Free Motion for Bond - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 47.5 kB
Pages: 8
Date: September 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,307 Words, 8,196 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38431/30.pdf

Download Motion for Bond - District Court of Delaware ( 47.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Bond - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cr-00073-SLR

Document 30

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER WATERMAN, Defendant.

: : : : : : : : :

Criminal Action No. 07-73-SLR

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR BAIL PENDING APPEAL BY GOVERNMENT Defendant, Christopher Waterman, by and through his undersigned counsel, Edson A. Bostic, Federal Public Defender for the District of Delaware, respectfully requests that this Court, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142, enter an Order releasing him on bail pending the Government's appeal of this Court's April 30, 2008 Order suppressing physical evidence in this matter. In support of this Motion, Mr. Waterman avers as follows: 1. On May 14, 2007, a Criminal Complaint was filed against Mr. Waterman regarding his May 12, 2007 arrest, and he was arraigned before Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge. 2. On June 5, 2007 a Grand Jury for the District of Delaware indicted Mr. Waterman for knowingly possessing with the intent to distribute more than five grams of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), knowingly carrying and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A), and knowingly possessing a firearm that has been transported in interstate commerce to Delaware, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 924 (a)(2). Mr. Waterman was detained pending trial. 3. On September 21, 2007, Mr. Waterman filed a Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence and

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cr-00073-SLR

Document 30

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 2 of 5

Statements. On November 30, 2007, this Court held an evidentiary hearing on Mr. Waterman's motion, and the parties subsequently submitted post-hearing briefs in support of their respective positions. 4. On April 30, 2008, this Court entered a memorandum opinion granting Mr. Waterman's motion in its entirety, and suppressing all physical and statement evidence that resulted from his arrest. Thereafter, the Court conducted a status conference on May 8, 2008. During that conference, the Government indicated that it was reviewing the Court's decision with Main Justice to determine whether it would file a notice of appeal, because it could not proceed against Mr. Waterman since the motion to suppress was granted. On May 23, 2008, the Government filed a Notice of Appeal. 5. Mr. Waterman now files the instant motion for bail pending appeal by the Government. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142, a defendant may be released pending trial, and the court may impose a condition or combination of conditions to reasonably assure his or her appearance as required, and that the defendant will not endanger the safety of any person or the community. Id. 6. Additionally, 18 U.S.C. § 3143(c) provides: Release or detention pending appeal by the government. The judicial officer shall treat a defendant in a case in which an appeal has been taken by the United States under Section 3731 of this title, in accordance with section 3142 of this title, unless the defendant is otherwise subject to a release or detention order. Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the judicial officer, in a case in which an appeal has been taken by the United States under section 3742, shall­ (1) if the person has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment, order that person detained; and (2) in any other circumstances, release or detain the person under section 3142. Id. 2

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cr-00073-SLR

Document 30

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 3 of 5

7.

Mr. Waterman believes that under the circumstances and current status of the

Government's prosecution against him, this Court should consider granting his release pending determination of the Government's appeal. 8. It should be noted that Mr. Waterman, who is 26, has been incarcerated since May 14, 2007, one year since his initial arrest. He is a lifelong resident of Wilmington, Delaware, and has lived at 808 N. Monroe Street since 1992. Mr. Waterman also has a child that he supported prior to his detention. 9. If released, he will again reside with his mother at 808 N. Monroe Street in Wilmington, Delaware. 10. Upon pretrial release, Mr. Waterman will begin full-time employment at Fran & Ceil's Soul Food Restaurant in Wilmington. See Exhibit 1(confirming Mr. Waterman's employment).1 11. During his year-long pretrial detention in this matter, Mr. Waterman has maintained a good record at Salem County Prison, where he is confined. He has also attended classes and obtained his GED. 12. Although the offenses for which Mr. Waterman is charged, particularly 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (carrying a firearm in connection with a drug trafficking crime) ordinarily carry a rebuttable presumption in favor of detention, the Government's case and the allegations against Mr. Waterman are on much different footing because all evidence that gave rise to the offenses have been suppressed by the Court. 13. Since any evidence that would support the rebuttable presumption has been suppressed

Mr. Waterman's work hours would be from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m., six days a week, if permitted by the Court. 3

1

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cr-00073-SLR

Document 30

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 4 of 5

by the Court, the presumption is overcome. See United States v. Jay, F.Supp.2d 1235, 1239 (D. Oregon 2003) (Brown, J.) ("[a]ny presumption against release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) is overcome because the Court suppressed the evidence . . . .") 14. Without the rebuttable presumption, there are conditions of release that will assure Mr. Waterman's appearance at future proceedings and the safety of the community. Such conditions may include that: (i) Mr. Waterman reside with his mother at 808 N. Monroe Street, Wilmington, Delaware; (ii) Mr. Waterman report twice weekly, in person, and/or daily, telephonically if required, to his pretrial officer; (iii) Mr. Waterman accept the employment offered to him at Fran & Ceil's Soul Food Restaurant and maintain that or other employment during any period of pretrial release; (iv) Mr. Waterman be placed on curfew which requires him to be in his residence between 9:30 p.m. through 7:00 a.m.; (v) Mr. Waterman must refrain from the illegal use and/or possession of controlled substance and abstain from over-indulgence in the use of alcohol; (vi) Mr. Waterman be subjected to random urinalysis; and/or (vii) Mr. Waterman be subjected to electronic monitoring.

4

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cr-00073-SLR

Document 30

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 5 of 5

WHEREFORE, Mr. Waterman respectfully requests that this Court grant his Motion for Bail Pending Appeal by Government.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Edson A. Bostic Edson A. Bostic, Esquire Federal Public Defender Attorney for Christopher Waterman Federal Public Defender's Office One Customs House 704 King Street, Suite 110 Wilmington, DE 19801 302-573-6010 [email protected]

Dated: May 30, 2008

5

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cr-00073-SLR

Document 30-2

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cr-00073-SLR

Document 30-2

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 2 of 2

Case 1:07-cr-00073-SLR

Document 30-3

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER WATERMAN, Defendant.

: : : : : : : : :

Criminal Action No. 07-73-SLR

ORDER AND NOW, this ____ day of __________, 2008, upon consideration of the Defendant's Motion for Bail Pending Appeal by Government, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The defendant shall be released subject to the following conditions imposed by this Court: ______________________________________________________________________________.

BY THE COURT:

Honorable Sue L. Robinson United States District Court Judge

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com