Free Status Report - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 18.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 14, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 686 Words, 4,640 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38173/55.pdf

Download Status Report - District Court of Delaware ( 18.9 kB)


Preview Status Report - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00241-JJF

Document 55

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PRE SOLUTIONS, INC., a Georgia corporation, Plaintiff, v. BLACKHAWK NETWORK, INC., formerly known as and doing business as BLACKHAWK MARKETING SERVICES, INC., an Arizona corporation; and SAFEWAY, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No. 07-241 (JJF) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PARTIES' JOINT STATUS REPORT Pursuant to paragraph 7 of the Court's August 9, 2007 Scheduling Order, the parties hereby submit their Joint Status Report in anticipation of the February 28, 2008 Status Conference. A. 1. Discovery Plaintiff Pre Solutions, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Safeway, Inc. and

Blackhawk Network, Inc. ("Defendants") have each served on each other written discovery requests, including interrogatories, requests for admissions and requests for production of documents. 2. Defendants have responded to Plaintiff's written discovery requests and have

produced documents in response to Plaintiff's document demands. Plaintiff has sent several letters detailing deficiencies it believes exist in the responses and document production made by Defendants thus far. If these issues are not resolved informally, Plaintiff intends to file a Motion

Case 1:07-cv-00241-JJF

Document 55

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 2 of 3

to Compel. 3. Plaintiff's responses to the written discovery served by Defendants are due in the

ordinary course by March 3, 2008, though Defendants have pre-approved a two-week extension for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' discovery requests if needed in light of Plaintiff's earlier agreement to grant Defendants a two-week extension to respond to Plaintiff's discovery requests. If Plaintiff's discovery responses are deficient and efforts to resolve any deficiencies informally are unsuccessful, Defendant may file a Motion to Compel. 4. Plaintiffs and Defendants have both served deposition notices for all depositions

they currently anticipate taking, though each side reserves their right to notice additional depositions. None of the depositions have been conducted thus far. 5. The current discovery cut-off date is March 10, 2008. However, on February 1,

2008, the parties received notice that this matter was being transferred to the docket of Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Therefore, the parties anticipate that the schedule may change but have not received any notice of any such change at this time. 6. As discussed below, the parties are actively engaged in settlement discussions and

may jointly request a modest modification to the discovery schedule in order to allow the parties time to reach an informal resolution of this matter and avoid the expense of burdensome discovery. B. Settlement Discussions The parties have been engaged in active settlement negotiations throughout the pendency of this case, including the exchange of a large amount of documents and information and numerous telephone conferences involving key business people familiar with disputed factual issues. Discussions concerning a potential informal resolution of this case are continuing.

-2-

Case 1:07-cv-00241-JJF

Document 55

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 3 of 3

Defendants made a formal written settlement offer on January 31, 2008, to which Plaintiff will be responding soon. C. Motion Practice If the case does not settle, Plaintiff anticipates filing a Motion for Summary Judgment or Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by the current dispositive motion cut-off of May 23, 2008. POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP

By: /s/ Jennifer Gimler Brady Richard L. Horwitz (Del. Bar 2246) Jennifer Gimler Brady (Del. Bar. 2874) Hercules Plaza, Sixth Floor 1313 North Market Street P.O. Box 951 Wilmington, Delaware 19899-0951 (302) 984-6000 ­ Telephone (302) 658-1192 ­ Facsimile [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Pre Solutions, Inc.

By: /s/ John P. DiTomo S. Mark Hurd (#3297) John P. DiTomo (#4850) 1201 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 (302) 658-9200 ­ Telephone (302) 658-3989 ­ Facsimile [email protected] ­ Email [email protected] - Email Attorneys for Defendants

OF COUNSEL: OF COUNSEL: Michael L. Turrill Michael L. Resch HOWREY LLP 550 S. Hope Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 892-1804 ­ Telephone (213) 892-2300 ­ Facsimile Dated: February 14, 2008
848587v1 / 31061

John P. Phillips Jason K. Sonoda PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 55 Second Street Twenty-Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 (415) 855-7000 - Telephone

-3-