing dispute. Mr. Ratliff has served on the business school or law school faculty at three different universities, and delivers lectures and publishes articles several times annually on damages, valuation and expert witness topics including, for

-3-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 56 of 259

example, at conferences offered by Boston University, Virginia Tech, the American Bar Association, the New York City Bar, the American Intellectual Property Association and the Licensing Executives Society. Mr. Ratliff has worked on more than 100 patent infringement, patent valuation and license royalty audit projects, and has personally negotiated or directly supported the negotiation of more than three dozen licenses.

II.

KRAFT'S EXPERT WITNESSES

Malcolm E. Taylor Mr. Taylor has over 40 years of practical real-world experience as a design engineer who is recognized as an expert in the fields of product development, production design, and machine development. He currently consults with Foster-Miller, Inc. as a Senior Staff Engineer, but also has relationships with other technology and product development companies. Prior to his retirement from Foster-Miller, he served as a Division Manager, where he acted as a program manager, supervising projects and providing his extensive technical expertise. Mr. Taylor is listed as inventor or co-inventor on at least 20 U.S. patents Mr. Taylor's expertise lies in product development and production systems, and in particular, the packaging of products, design and construction of medical devices--both disposable and reusable, and the automatic assembly or processing of multiple parts. In particular, he has worked on projects related to: consumer packaging design; packaging of food products; troubleshooting problems with foil packaging; cold-formed foil packaging and lid stock with foil layers; injection molded, thermoformed, blow-molded plastics; and automatic assembly and packaging of consumer and medical products.

-4-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 57 of 259

Mr. Taylor graduated from Liverpool College of Technology in Liverpool, England, in 1957 with a degree in Mechanical Engineering. James Malackowski James E. Malackowski is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Ocean Tomo, LLC, an integrated Intellectual Capital Merchant Banc® firm providing financial products and services related to Intellectual Property expert testimony, valuation, investments, risk management and transactions. Ocean Tomo assists clients ­ corporations, law firms, governments and institutional investors ­ in realizing Intellectual Capital Equity® value broadly defined. Mr. Malackowski is a member of the IP Hall of Fame Academy and was recognized in 2007 by Managing Intellectual Property magazine as one of the fifty most influential people in intellectual property. In 2008, Mr. Malackowski was again named as one of the Top 50 IP professionals under the age of 45 in IP Law & Business. Prior to forming Ocean Tomo, he served as a finance and investment advisor working with one of the Nation's oldest investment banks as well as one of Chicago's largest private equity firms. Mr. Malackowski began his career spending fifteen years as a management consultant and forensic accountant focused on intangible assets. In this capacity Mr. Malackowski served numerous roles as a founding principal including President and Chief Executive Officer of his firm, growing the practice to the nation's largest before its sale. Mr. Malackowski has advised clients and counsel on business valuation issues as well as all phases of the technology transfer process. He has substantial experience as a Board Director for leading technology corporations as well as companies with critical brand management issues. His expertise extends to intangible asset portfolios as well as business segments and complete

-5-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 58 of 259

entities. Apart from his own firm, Mr. Malackowski has served in a leadership role with numerous corporate entities, both public and private. He is a member of the President's Council for the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry and a current Director of Invent Now, Inc., a subsidiary of the National Inventors Hall of Fame where Mr. Malackowski previously served as Trustee. Mr. Malackowski is Secretary for The Licensing Executives Society International, Inc. He is a Past President of The Licensing Executives Society USA and Canada, Inc. and a former Director of the International Intellectual Property Institute as well as a prior Resident Advisor for the U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Information Agency on matters relating to intellectual capital. On more than thirty occasions, Mr. Malackowski has served as an expert in Federal Court on questions relating to intellectual property economics, including the subject of business valuation and the impact of advertising programs. As an inventor, Mr. Malackowski has ten issued U.S. patents and an even larger number of pending applications. He is an Adjunct Instructor at the University of Notre Dame Mendoza College of Business where he was a Summa Cum Laude graduate majoring in accountancy and philosophy. Mr. Malackowski is a Certified Licensing Professional and a Registered Certified Public Accountant in the State of Illinois.

Dated: August 25, 2008

-6-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 59 of 259

EXHIBIT 8

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 60 of 259

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE KEURIG, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC., TASSIMO CORPORATION, and KRAFT FOODS INC., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-017-GMS

EXHIBIT 8: KEURIG'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS, KRAFT'S OBJECTIONS AND COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS, AND KEURIG'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO THE COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS

Plaintiff Keurig, Inc. ("Keurig") makes the deposition designations listed in the tables below. Certain segments of designated testimony may be used in Keurig's case-in-chief, whereas others are included only because they may be necessary for Keurig's rebuttal case. Therefore, Keurig does not concede that a particular excerpt of testimony listed below can or should be read or played into evidence. In response to Keurig's deposition designations, Defendants Kraft Foods Global, Inc., Tassimo Corporation, and Kraft Foods Inc. (collectively "Kraft") make objections and counterdesignations, also listed in the tables below. In response to Kraft's counter-designations, Keurig makes objections and replydesignations, further listed in the tables below.

Dated: August 25, 2008

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 61 of 259

TABLE OF CONTENTS ANDREW BENTLEY (2/27/08).................................................................................................... 1 ANDREW BENTLEY (4/2/08)...................................................................................................... 1 ROGER DEROMEDI (3/31/08)..................................................................................................... 1 ANITA GOGIA (3/27/08) .............................................................................................................. 3 ANDREW HALLIDAY (2/22/08) ................................................................................................. 4 LORRAINE HANSEN (3/26/08) ................................................................................................... 8 ADAM LLOYD (2/25/08)............................................................................................................ 11 ALISTAIR JOHN MACMAHON (2/26/08)................................................................................ 13 ALISTAIR JOHN MACMAHON (2/27/08)................................................................................ 16 LEE ROWAN (2/21/08) ............................................................................................................... 16 MICHAEL WAKS (3/20/08)........................................................................................................ 16 HUBERT WEBER (4/1/08).......................................................................................................... 18

i

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 62 of 259

ANDREW BENTLEY (2/27/08)
PL.'S DESIGNATIONS [4:19] - [5:9] [5:25] - [6:3] [7:25] - [8:14] [9:22] - [11:13] [11:14] - [13:16] [13:17] - [13:19] [14:9] - [14:23] [15:19] - [16:6] [17:14] - [17:21] [18:22] - [22:25] [23:2] - [23:18] [25:8] - [25:19] [50:23] - [51:5] [53:23] - [54:11] [55:18] - [56:19] [56:24] - [58:23] [59:11] - [63:15] [78:20] - [79:10] DEF.'S COUNTERDESIGNATIONS DEF.'S OBJECTIONS PL.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEF.'S COUNTERS PL.'S REPLY DESIGNATIONS

8:15-23 Relevance

16:7-9

23:19-25:7

56:20-23 58:24-59:7 63:16-19 Motion in Limine No. 1 (D.I. 108)

ANDREW BENTLEY (4/2/08)
PL.'S DESIGNATIONS [21:18] - [22:7] DEF.'S COUNTERDESIGNATIONS 20:16-21:18; 22:13-20 DEF.'S OBJECTIONS PL.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEF.'S COUNTERS Motion in Limine No. 1 (D.I. 108) PL.'S REPLY DESIGNATIONS

ROGER DEROMEDI (3/31/08)
DEF.'S OBJECTIONS PL.'S DESIGNATIONS [15:20] - [16:1] [18:6] - [18:14] [20:11] - [21:1] [24:6] - [25:11] [25:15] - [25:22] [27:5] - [28:6] [28:7] - [28:13] [28:19] - [29:4] DEF.'S COUNTERDESIGNATIONS PL.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEF.'S COUNTERS PL.'S REPLY DESIGNATIONS

21:2-14 25:12-14 25:23-26:2 28:7-8 28:14-18

1

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 63 of 259

DEF.'S OBJECTIONS PL.'S DESIGNATIONS [29:18] - [29:21] [30:6] - [30:23] [32:22] - [34:1] [34:13] - [34:18] [35:10] - [36:1] [38:19] - [39:2] [40:2] - [40:7] [40:9] - [40:24] [41:11] - [41:19] [42:14] - [43:14] [44:13] - [45:7] [45:9] - [45:14] [46:4] - [46:17] [47:22] - [48:12] [48:19] - [49:3] [49:11] - [49:17] [52:14] - [52:17] [52:22] - [53:24] [60:8] - [60:11] DEF.'S COUNTERDESIGNATIONS

PL.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEF.'S COUNTERS

PL.'S REPLY DESIGNATIONS

31:16-32:21

36:23-38:18 41:1-5 41:6-10 43:15-44:12 45:15-22 46:18-47:21 48:13-18

[61:8] - [62:6]

[62:11] - [63:6] [63:15] - [63:21] [65:4] - [65:12] [65:22] - [66:4] [66:14] - [66:19] [67:3] - [67:20] [69:2] - [69:5] [69:11] - [69:18] [70:3] - [70:11] [73:11] - [73:18] [74:4] - [75:2] [76:11] - [77:1] [77:3] - [77:14] [79:4] - [79:23] [83:5] - [84:1] [87:12] - [87:17] [91:16] - [92:21] [92:24] - [93:6] [93:12] - [93:18]

64:20-65:3 65:17-21

60:8-11 (relevance) 61:8-11; 61:13; 61:21; 62:4-5 (relevance) 62:11-14; 62:2022;62:24-63:2 (relevance) 63:15-17; 63:1920 (hearsay) 65:4-9 (hearsay)

67:3-5; 67:7-10 (relevance)

70:12-71:5

93:12-14; 93:16-

2

Case 1:07-cv-00017-GMS

Document 148-2

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 64 of 259

DEF.'S OBJECTIONS PL.'S DESIGNATIONS DEF.'S COUNTERDESIGNATIONS 17 (relevance) 94:5-6; 94:8; 94:10 (relevance)

PL.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEF.'S COUNTERS

PL.'S REPLY DESIGNATIONS

[94:5] - [94:12] [96:10] - [97:4] [99:9] - [100:6] [101:6] - [102:19] [104:14] - [104:18] [105:3] - [105:12] [105:23] - [106:2] [120:13] - [120:16]

104:19-105:2 106:3-10

ANITA GOGIA (3/27/08)
PL.'S DESIGNATIONS [4:13] - [4:19] [5:18] - [6:17] [6:20] - [7:14] [10:13] - [12:3] [12:9] - [13:3] [13:4] - [13:17] [14:4] - [16:24] [17:4] - [18:4] [18:8] - [18:12] [18:16] - [19:10] DEF.'S COUNTERDESIGNATIONS DEF.'S OBJECTIONS 6:18-19 (form, ambiguous) PL.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEF.'S COUNTERS PL.'S REPLY DESIGNATIONS

17:1-3 (outside 30(b)(6)) 18:5-7 (outside 30(b)(6)) 18:13-15 (outside 30(b)(6)) 33:23-24 (assumes facts not in evidence) 65:11 (outside 30(b)(6)) 75:13-14 (lack of foundation) 79:4-6 (outside 30(b)(6))

[19:21] - [33:22] [34:1] - [54:3] [54:11] - [65:11] [65:14] - [75:12] [75:15] - [76:2] [76:10] - [79:3] [7