Free Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 16.8 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 29, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 523 Words, 3,256 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37861/20.pdf

Download Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware ( 16.8 kB)


Preview Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00127-JJF

Document 20

Filed 03/29/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SAFETY BRAKING CORPORATION, MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP. and G&T CONVEYER CO., Plaintiffs, v. SIX FLAGS, INC., SIX FLAGS THEME PARKS INC., SF PARTNERSHIP, TIERCO MARYLAND, INC., BUSCH ENTERTAINMENT CORP., CEDAR FAIR LP, PARAMOUNT PARKS, INC., NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, INC., BLACKSTONE GROUP L.P., THE WALT DISNEY CO. and WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS, LLC, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No. 07-127-***

DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT Defendants requested a 45-day extension of the time to respond to the two-patent Complaint because they are in the process of retaining counsel and require additional time to analyze the issues and prepare a response to the Complaint. (D.I. 18). Plaintiffs have opposed that routine request. (D.I. 19). Plaintiffs point to no prejudice from such an extension, and there is none. Plaintiffs' sole basis for opposing the requested extension is that it should be conditioned upon each of the defendants agreeing to meet with them individually regarding settlement during that 45-day period. There is no basis for plaintiffs' attempt to hold a routine extension of time hostage to settlement meetings. Nor is there any basis for plaintiffs to insist that each of the defendants engage in a settlement meeting immediately after having been served with an

Case 1:07-cv-00127-JJF

Document 20

Filed 03/29/2007

Page 2 of 3

unexpected lawsuit, before defendants have retained counsel, analyzed the issues, and responded to the Complaint. Defendants request that the Court grant their motion for a 45-day extension of time to respond to the Complaint. MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP /s/ Jack B. Blumenfeld Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) Rodger D. Smith II (#3778) 1201 N. Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 658-9200 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants Six Flags, Inc., Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., SF Partnership, Tierco Maryland, Inc., Cedar Fair LP, Paramount Parks Inc., NBC Universal, Inc., Universal Studios, Inc., Blackstone Group L.P., The Walt Disney Co. and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, LLC March 29, 2007
780391

2

Case 1:07-cv-00127-JJF

Document 20

Filed 03/29/2007

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 29, 2007, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of such filing to: Francis DiGiovanni, Esquire Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP Richard L. Horwitz, Esquire Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP I further certify that I caused copies of the foregoing document to be served on March 29, 2007, upon the following in the manner indicated: BY EMAIL AND HAND Francis DiGiovanni, Esquire Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP The Nemours Building 1007 North Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19801 [email protected] Richard L. Horwitz, Esquire Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor 1313 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 [email protected]

/s/ Jack B. Blumenfeld Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) [email protected]