‘â€=’M‘\O 440 [Rev. SIOIJ Sunimuns in a Civil Actirltt
UNITED STATES DISTRICT Co · T
District of . Delaware
Ph? vera, rw;. , ill%t€rI3 ?En2¤tav-~ ,
LEQDQE as Siliitt, Hit I lvvbivtthw/‘.LL`r’
{rtg ati Qeittttif ui WA`; Siieiiroivi-rf f>!F1’~»~·’*.1€® suwnvro ... IN A CIVIL CASE
v.
l°l’1UT;t‘vll El~.1`TiEE PMB ES J L. L ( rt»~t> _ _ C H
. - - . CASE N rt; .2.
grip; L ori, tt1tv~D}l»iU —{ UMBE ‘· I
TO} {Naaneand address Oi-DCfCl1Ll1`t11[_] M.___f»
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve on PLAINTIFFS * TTORNEY mama and a¤1¤Imss)
{mera is- iam! Ant) ld Ta AE t yp /1
· . __ ,. _ ` _ __ "7 I PF.
IEZMMEL, ctititiie TF, Dv ev°r·“—J ’ l - I`] .
Do .t$¤,=t imo
`seaitt De l‘170'l
an answer to the complaint which is served on you with this summons, within A O days after service
ofthis summons on you, exclusive ofthe day of service. If you fail to do so,judgmen by default will be taken against you
for the relief demanded in the complaint. Any answer that you serve on the parts o this action must be filed with the
Clerk ot` this Court within a reasonable period of time after service.
PETER T. D/3t`Ll.EG
Q, /2. O 7
CLERK DATE
Lo CQ
[By) DEPUTY CLERK
· .» Pa o 2 of 4
Case 1 :07-cv—00099-GIVIS Document 4 Filed 03/22/ 007 Q
QLAIZ} 4410 (Rev. S/U1] Summoma in ti Civil Actioit I
S ' I I S tl 1 ` it t "’ DATE ` ‘
' ‘ I . · { 1. E ` "· t" ‘--
zmvicco ic umtrtons an comp imtwiq mi c ay mc Ir,]. ]f__L-ll` I 5 L__._}O f
N1‘\I\-1E OF s5RvEtz {PRh'v}7`) J I
IIC:.n L- IZ.) Vi it I LI
C/rmi- wie box be/ow ro indfmre tr:. nm more mc:/md o `.·.·ci·vice
CI Scrvod pcrsontally upon thc dcfcntiamt, Piacc whcrc scrvcti: I
Ci Lcft copics tltcrcof ut thc dcl`cnd:mt’s dwclliug house: or usual plucc of zibodc with at pcr on of suitatblc ztgc amd
discictioti tht:11 rcsiding lhcrciu. I
Nami: of pcrsou with whom thc summons and complaint wcrc |t:|`l:
Ci Rctumcd uncxcctttcd: I
[if _Othcr (sinccify): v~Lg.I [uber ;` `¤;~.;.-I c. L-. _ mit I"-. TL LU-c·».fLu~\ ( *‘ ·t,-vs QI- 7 I I C.: ·r in
IK,-Z!-’..»~ t [I Ji E ‘ "· -..; `I ri"-‘;( I ' 1 7-; I. I ln I ."; I I rn \I " \, A-I ¤ I" I.J¤"\ ; ·\.'-"!\
not .4* -..-.- .. I it
Sm-EMENT OFSERWCEFEES ¤
DECLARATION OFSERVER ¤
ltlcclttrc tmdcr penalty ofpcrjury uhclcr thc laws of thc Unitcd Stzttcs of Amcricn att tho iorcgoing information
comatincd in thc Rctttm uf`Sc1·vicc and Stattcmcnt of Scrvicc Fccs is truc amd corrcct.
‘.· '_‘ ' r' - .4 .—· ir. {I - - .-·
Exccutcdon Iii Iâ€L_E}_,< yi I 2 , lt Lgi X
Dttlc .$`z`gm:tr.·re :1fSc.r1*cr I
·v . 'T"‘-I` ‘ " ,I __ I "··—-
—*--Io? -5 --5 HI Hit-? it I I
(I] Ae; tu who I'I'lCI}’ scrvc an summons scc Rulc 4 of thc Fctlcmi Rulcs of Civil Pmcctlurc, I
Case 1:07-cv—00099-Gl\/IS Document 4 Filed 03/22/ 007 Page 3 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR
FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE 1
MP vtsra, mc., Harare Psraotsurvr ; fl I ` 9 9 ·—
WARREN’S SHELL, INC., INDIVIDUALLY : No.
AND ON BEHALF OF THOSE : ?.$}n
SLMILARLY SITUATED ; iq. .
vartsus Q H
MOTNA ENTERPRISES, LLC AND SHELL : ll-.
OIL COMPANY : `°’
COMPLAINT- CLASS ACTION
NOW INTO COURT, throught undersigned counsel and purs ant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 23 come MP Vista, Inc., Habib Petroleum, Warren’s hell, Inc., Individually
And On Behalf Of` Those Similarly Situated, all of which ARE Flori corporations who
individually and on behalf of those similarly situated represent as fol ws;
I.--INTRODUCTION I
THE plaintiffs are retail channel partners of the defendants ri o were directed to close
their fuel pumps on May 26, 2004 after Motiva discovered the gasoli 1 e it refined at its Norco
Refinery in Louisiana and distributed in Florida, Mississippi, and Lo isiana was contaminated
with trace amounts of elemental sulfar.
Il.--DEFENDANTS
Defendants here, Motiva Enterprises, LLC and Shell Oil Com any, are a limited liability
company and a business corporation, respectively, both of which are omiciled at 1209 Orange
Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.
IH.-—JURlSDICTION
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Action Fairness Act
(CAFA) 28 USC 1332(d)(2) because this is a class action in which th re is at least minimal
diversity and the matter in controversy exceeds the sum of Five Milli rr Dollars(S5,000,000.00)
exclusive of interest and costs. I
Case 1:07-cv—00099-Gl\/IS Document 4 Filed 03/22/ 007 Page 4 of 4
unduly burdensome on individual class members, defendants, and the •|•urt system. Additionally,
because of the disparity of resources available to individual class mem ti ers, prosecution of
separate actions would work a financial hardship on many class mcmb rs. Finally, a class
certification is appropriate because the prosecution of separate actions it individual members of
the class would create a risk of adjudications with respect to individual members ofthe class that
would be as practical matter be dispositive of the interests of thc other ` iembers not parties to the
adjudications, and would substantially impair their ability to protect th ir interests.
XVII.
The plaintiffs pray for a trial by jury.
WHEREFORE, the plaintiffs, MP Vista, lnc., Habib Petroleui Warren’s Shell, inc.
Individually And On Behalf Of Those Similarly Situated, pray for Jud g, nent against the
defendaitts, Motiva Enterprises, LLC and Shell Oil Company, togethei with costs and attorney
fees.
Respectfully submitted,
JO ATHAN B. O’NEI l L, ESQ. Bar I.D. 4442
MORTON R. KIMME Il , ESQ. Bar LD. 132
MICHAEL D. BEDNA H, ESQ. Bar LD.2948
Kimmel, Carter, Roman J Peltz., PA.
200 Biddle Avenue, Suit 101
Spingside Plaza
Newark, Delawarcl 9702
(302) 392—527?
Attorneys for Plaintiffs