Free Verdict Sheet - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 24.4 kB
Pages: 3
Date: August 27, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 485 Words, 3,077 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38025/168.pdf

Download Verdict Sheet - District Court of Delaware ( 24.4 kB)


Preview Verdict Sheet - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00190-SLR

Document 168

Filed 08/27/2008

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. SAINT-GOBAIN CERAMICS & PLASTICS, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No. 07-190 (SLR)

JOINT PROPOSED VERDICT SHEET Pursuant to D. Del. L.R. 51.1(c), the parties jointly submit the attached agreedupon Proposed Verdict Sheet, in triplicate. This document is also being submitted on disk in WordPerfect format. MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) Maryellen Noreika (#3208) 1201 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 658-9200 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A. Jesse A. Finkelstein (#1090) Jeffrey L. Moyer (#3309) Kelly E. Farnan (#4395) One Rodney Square Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 651-7700 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. OF COUNSEL: Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C. Charanjit Brahma Sean M. McEldowney KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 655 15th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-5793 (202) 879-5000 August 27, 2008 OF COUNSEL: Frederick L. Whitmer John Ohman THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 1002 (212) 603-2000

Case 1:07-cv-00190-SLR

Document 168

Filed 08/27/2008

Page 2 of 3

1. Do you find that Siemens has proven that Saint-Gobain has infringed either claim 1 or 2 of the `080 patent? YES _____ NO _____

If you answered "YES" to Question 1, then you should continue on and answer Question 2 and Question 3. If you answered "NO" to Question 1, then you should not answer Question 2 or Question 3 and you should advise the Court of your verdict. 2. What do you find to be the total amount of damages adequate to compensate Siemens for the infringement of the `080 patent. Total damages: 3. $___________________________________

Do you find that Saint-Gobain's infringement was willful? YES _____ NO _____

After you have completed these Questions, advise the Court of your verdict.

Case 1:07-cv-00190-SLR

Document 168

Filed 08/27/2008

Page 3 of 3

MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP

RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.

/s/ Maryellen Noreika
Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) Maryellen Noreika (#3208) 1201 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 658-9200 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

/s/ Kelly E. Farnan
Jesse A. Finkelstein (#1090) Jeffrey L. Moyer (#3309) Kelly E. Farnan (#4395) One Rodney Square Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 651-7700 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.

OF COUNSEL: Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C. Charanjit Brahma Sean M. McEldowney KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 655 15th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-5793 (202) 879-5000 August 27, 2008
2466231

OF COUNSEL: Frederick L. Whitmer John Ohman THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 1002 (212) 603-2000