Free Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :07-cv-00057-I\/I PT Document 60 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
VENETEC NTERNATIONAL, INC. 3
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
) C.A. No.: 07-CV-0057 ***
NEXU S MEDICAL, LLC )
)
Defendant. )
)
NEXUS MEDICAL LLC’S MOTION TO CLARIFY OR AMEND
THE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Defendant Nexus Medical LLC hereby requests the Court to clarify, or if
necessary amend, Paragraph 5(b) of the Stipulated Protective Order entered by this Court
on May 21, 2007 (D.I. 32). Nexus seeks an order that the prosecution bar set forth in
Paragraph 5(b) does not prohibit a party’s litigation counsel from participating in the
reexamination of its opponent’s patents.
A memorandum in support of this motion is being filed concurrently herewith.

Case 1 :07-cv-00057-IVIPT Document 60 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 4
/
[/
I
Date: July 13, 2007 ,
Richard K. Hernn #405
Maiy B. Matterer 2696
MORRIS JAME LLP
500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500
Wilmington, Delaware 19801-1494
Telephone: 302-888-6800
Facsimile: 302-571-1750
[email protected]
Of Counsel:
Scott R. Brown (Admitted Pro Hoc Vice)
Jennifer C. Bailey (Admitted Pro Hoc Vice)
HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP
2405 Grand Boulevard, Suite 400
Kansas City, Missouri 64108
T: 816-474-9050
F: 816-474-9057
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDAN T AND
C O UN T ER CLAIM-PLAIN T IF F
NEXUS MEDICAL, LLC
2

Case 1 :07-cv-00057-IVIPT Document 60 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 3 of 4
RULE 7.1.1 CERTIFICATE
The undersigned certifies that movant has made reasonable efforts to reach an agreement
with opposing counsel on the matters set forth in this Motion but to no avail.
M . Matt er (#2696)

Case 1:07-cv-00057-IVIPT Document 60 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
VENETEC NTERNATIONAL, INC. )
)
Plaintiff; )
)
v. )
) C.A. No.: 07-CV-0057
NEXU S MEDICAL, LLC )
)
Defendant. )
)

|PROPOSED| ORDER
Now pending before the Cou1t is Nexus Medical LLC’s MOTION TO CLARH-TY OR
AMEND THE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARJN G THEREFOR, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant’s
motion is GRANTED. Paragraph 5(b) does not prohibit a party’s litigation counsel Hom
participating in the reexamination of its opponent’s patents.
Dated:
United States District Court Judge