Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 1 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 2 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 3 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 4 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 5 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 6 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 7 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 8 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 9 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 10 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 11 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 12 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 13 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 14 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 15 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 16 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 17 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 18 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-2
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-2
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-2
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-2
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-2
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-2
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-2
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-2
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-2
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-2
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-2
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 11 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-3
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN RE COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL ) CORPORATION DERIVATIVE ) LITIGATION ) ____________________________________) ) THIS RELATES TO ALL ACTIONS ) ____________________________________)
C.A. No. 07-372-SLR(MPT) (Consolidated Action)
DECLARATION OF ALEXANDER ARNOLD GERSHON IN OPPOSITION TO POST-MERGER MOTION TO DISMISS I, ALEXANDER ARNOLD GERSHON, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that the following is true and correct. 1. I am a member of the bar of the State of New York and an inactive member
of the bar of the State of Georgia. I am a partner in the firm of Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, and we are of counsel to the plaintiffs in this action. 2. I make this declaration in opposition to defendants' post-merger motion to
dismiss this action. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true copy of the Individual Defendants'
Notice of Motion and Motion For Judgment On the Pleadings Concerning Plaintiffs' Derivative Claims; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. This motion was made in In re Countrywide Financial Corp. Derivative Litigation, 07-cv06923-MRP (MANx) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. I obtained it online from the Central District of California PACER website. Dated: New York, New York August 1, 2008
/s Alexander Arnold Gershon Alexander Arnold Gershon
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-4
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-00372-SLR
Document 69-4
Filed 08/01/2008
Page 2 of 2