Free Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cr-00022-JJF Document 32 Filed 01/18/2008 Page1 0f2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :
Plaintiff, i SEAXEDUMUEQLGD Ihfbfaj
v. i Criminal Action No. 07—022—JJF
STEVEN KELLAM, Z
Defendant. 2
O R D E F.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has filed a Motion For Exclusion Of
Time Pursuant To The Speedy Trial Act;
WHEREAS, the Defendant was ordered to respond to the
motion by November 9, 2007 (D.I. 28);
WHEREAS, to date, a response has not been filed;
WHEREAS, the Court finds that an exclusion of time under
the Speedy Trial Act is necessary because the arguments raised by
the parties regarding the Motion to Suppress are sufficiently
detailed, numerous and complex such that they require additional
time beyond the 30—day window provided by Section 3i6l(h)(1)(J) of
the Act, for their considered resolution by the Court. The Court
further finds that the failure to grant Plaintiff’s Motion for
Exclusion Of Time would result in a miscarriage of justice, in
that is would deprive the Court of the time it needs to properly
consider and resolve the suppression issues, which are significant
to the overall outcome of this matter. As a result, the Court
further finds that the ends of justice served by gJantin§?éh§s gf D iq
? /‘ a ttrrtr 1
JAM 18 20ua } j
1 "T%T§:?{·EE€HT"
]__n_ M Dr$TR%£i0FOF1_.¤.wARE _______

Case 1:07-cr-00022-JJF Document 32 Filed 01/18/2008 Page 2 of 2
exclusion outweigh the best interests of the public and the
defendant in a speedy trial.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Plaintiff’s
Motion For Exclusion Of Time Pursuant To The Speedy Trial Act is
GRANTED. The period of time from the August ll, 2007 until the
date a decision on the Motion to Suppress is rendered is excluded
under the Speedy Trial Act.
F a !". fl! . _| if-"`¤
January .dl. 2008 __ &:Qj£% }d¥H}U¤¢~¢x.j;&
DATE UNITED»STATES DISTRTQT UDGE