Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 37.0 kB
Pages: 5
Date: August 21, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,052 Words, 6,316 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37816/57.pdf

Download Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware ( 37.0 kB)


Preview Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00104-MPT

Document 57

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION and ) PARKER INTANGIBLES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) SEIREN CO., LTD., ) ) Defendant.

C.A. No. 07-104 (MPT)

ANSWER OF DEFENDANT SEIREN CO., LTD TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant Seiren Co., Ltd. ("Seiren") hereby answers the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiffs Parker Hannifin Corporation and Parker Intangibles, LLC ("Parker"), as follows: 1. Seiren lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the

truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the Complaint, and therefore denies the same. 2. Seiren lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the

truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of the Complaint, and therefore denies the same. 3. Seiren admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 of the Complaint. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. 5. Seiren admits the allegations of Paragraph 4 of the Complaint. Seiren admits the allegations of Paragraph 5 of the Complaint. THE PATENTS 6. Seiren admits that U.S. Patent No. 6,387,523 ("the '523 patent") issued on

May 14, 2002, but denies that the '523 patent issued duly or legally. With respect to the

Case 1:07-cv-00104-MPT

Document 57

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 2 of 5

remaining allegations of this Paragraph, Seiren is without sufficient information to admit or deny and therefore denies the same. 7. Seiren admits that U.S. Patent No. 6,521,348 ("the '348 patent") issued on

February 18, 2003, but denies that the '348 patent issued duly or legally. With respect to the remaining allegations of this Paragraph, Seiren is without sufficient information to admit or deny and therefore denies the same. 8. Seiren admits that U.S. Patent No. 6,716,536 ("the '536 patent") issued on

April 6, 2004, but denies that the '536 patent issued duly or legally. With respect to the remaining allegations of this Paragraph, Seiren is without sufficient information to admit or deny and therefore denies the same. 9. Seiren admits that U.S. Patent No. 6,777,095 ("the '095 patent") issued on

August 17, 2004, but denies that the '095 patent issued duly or legally. With respect to the remaining allegations of this Paragraph, Seiren is without sufficient information to admit or deny and therefore denies the same. 10. Seiren admits that U.S. Patent No. 6,248,393 ("the '393 patent") issued on

June 19, 2001, but denies that the '393 patent issued duly or legally. With respect to the remaining allegations of this Paragraph, Seiren is without sufficient information to admit or deny and therefore denies the same. PATENT INFRINGEMENT 11. 12. Seiren denies each and every allegation of Paragraph 11 of the Complaint. Seiren denies each and every allegation of Paragraph 12 of the Complaint.

-2-

Case 1:07-cv-00104-MPT

Document 57

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 3 of 5

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES First Affirmative Defense 13. Seiren has not infringed any of the claims of the '523 patent, the '348

patent, the '536 patent, the '095 patent, or the '393 patent, either directly or by inducing or contributing to their infringement by others. Second Affirmative Defense 14. The '523 patent, the '348 patent, the '536 patent, the '095 patent and the '393

patent are each invalid because they fail to satisfy one or more of the conditions for patentability set forth in 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 102, 103, and 112. Third Affirmative Defense 15. The '523 patent, the '348 patent, the '536 patent, the '095 patent and the '393

patent are invalid as a result of obviousness-type double patenting. Fourth Affirmative Defense 16. Parker is estopped by virtue of amendments and statements made during

the course of prosecution of the '523 patent, the '348 patent, the '536 patent, the '095 patent, and the '393 patent from obtaining any construction of the claims of the patents that could cover any of Seiren's products and the methods by which those products are made. Fifth Affirmative Defense 17. of 35 U.S.C. § 287. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS 18. Seiren is still investigating this matter and has not yet had an opportunity to On information and belief, Parker has failed to comply with the provisions

conduct any discovery, and therefore reserves the right to raise such additional defenses as may be appropriate upon further investigation and discovery. -3-

Case 1:07-cv-00104-MPT

Document 57

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 4 of 5

WHEREFORE, Seiren prays as follows: A. entered for Seiren; B. That the '523 patent, the '348 patent, the '536 patent, the '095 patent and the That Parker take nothing by reason of its Complaint, and that judgment be

'393 patent and each and every claim thereof be adjudged to be invalid and the Seiren be adjudged not to infringe such patent; C. That the Court declare this an exceptional case and award Seiren its

attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285; and D. proper. DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38, Seiren hereby demands a trial by jury. MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP That the Court grant such other and further relief as it deems just and

/s/ Paul Saindon
OF COUNSEL: Scott M. Daniels Ken-Ichi Hattori Michael J. Caridi WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN, LLP 1250 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 822-1100 August 21, 2008
2456746

Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) Julia Heaney (#3052) Paul Saindon (#5110) 1201 North Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 (302) 658-9200 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Seiren Co., Ltd.

-4-

Case 1:07-cv-00104-MPT

Document 57

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 5 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on August 21, 2008 I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of such filing to: Rudolf E. Hutz, Esquire Francis DiGiovanni, Esquire CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP I further certify that I caused to be served copies of the foregoing document on August 21, 2008 upon the following in the manner indicated: BY E-MAIL Rudolf E. Hutz, Esquire Francis DiGiovanni, Esquire Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP The Nemours Building 1007 N. Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19801

/s/ Paul Saindon
Paul Saindon (#5110)