Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv-00091-G|\/IS Document 5 Filed O3/13/2007 Page 1 of 1
ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT @3 GODDESS, P. A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SUITE 1401, 919 MARKET STREET
P. O. BOX 1070
JO$EPH A- ROSENTHAI- Wrrmmcrow, DELAWARE tosoo-1070 TELEPHONE (302) 655"*"33
NQRMAN M_ MQNHAIT FACSIMILE (302) 658-7567
JEFFREY s. coDDEss
cA1zME1.1.A P. KEENER March 13, 2007
EDWARD E. ROSENTI-IAL
JESSICA ZELDIN
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING/HAND DELIVERY
The Hon. Gregory M. Sleet
United States District Judge
U.S. District Court
844 North King Street, Room 4234
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
RE: Levy v. Brooks Automation, Inc., et al.;
D.Del., C.A. N0. 06-517 GMS
Rosenberg v. Brooks Automation, Inc., et al.;
D.Del. C.A. No. 06-091 GMS
Dear Judge Sleet:
Enclosed is a stipulation which, if approved and ordered by Your Honor, would
consolidate two near-identical cases.
Also, as set forth in the body of the stipulation (at paras. 3 and 4), in order to out down
on duplication, it provides that the current Rule 12 briefing (in the earlier tiled case) would not
have to be repeated and re-tiled, while, at the same time, recognizing that one defense in the
earlier case (a demand defense) is not being asserted in the second case.
Of course if Your Honor wishes to hear more from counsel about this or any other aspect
of the case, we will promptly comply.
Respectmyirs,
Jeffre e s (Del. Bar No. 630)
J SG/emw
Enclosure
cc: Matthew F. Davis, Esquire (via electronic filing)
Brian C. Ralston, Esquire (via electronic filing)