Free Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

n Case 1 :07—cv—00344-GIVIS Document 10 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 1 of 4
_ Case 1:07-cv-00344-GMS Document 9 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
F l i. E D
DENNIS WATSON, ) ` ` i
)
Piaamarr, ) _ __,__ ,300 2 7 7007 I
v. ) Civ. No. 07-344-GMS us. mstmct count ’
) DISTFHCT OF DELAWARE I
WILMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, )
et. al., )
D
Defendants. )
ORDER
WHEREAS, Dennis Watson (°“Watson"), was a prisoner incarcerated at the Howard R.
Young Correctional Institution, Wilmington, Delaware, at the time he filed this 42 U.S.C. §
I983 lawsuit, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
l9I 5; l
WHEREAS, on June 7, 2007, the court entered an order and granted Watson leave to
proceed in forma pauperts, assessing a filing fee of $350, and on July 2, 2007, entered an order
requiring Watson to submit his payment authorization form within 30 days (D.1. 4, 7);
g WHEREAS, the July 2, 2007 order was returned as undeliverable and the envelope
indicated that Watson has been released from prison;
WHEREAS, under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, release does not eliminate the
obligation of payment of a filing fee that could and should have been met from the trust account
while imprisonment continued. Robbins v. Switzer, 104 F.3d 895, 899 (7“‘ Cir. 1997); see also
Drayer v. Attorney General, Nos. 03—25l7, 03-ig] 8, Sl Fed. Appx. 429 (3d Cir. 2003).
THEREFORE, at Wilmington this day ofécugust, 2007, IT IS HEREBY
$?$€ia·¤03¢(`

Case 1 :07—cv—00344-GIVIS Document 10 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-00344-GMS Document 9 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 2 of2
ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of this order, Watson shall either pay the filing
fee owed ($350.00) or submit a new standard form application to proceed without prepayment of
fees and affidavit so that the court may determine whether he is still eligible to proceed in forma
pauperis. O
NOTE: Failure to timely comply with this order shall result in dismissal of this case
without prejudice. _ -
. ‘ =__
l ` 1. __
H ED STATES ISTRI J DG
F I L E D
S12? 2 4 EGG?
oigiaiiiinididiinisiigiixgga
2

Case1:07-cv—00344-GMS D0cument10 Filed 09/27/2007 Page30f4
EQ
Edo?
I-
EQ:
E5
mc Ba:
LU LL|§
cm $5 §
Z O •|¤·-1
LU Ed *·‘
<¤ 2z.@, .43
E M;
z Lu _
DS ;¤0 {G
E z~"*·@ .5 ——————
5 4-*
g§$ § S
O gg
0 g O
‘~_¤` v-Ng
00 0*0
\
/ Qmmm?
J»· ’
WE
*:"‘¥
2%
xwég an
§*GS·—$
QQEQQ z
¤.a_5Jc¤g
£Q§§ m
6•.•£*_,»-1 .1

Emfg {
:>¤2>€·¤-:.3 0
*gz.E -
:;§.
°°E

Case 1 :07—cv—00344-GIVIS Document 10 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 4 of 4
II ‘i?"‘ , YYQ :‘
'·7_Q r-~ +·":#
‘
‘· ’<`[ $3* fi? 1
4 ci; -@ #2% #4. ·· J:
ar} J _ } 3:- {fi rp, ·‘’` lm.
‘=rP· ” L-i` 1- ul.
:
. ifu T- iw :
1 1-·v<*·»`m *--1
1 . - = .
` ` :
1 »!]’=*Il€ VI`.-`-'E°‘ ` wy _ :
K': 1.-i#;§?`L.@§ ‘/’1‘1 "* E
' 2 _i/M ‘1‘»· ‘ V1 ? -_ Z
I.·;»·*_,f`,_·}`,." F;_;`l_¤_:' if ·
A Q;T/.; Y gg! gy. C lj KE
1-;,:} ;= *5 2
` ·,-‘- 1 4; J? Z
` ;f'1j{°r'l‘?{—·1[g'Y··] ;·V,"E1'*T U E 2
' I-' ¤·` {`· .¤r»e§· V.! ·
` V ¢/I I
V
3 252
1 7 $;& ; §¤mr/hl:
1 2 ` . _ gxmmx
. .1 ~ ¢~¤#¤
E ' Ȥ;2*
; Z SEG
1 · E$=§:
, m A 1 -. ,4 ¤- Eng.:
¢ wéfsii W 2ti"’··-=
¢ ee- E =:e;=
Z my , — I
¤ -—~ mgmm
· ST- ax- E
M 5 4 O U,
1 Kg 5% ,,,
1 ES G ®
{_ ` "" »- l V
2 Q 2 @5 § 55 ;,. é` ; .-
; »¤ @
; { ag -1 =;; on
1 ““ § E iq E
@ ‘ 4 e ¤ == Q ···
5 1 ~& E ¤ ::.1 ?
2 -; ‘ 4
Z
1 1 ?-f§§g* .
j g ` 3 2 1
; ..2:; Y&@er;
; *5 N "P ·`·4· ‘L
, Q o we {TQ? _
{ ,,4 U ·¤ 2 W **-**3 J";.
· u M cx gg »i">, Y"?
· 2 *5 ° ··* m r
. Q vg 5 S E .,:5: 1
U _Q J g g V
’5 Q 3 3 =¤
g wb u 4 ’
S ¤= cn s
8 S M ·— U
e=~5 S E
IL
* O `§ . Fo 0
·g Z .E V
:> ,3% ,§
B