Free Opening Brief in Support - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 10 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 11 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 12 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 13 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE VOITH PAPER GMBH & CO. KG, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSONFOILS, INC., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : :

C.A. No. 07-226-UNA

DEFENDANT, JOHNSONFOILS, INC.'S, ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS TO PLAINTIFF, VOITH PAPER GMBH & CO. KG'S, COMPLAINT Defendant, JohnsonFoils, Inc. ("JohnsonFoils"), by and through its

undersigned counsel, hereby responds to the allegations in Plaintiff, Voith Paper GmbH & Co. KG's ("Voith"), Complaint as follows, and asserts the following Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims. 1. 2. Denied. JohnsonFoils is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a

belief as to the truth of the allegations of this paragraph and denies the same. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Admitted. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied as a conclusion of law; however, it is admitted that

JohnsonFoils is a Delaware corporation.

1

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 16

8. 9. required. 10. required. 11. required. 12. required. 13. required. 14.

Denied. Denied as conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is

Denied as conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is

Denied as conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is

Denied as conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is

Denied as conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is

Denied as stated. It is admitted that formation is a part of the paper

making process. 15. JohnsonFoils is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a

belief as to the truth of the allegations of this paragraph and denies the same. 16. JohnsonFoils is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a

belief as to the truth of the allegations of this paragraph and denies the same. 17. required. 18. To the extent the paragraph is understood, it is denied; however, it is Denied as conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is

admitted that JohnsonFoils is engaged in designing and building improved drainage devices.

2

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 16

19. 20. 21.

Denied. Denied. Paragraph 21 of Voith's Complaint is a transitional paragraph to

which no response is required. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied.

JohnsonFoils further denies that Voith is entitled to any of the relief requested in its Prayer for Relief. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES First Affirmative Defense Voith fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Second Affirmative Defense JohnsonFoils has not infringed any claim of the Patents-in-Suit, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. Third Affirmative Defense Each of the Patents-in-Suit is invalid, unenforceable, and void for failure to comply with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.

3

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 16

Fourth Affirmative Defense Voith is barred by the doctrine of Prosecution History Estoppel from presenting a claim interpretation necessary to find infringement of any claim of the Patents-in-Suit. Fifth Affirmative Defense Voith has misused each of the Patents-in-Suit which renders each of them unenforceable, and Voith is precluded from obtaining any relief in this action due to its misuse. Sixth Affirmative Defense Voith's claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrine of equitable estoppel. Seventh Affirmative Defense Voith's claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrine of waiver. Eighth Affirmative Defense Voith's claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the statute of limitations. Ninth Affirmative Defense Voith's claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrine of laches. COUNTERCLAIMS Defendant and Counterclaimant, JohnsonFoils, Inc. ("JohnsonFoils"), hereby asserts the following counterclaims against Voith:

4

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 16

Parties 1. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant,

Voith Paper GmbH & Co. KG's ("Voith"), is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Germany, with its principal place of business at Sankt Poeltener Strasse 43, Heidenheim, Germany 89522. 2. Defendant and Counterclaimant, JohnsonFoils, is a corporation

organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. 3. Defendant and Counterclaimant, JohnsonFoils has its principal place

of business located at 40 Progress Avenue, Springfield, MA 01104. Jurisdiction and Venue 4. Voith has invoked the jurisdiction and venue of this Court by filing its

Complaint arising out of the same subject matter as JohnsonFoils' counterclaims. 5. 2202. 6. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400. Background 7. JohnsonFoils is in the business of researching, designing and Jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338, 1367, 2201 and

developing drainage equipment, cleaning systems, ceramic products and technology for the management of water removal and sheet formation on pulp and paper machines. 8. U.S. Patent No. 5,389,206 ("'206 Patent'") issued on February 14, 1995,

for a "TWIN WIRE FORMER". A copy of the `206 Patent is attached as Exhibit "A."

5

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 16

9.

U.S. Patent No. 5,500,091 ("'091 Patent'") issued on March 19, 1996,

for a "TWIN WIRE FORMER". A copy of the `091 Patent is attached as Exhibit "B." 10. U.S. Patent No. 5,853,544 ("'544 Patent'") issued on December 29, 1998

for a "TWIN WIRE FORMER". A copy of the '544 Patent is attached as Exhibit "C." 11. U.S. Patent No. 5,718,805 ("'805 Patent'") issued on February 17, 1998

for a "TWIN WIRE FORMER". A copy of the '805 Patent is attached as Exhibit "D." 12. U.S. Patent No. 5,972,168 ("'168 Patent'") issued on December 29, 1998

for a "TWIN WIRE FORMER". A copy of the '168 Patent is attached as Exhibit "E." 13. Upon information and belief, the assignment records of the United

States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") reflect ownership of the '805 Patent, the '168 Patent, the '206 Patent, the '091 Patent, and the '544 Patent (collectively referred to as "Voith's Twin Wire Former Patents") in the name of Voith. 14. The Voith's Twin Wire Former Patents are a single family of related

patents that share a common detailed description of the preferred embodiments and the same claim of priority to application Serial No. 07/773,965, filed as PCT/EP90/01313, which is now abandoned. 15. 8. On April 27, 2007, Voith filed a Complaint in the United States

District Court for the District of Delaware, C.A. No. 07-02226-JJF, alleging that JohnsonFoils infringed the `805 and `168 Patents-in-Suit. ("Patents-in-Suit"). 9. U.S. Patent Nos. 5,718,805 (`805 Patent) and 5,972,168 (`168 Patent),

(collectively hereinafter the "Patents-in-Suit") were attached as Exhibits "1" and "2" to Voith's Complaint.

6

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 16

16.

On August 24, 2007, JohnsonFoils filed requests for reexamination

with the PTO for the Patents-in-Suit. 17. On November 16, 2007 JohnsonFoils filed requests for reexamination

with the PTO for the '206; '091; and, '544 Patents. 18. Voith asserts that any JohnsonFoils twin wire former product that

utilizes a resiliently mounted blade is an "Accused Product" (see the definition of "Accused Product," on page 5 of Plaintiff's [Voith] First Set of Interrogatories to JohnsonFoils, Inc., Exhibit "F" to this Complaint) and it infringes Voith's Twin Wire Former Patents. 19. There is a substantial and continuing justiciable controversy between

Voith and JohnsonFoils regard JohnsonFoils' right to manufacture and sell twin wire formers having a resiliently mounted blade in view of Voith's Twin Wire Former Patents. First Counterclaim Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the Patents-in-Suit 20. 10. The allegations in Paragraphs 1-19 of JohnsonFoils' Counterclaims

are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 21. 11. An actual controversy requiring a declaration of rights by this

Court exists under the Patent Act between JohnsonFoils and Voith concerning the alleged infringement and the invalidity of the Patents-in-Suit. 22. 12. JohnsonFoils' counterclaim for declaratory relief is brought

pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, et seq. and 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq. 7

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 16

23.

13. JohnsonFoils has not and does not infringe, literally or under the

doctrine of equivalents, any claim of the Patents-in-Suit. 24. 14. JohnsonFoils has not induced and is not inducing infringement of

any claim of the Patents-in-Suit. 25. 15. JohnsonFoils' has not in the past and is not now contributing to the

infringement of any claim of the Patents-in-Suit. 26. 16. JohnsonFoils is entitled to a declaratory judgment that it has not

in the past infringed and is not now infringing any claim of the Patents-in-Suit. Second Counterclaim Declaratory Judgment that the Patents-in-Suit Are Invalid 27. 17. The allegations in Paragraphs 1-16 of JohnsonFoils' Counterclaims

are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 28. 29. 30. 31. 18. All claims of the Patents-in-Suit are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102. 19. All claims of the Patents-in-Suit are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 103. 20. All claims of the Patents-in-Suit are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112. 21. JohnsonFoils is entitled to a declaratory judgment that the all

claims of the Patents-in-Suit are invalid, unenforceable, and void pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.

8

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 10 of 16

Third Counterclaim Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the '206 Patent 32. The allegations in Paragraphs 1-19 of JohnsonFoils' Counterclaims are

incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 33. An actual controversy requiring a declaration of rights by this Court

exists under the Patent Act between JohnsonFoils and Voith concerning the alleged infringement and the invalidity of the '206 Patent. 34. JohnsonFoils' counterclaim for declaratory relief is brought pursuant

to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, et seq. and 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq. 35. JohnsonFoils has not and does not infringe, literally or under the

doctrine of equivalents, any claim of the '206 Patent. 36. JohnsonFoils has not induced and is not inducing infringement of any

claim of the '206 Patent. 37. JohnsonFoils' has not in the past and is not now contributing to the

infringement of any claim of the '206 Patent. 38. JohnsonFoils is entitled to a declaratory judgment that it has not in

the past infringed and is not now infringing any claim of the '206 Patent. Fourth Counterclaim Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the '091 Patent 39. The allegations in Paragraphs 1-26 of JohnsonFoils' Counterclaims are

incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.

9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 11 of 16

40.

An actual controversy requiring a declaration of rights by this Court

exists under the Patent Act between JohnsonFoils and Voith concerning the alleged infringement and the invalidity of the '091 Patent. 41. JohnsonFoils' counterclaim for declaratory relief is brought pursuant

to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, et seq. and 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq. 42. JohnsonFoils has not and does not infringe, literally or under the

doctrine of equivalents, any claim of the '091 Patent. 43. JohnsonFoils has not induced and is not inducing infringement of any

claim of the '091 Patent. 44. JohnsonFoils' has not in the past and is not now contributing to the

infringement of any claim of the '091 Patent. 45. JohnsonFoils is entitled to a declaratory judgment that it has not in

the past infringed and is not now infringing any claim of the '091 Patent. Fifth Counterclaim Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the '544 Patent 46. The allegations in Paragraphs 1-33 of JohnsonFoils' Counterclaims are

incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 47. An actual controversy requiring a declaration of rights by this Court

exists under the Patent Act between JohnsonFoils and Voith concerning the alleged infringement and the invalidity of the '544 Patent.

10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 12 of 16

48.

JohnsonFoils' counterclaim for declaratory relief is brought pursuant

to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, et seq. and 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq. 49. JohnsonFoils has not and does not infringe, literally or under the

doctrine of equivalents, any claim of the '544 Patent. 50. JohnsonFoils has not induced and is not inducing infringement of any

claim of the '544 Patent. 51. JohnsonFoils' has not in the past and is not now contributing to the

infringement of any claim of the '544 Patent. 52. JohnsonFoils is entitled to a declaratory judgment that it has not in

the past infringed and is not now infringing any claim of the '544 Patent. Sixth Counterclaim Declaratory Judgment that the '206 Patent Is Invalid 53. The allegations in Paragraphs 1-54 of JohnsonFoils' Counterclaims are

incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 54. 55. 56. 57. All claims of the '206 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102. All claims of the '206 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 103. All claims of the '206 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112. JohnsonFoils is entitled to a declaratory judgment that the all claims

of the '206 Patent is invalid, unenforceable, and void pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.

11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 13 of 16

Seventh Counterclaim Declaratory Judgment that the '091 Patent Is Invalid 58. The allegations in Paragraphs 1-59 of JohnsonFoils' Counterclaims are

incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 59. 60. 61. 62. All claims of the '091 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102. All claims of the '091 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 103. All claims of the '091 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112. JohnsonFoils is entitled to a declaratory judgment that the all claims

of the '091 Patent is invalid, unenforceable, and void pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq. Eighth Counterclaim Declaratory Judgment that the '544 Patent Is Invalid 63. The allegations in Paragraphs 1-64 of JohnsonFoils' Counterclaims are

incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 64. 65. 66. 67. All claims of the '544 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102. All claims of the '544 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 103. All claims of the '544 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112. JohnsonFoils is entitled to a declaratory judgment that the all claims

of the '544 Patent is invalid, unenforceable, and void pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.

12

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 14 of 16

Ninth Counterclaim Patent Misuse 68. 22. JohnsonFoils incorporates paragraphs 1-21 67of its Counterclaims

as if fully set forth herein. 69. 23. On information and belief, Voith has misused the Patents-in-Suit

by filing the present action against JohnsonFoils for patent infringement when Voith knew or should have known that JohnsonFoils was not infringing any permissible, reasonable or valid interpretation of any claim of the Patents-in-Suit. 70. 24. On information and belief, Voith's impermissible, unreasonable or

invalid interpretations of the claims of the Patents-in-Suit are interposed for the purposes of this suit and its anti-competitive effect. 71. 25. On information and belief, Voith knew or should have known of

existing prior art that was not before the United States Patent and Trademark Office during the prosecution of the applications leading to the Patents-in-Suit. 72. 26. On information and belief, that existing prior art is such that Voith

knew or should have known that the claims of the Patents-is-Suit were not patentable. 73. 27. On information and belief, that existing prior art is such that Voith

now knows or should have known that its interpretations of the claims of the Patents-in-Suit render them invalid. 74. 28. On information and belief, Voith knowingly ignored the existing impermissible, unreasonable or invalid

prior art so it could advance its

13

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 15 of 16

interpretations of the claims of the Patents-in-Suit and use them as a jurisdictional basis for this sham suit and its anti-competitive effects. 75. 29. Voith's assertion of impermissible, unreasonable or invalid

interpretations of the claims of the Patents-in-Suit is having an anti-competitive effect on JohnsonFoils.

RELIEF WHEREFORE, JohnsonFoils requests that this Court enter a judgment that: (a) Dismisses Voith's Complaint with prejudice and denies all of the relief

it requested therein; (b) Voith and all persons in active concert or participation with it are

enjoined from threatening or charging JohnsonFoils, its suppliers, customers or distributors with infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,389,206, 5,500,091, 5,853,544, 5,718,805 and 5,972,168; (c) JohnsonFoils its suppliers, customers and distributors are not liable

for any infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,389,206, 5,500,091, 5,853,544, 5,718,805 and 5,972,168; (d) That U.S. Patent Nos. 5,389,206, 5,500,091, 5,853,544, 5,718,805 and

5,972,168 are invalid, unenforceable, and void pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.; (e) (f) That Voith is not entitled to costs pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 288; Awards JohnsonFoils damages arising out of Voith's misuse of U.S.

Patent Nos. 5,389,206, 5,500,091, 5,853,544, 5,718,805 and 5,972,168;

14

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-2

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 16 of 16

(g)

This is an exceptional case entitling JohnsonFoils to an award of its

attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285; (h) That JohnsonFoils is entitled to prejudgment interest and post-

judgment interest on the above damages awards; and (i) Such other and further relief as this Court may deem appropriate.

JURY TRIAL DEMAND A trial by jury is demanded. Respectfully submitted, Dated: _____________________ _________________________________ George H. Seitz, III (DE #667) Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, P.A. 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 P.O. Box 68 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 888-7602 Anthony S. Volpe John J. O'Malley Randolph J. Huis Ryan W. O'Donnell Volpe and Koenig, P.C. United Plaza, Suite 1600 30 South 17th Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 568-6400 Attorneys for Defendant JohnsonFoils, Inc.

15

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-3

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-3

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-3

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-3

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-3

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-3

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-3

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-3

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-3

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-3

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 10 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-4

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-4

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-4

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-4

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-4

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-4

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-4

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-4

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-4

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-4

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 10 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-4

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 11 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-5

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-5

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-5

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-5

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-5

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-5

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-5

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-5

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-5

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-5

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 10 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-6

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-6

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-6

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-6

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-6

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-6

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-6

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-6

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-6

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-7

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-7

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-7

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-7

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-7

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-7

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-7

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-7

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-7

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-7

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 10 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-8

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 9

EXHIBIT G

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-8

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-8

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-8

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-8

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-8

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-8

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-8

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-8

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-9

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 3

EXHIBIT H

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-9

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-9

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 17

EXHIBIT I

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 10 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 11 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 12 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 13 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 14 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 15 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 16 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-10

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 17 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-11

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 3

EXHIBIT J

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-11

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-11

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-12

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 10

EXHIBIT K

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-12

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-12

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-12

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-12

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-12

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-12

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-12

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-12

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-12

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 10 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-13

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 11

EXHIBIT L

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-13

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-13

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-13

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-13

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-13

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-13

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-13

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-13

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-13

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 10 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-13

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 11 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-14

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 11

EXHIBIT M

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-14

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-14

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-14

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-14

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-14

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-14

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-14

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 8 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-14

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 9 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-14

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 10 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-14

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 11 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-15

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 7

EXHIBIT N

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-15

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-15

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 3 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-15

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 4 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-15

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 5 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-15

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 6 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-00226-JJF

Document 55-15

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 7 of 7