Free Designated Record on Appeal - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 258.3 kB
Pages: 4
Date: February 9, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 745 Words, 5,107 Characters
Page Size: 614.4 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37762/2.pdf

Download Designated Record on Appeal - District Court of Delaware ( 258.3 kB)


Preview Designated Record on Appeal - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv—OO075-G|\/IS Document2 Filed 02/09/2007 Page1 0f4
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
——————————-—-——————--———~---—— x 2
In re: : Chapter 11 E
AMTROL HOLDINGS, INC., et a1.,: Case No. 06-11446 (KG)
: (Jointly Administered)
Debtors. :
Z Re: Docket No. 131
——··——-.——··-e· ——~— -·····-················ ·***·· ·····•···-··}{, _ A
DESIGNATION OF ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE
RECORD AND STATEMENT OF ISSUES ON APPEAL
T
Pursuant to Federal Bankruptcy Rule 8006, New England
Gas Company and Narragansett Electric Company, both d/b/a i
National Grid (collectively, the “Appellants”), by counsel, l
hereby (i) designate the items for inclusion in the record p
and (ii) state the issues, in connection with this appeal, as i
follows:
DESIGNATION OF RECORD
l. Transcript of the January ll, 2007, hearing.
2. The Debtors’ Motion Fbr a Bridge Order and a Final
Order (I) Prohibiting Utility Companies From Discontinuing,
l
Altering or Refusing Service, (II) Establishing Procedures l
For Providing Deposits To Requesting Utilities, (III) Deeming i
1
sm 697207v1/000000.00000

Case 1:07-cv—0O075-G|\/IS Document 2 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 2 of 4
_ Utility Companies To Have Adequate Assurance of Payment, and
(IV) Establishing Procedures For Resolving Requests Fbr
·»-»»w~s‘= eAdditional Assurance Pursuant To ll U.S.C. §§ lO5(a)·&. ·. _‘·- s -¤ · (
366(Docket No. 23)(the “Uti1ity Motion").
3. Exhibit C to the Utility Motion (Docket No. 29).
4.. Affidavit of Service dated December 19, 2006 (
(Docket No. 31).
A 5. Bridge Order (I) Prohibiting Utility Companies Prom l 1 hiwwy
1
Discontinuing, Altering or Refusing Service, (II) (
Establishing Procedures For Providing Deposits To Requesting g
1
Utilities, (III) Deeming Utility Companies To Have Adequate 1
Assurance of Payment, and (IV) Establishing Procedures Fbr (
Resolving Requests For Additional Assurance Pursuant To ll I
U.S.C. §§ l05(a) & 366 (Docket No. 51) (the “Bridge Order"). 1
6. Objection of New England Gas Company And I
Narragansett Electric Company, Both d/b/a National Grid To ` y
the Utiiity Motion (Docket No. 94) (the “Objection”). 1
U 7. Final Order (I) Prohibiting Utility Companies From Q
Discontinuing, Altering or Refusing Service, (II) y
Establishing Procedures For Providing Deposits To Requesting 1
Utilities, (III) Deeming Utility Companies To Have Adequate 1
Assurance of Payment, and (IV) Establishing Procedures Fbr 1 (
2
sm 697207111/0o0000.00000
1
1
1
1
1
1

Case 1:07-cv—OOO75-G|\/IS Document 2 Filed O2/O9/2007 Page 3 of 4 p
Resolving Requests For Additional Assurance Pursuant To ll
U.S.C. §§ lO5(a) & 366 that was entered on January ll, 2007
*‘* l‘=‘ v--·‘ f ** ~`(Docket No; 120) (the~“Final Order"); » 1 ~» ·‘Vl » ·1»ag;u i
8. Notice of Appeal dated January l9, 2007 (Docket No. j
131) .
STATEMENT OF ISSUES §
>%%nQ@R£&jE@Q#f#U$@L@Did§thezB6¤k£QP£€Ya§¤¤§£#GQ? 1`7 11‘‘ in enterinqurne;Bss¤9s~*** ‘—*·. Vvli !;?7j A'7
Order on an ex parte basis, which required the Appellants to 5
{
E
retain counsel and file an objection to retain its rights
under ll U.S.C. §366?
2. Did the adequate assurance of payment procedures W
approved by the Bankruptcy Court in the third Ordered
paragraph of the Final Order violate the provisions of ll ip
u.s.c. §366? i
3. Did the Bankruptcy Court err in holding that the E
Debtors’ Utility Motion was a pleading filed pursuant to ll i
U.S.C. §366(c)(3)(A) that was ripe for an evidentiary hearing j
and adjudication at the January ll, 2007 hearing?
2 4. Did the Bankruptcy Court err in holding an i
evidentiary hearing at the January ll, 2007 hearing on the \
Utility Motion and the Objection to the Utility Motion filed }
by Appellants? i
_ sm 697207vl/O00000.00000
3 i

Case 1:07-cv—OO075-G|\/IS Document 2 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 4 of 4
5. Did the Bankruptcy Court err in holding that 4
Appellant’s adequate assurance of payment request of a two-
month deposit should be modified to the payment of a two-week_ · . .
deposit pursuant to the Final Order? l
Dated: January 26, 2007 STEVENS &}f E, P.C.
q 4 p y _ /s/.~ i l D,. Demmyt, i 4 -_ _, _j, v_
John D. Demmy (I.D. No. 2802)
. 1105 North Market Street 9
7th Floor L
Wilmington, Delaware 19801 {
Phone: (302) 425-3308 l
Fax: (610) 371-8515
E-mail: [email protected]

-and-
Russell R. Johnson III i
2258 Wheatlands Drive
Manakin-Sabot, Virginia 23103 l
Phone: (804) 749-8861 l
l Counsel for Appellants i
l
l
4 I
su 697207vl/000000.00000
l
§
2