Free Notice of Appeal - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv—00036-JJF Document 46 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF .·\PPE.·\I,
TO
I U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD CIRCUIT
U.S. District Court for the District of Dclriwzire
CIIQCUIT CO CRT
DOCKET NUMBER;
Ile;i·.‘i: hlxiiilw
FULL CAPTION IN DISTRICT COURT AS FOLLOWS:
"f`· ~—· <§_ ic! NOK \\E% 53;; @3*, sx Qgxqx c_(,-gy DISTRICT C0 IJRT
`3'N \\\ \ Q \ DOCKET NUNIBER: Gqr $§,··.3,)\;
=
v. D IST RICJLCO L' RT N
` _ JUDGE; Bebreg X; gy; B gt;
osu ‘\s\¤ . ow ~
Notice is hereby given that — V <’ ` \>' Bs
tN.irned Prnt;)
appeals to the United States Court ot` Appetit; t`or the Third Circuit t`roni[ l iudgment$N] Order,
[ ] Other (specitfv)
entered in this action on §*>§ S3 ‘)_¤¤§ F { I _ _ L
(date) H
Dated; Efstxg le; - . I . [_
; MAY 4 3 2008
To \ .` 0 V ,' is "'”`· ·¤K;.»I.¤_» M_ _ V
i U·S· Uiiidhitf I ~ ’ ‘
(Counsel for Appellant-Signature) " ``‘‘ D'S "’° @ V AR
`y:§;&~sJ~‘\ §`·\¤)gg NT. Q Q—¤—- \—,t_ cwwt, ; I-·§JC\\L,g qgc. by
(Name ofCounseI_—T_ d L_ _ (C · r It` A _ llee] . V _
Sb t,\¤~=»~»·>~¤¢ c.¤2\ ·.¤·\~•‘~¤~\ Ei:,·ix·..< (STX °" `~'“*`—*·i—;L&c§ wh ¤ ¤.\ ‘>\‘·-Ss *‘·u'* "’\i’ `-.
l {BC`, Q g *5 x \ lu `$`~.gF.(°*·\\.·...‘4’\ ~·
(Address) (Address)
5 '¢·~;\m~x ¤~n.\, i\°\\`”\°°\ `xxgl; ~~:1§,=»`<=» ,»: Gris; i§;°·g,•t{;
(City, State Zip) Icity, State Zip)
(Telephone Number) (Telephone Number)
NOTE: USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS if all appellants and/or ull counsel for appeUecs cunuot be listed on the
Notice of Appeal sheet.

Case 1:07-cv—00036-JJF Document 46 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 2 of 2
Cass‘k®?~cv# Q03§~J$? Qtxiunenisé ?§sd U5£XN2GG8 Esge‘§ofi
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
EDWARD GIBBS, :
Petitioner, ;
v. Z Civ. Act. No. O7-36-JJF
PERRY PHELPS, Warden, and E
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE :
OF DELAWARE, :
Respondents. E
O R D E R
At Wilmington, this __2L day of May, 2008, for the reasons
set forth in the Memorandum Opinion issued this date;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
I. Petitioner Edward Gibbs’ Application For A Writ Of
Habeas Corpus Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (D.I. 1.) is
DISMISSED, and the relief requested therein is DENIED.
2. Petitioner’s Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (D.I. 43.)
is DENIED.
3. The Court declines to issue a certificate of
appealability because Petitioner has failed to satisfy the
standards set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
I ED TA S DISTRI GE