Free Complaint - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 4,769.9 kB
Pages: 80
Date: September 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 6,905 Words, 45,441 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38489/1.pdf

Download Complaint - District Court of Delaware ( 4,769.9 kB)


Preview Complaint - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 1 of 30

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE QSOFT CONSULTING LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. TEDDY TONG and TDTONG LTD., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No._________( ) ) ) )

)

VERIFIED COMPLAINT Plaintiff QSoft Consulting Limited ("Plaintiff," or "QSoft"), by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby brings the following Verified Complaint against Defendants Teddy Tong ("Tong") and tdtong ltd (collectively, "Defendants"), and states as follows: SUMMARY OF ACTION 1. QSoft is the world's leading provider of online gay and lesbian oriented

services. QSoft owns and operates several online communities where QSoft members can meet, chat, or access other Internet-based services. Since November 2006 and

continuing through the date of filing, QSoft has been receiving complaints from its members about being targeted by recurring, unsolicited commercial messages. These unsolicited messages are being sent by Tong and promote websites, which are registered to Defendants, and which offer services in direct competition with QSoft's online services and infringe on QSoft's protected GAYDAR mark. QSoft files this action to enjoin Defendants from continuing their ongoing illegal and injurious conduct and for actual damages suffered as a result of such conduct.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

1

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 2 of 30

PARTIES AND VENUE 2. QSoft is a private British corporation having its principal place of

business at Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 4EG, United Kingdom. 3. Upon information and belief, Defendants are residents of New Jersey,

with a claimed address in Princeton, New Jersey, and are the registrants of record for the following Infringing Domain Names: , ,

, and (the "Infringing Domain Names"), each of which have been registered through Estdomains Inc. (the "Registrar"). In addition,

Defendants are the registrants of , which was registered through GoDaddy.com. Attached collectively as Exhibit A are true and correct print-outs of the public WHOIS records evidencing Defendants' registration of these domain names. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the

Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1121 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a) and 1338(b), the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography Act (the "CAN-SPAM Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 7706(f)(7), and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030. This Court also has supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims included herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367, as such claims are so related to the claims over which this Court has original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy. 5. Defendant Teddy Tong has submitted himself to the jurisdiction of this

Court by registering the Infringing Domain Names with Estdomains Inc., a Delaware corporation.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

2

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 3 of 30

6.

Defendant tdtong ltd. has submitted itself the jurisdiction of this Court

by registering the Infringing Domain Names with Estdomains Inc., a Delaware corporation. 7. Upon information and belief, Defendants solicit, transact and do

business within this Judicial District. Defendants have also maintained systematic and continuous contacts with Delaware via the email and Internet-related violations described below. 8. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because a

substantial portion of the events giving rise to the claims pled herein occurred in this Judicial District and, upon information and belief, Defendants do business in this Judicial District. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. 10. QSoft was incorporated on November 27, 1997. QSoft is a technology company with a network of complimentary media

brands/marks that include the world's leading gay and lesbian dating websites and an online digital radio station. 11. QSoft's media brands/marks include GAYDAR and RAINBOW

NETWORK, as well as the related URLs , , , , and

, (collectively, the "GAYDAR websites"). 12. To date, QSoft has registered and maintains approximately 116 domain

names through which its online services are accessible. A complete list of QSoft's domain names is attached as Exhibit B.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

3

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 4 of 30

13.

Since November 1999, QSoft has been extensively involved in the

development of interactive online services for the gay and lesbian community. 14. Since November 1999, QSoft has supplied online dating services for the

gay and lesbian community under the media brand/mark GAYDAR. 15. QSoft's network of websites serves more than 300 million page

impressions per month to over three million registered and audited users ("Gaydar Members"). 16. Of its three million registered and audited users, approximately 409,026

are residents of the United States. QSOFT'S MARKS AND REGISTRATIONS 17. QSoft first adopted its GAYDAR mark in May 1999, when the domain

name was registered. 18. In 2001, QSoft applied to register GAYDAR as a trademark in the

European Community. On January 9, 2003, QSoft registered GAYDAR as a trademark in the European Community. 19. 20. 2001. 21. 22. 2004. 23. 2003. QSoft registered the domain name on March 31, QSoft registered the domain name on June 9, 2004. QSoft registered the domain name on February 13, QSoft registered the domain name on May 15, 1999. QSoft registered the domain name on November 30,

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

4

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 5 of 30

24. 6, 1998. 25. 2001. 26.

QSoft registered the domain name on February

QSoft registered the domain name on September 19,

QSoft currently operates its online dating and chat services business

through the domain names: , and . QSoft has entered into an affiliate relationship with Cruz N'Cub Publishing Inc. ("Cruz") who directs webtraffic to QSoft's domain name via the domain name. 27. QSoft operates its GAYDAR websites under the GAYDAR mark. Cruz

operates the website under a license of the GAYDAR mark granted by QSoft. USE OF THE GAYDAR WEBSITES 28. The Internet-related services offered by QSoft on the GAYDAR

Websites include access to other GAYDAR websites, the ability to send and receive electronic communications to and from other Gaydar Members, and other features such as chat rooms, online content, or online applications offered from time to time by QSoft in connection with the GAYDAR Websites. 29. "CupidoCam." 30. QSoft personnel expend significant time and energy to minimize any QSoft provides advertising for a webcam service known as

disruption to its services and members by indiscriminate and unauthorized mass mailings of unsolicited commercial email ("spam").

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

5

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 6 of 30

31.

QSoft regulates its GAYDAR websites and service in part by strictly

prohibiting the sending of spam through the GAYDAR websites. QSoft also prohibits any automated use of its system, such as the use of scripts, bots, or other executable programs that, among other things, may alter a user's experience and damage QSoft's computer network. 32. QSoft's prohibitions of unsolicited commercial messages, registration of

multiple user accounts per individual, submission of false registration information, and promotion of other commercial products or services are set forth in its contracts with its users. QSoft's contract with Gaydar Members is referred to as the Gaydar Website Membership Terms and Conditions ("Terms and Conditions"). QSoft's current Terms and Conditions are publicly posted on its website at http://gaydar.co.uk. A true and correct copy of QSoft's current Terms and Conditions is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 33. QSoft's Terms and Conditions specifically prohibit Gaydar Members

from advertising or promoting the user's or a third-party's products or services in any manner without QSoft's permission. 34. QSoft's Terms and Conditions govern the use of the GAYDAR

websites, and in order to become a Gaydar Member, communicate with other Gaydar Members, and make use of the services provided by QSoft, a user must first agree to be bound by the Terms and Conditions before being allowed to register for an account. QSOFT'S PROMOTION OF GAYDAR WEBSITES 35. QSoft's online dating services business is advertised on its GAYDAR

websites and through other QSoft domain names.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

6

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 7 of 30

36.

QSoft has engaged in extensive national and international advertising on

the Internet, in newspapers, and on radio stations in the United States. 37. During 2005, QSoft spent $124,145.00 advertising and promoting the

GAYDAR mark and websites in the United States alone. Examples of QSoft's United States print advertisements are attached hereto as Exhibit D. 38. QSoft has also developed search engine optimization strategies to

maximize its visibility on the Internet. 39. As a result of its superior customer service, competitive pricing, and

extensive advertising, QSoft now operates some of the largest gay and lesbian oriented lifestyle and dating websites in the world. 40. Advertisers who wish to target the affluent gay and lesbian community

do so through QSoft's GAYDAR websites. 41. The GAYDAR mark has come to represent QSoft's goodwill and

recognition as a leading source of online dating services in the industry and with consumers in the United States, the United Kingdom, and throughout the world. 42. The GAYDAR mark therefore has grown to become one of the biggest

and most recognized brands in the global gay and lesbian marketplace. DEFENDANTS' UNLAWFUL AND INFRINGING ACTIVITIES 43. On or about November 22, 2006, QSoft discovered that the Infringing

Domain Names , , and were linked to chat room messages sent from registered user accounts on .

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

7

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 8 of 30

44.

The accounts at issue are registered to Defendant Tong.

See Exhibit A. Tong has registered numerous user names including, among others, "speciallyexult" and "bargeincidence". 45. Upon information and belief, the accounts at issue were

fraudulently created for the specific purpose of sending unsolicited commercial messages to Gaydar Members. 46. The accounts registered to Tong have sent, since as

early as November 21, 2006, hundreds of unsolicited commercial messages to Gaydar Members. 47. The unsolicited commercial messages advertise and link Gaydar

Members to the Infringing Domain Name websites , , and . All of the messages sent by Tong violate the consumer protection provisions of the CAN-SPAM Act. 48. As soon as Tong's spamming attacks began, QSoft took immediate

action to block his illegal activities, by, among other things, sending Defendants a cease and desist letter on November 24, 2006 thereby notifying them that the unsolicited commercial chat room messages are illegal and advising Tong that he would be liable to QSoft for damages resulting therefrom. Additionally, upon learning that Tong had

registered a different physical address with GoDaddy.com, QSoft sent a second cease and desist letter to all of his purported physical and electronic addresses. True and correct copies of the cease and desist letters are collectively attached hereto as Exhibit E.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

8

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 9 of 30

49.

The spam messages were sent from Tong's multiple fraudulently created

accounts to create the false impression that the messages came from other individual users and Gaydar Members rather than an individual unaffiliated with QSoft. 50. Defendants are direct competitors of QSoft. Among other domain

names, Tong is the owner of which refers Internet traffic to iFriends.net and other adult oriented webcam "chat room" websites. Examples of Tong's use of to refer traffic to iFriends.net are attached as Exhibit F. 51. Defendants are using the Infringing Domain Names in, or for the

promotion of, online gay and lesbian oriented dating and webcam services that directly compete with QSoft and CupidoCam. 52. Defendants are not affiliated with QSoft and, as a result, are not

authorized to use the GAYDAR mark. 53. Defendants have used the GAYDAR mark in connection with their

spamming and infringing activities, including their commercial advertisements for their Infringing Domain Names and corresponding websites. Defendants' activities dilute, tarnish, and otherwise diminish the value of the GAYDAR mark. 54. Defendants have no legitimate reason to use QSoft's GAYDAR mark in

connection with their competing online gay and lesbian oriented dating, webcam, or chat room services businesses. 55. At all relevant times, Defendants have been aware that their use of

QSoft's GAYDAR mark for their commercial endeavors was not authorized by QSoft. Defendant Tong has also been aware that he was prohibited from spamming GAYDAR website users with his illegal messages.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

9

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 10 of 30

56.

Defendant Tong's willfulness is evident from, among other things, the

fact that all the messages were sent in violation of the Terms and Conditions. 57. Defendant Tong's willfulness is also evident from the fact that Tong has

continued to send unsolicited commercial messages after receiving both of QSoft's cease and desist letters. 58. Defendant Tong's willfulness is further evidenced by his use of multiple

apparently false street addresses in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(3), which provides that a presumption of willfulness is created when one provides materially false contact information to a domain name registrar. See Exhibit A. 59. Defendants' conduct was, and is, intentional, willful, and designed to

unlawfully misappropriate QSoft's goodwill and reputation and also to unfairly divert QSoft's potential business to Defendants' businesses. RESULTING HARM TO QSOFT 60. In being duped into delivering multiple illegal, automated commercial

messages initiated by Defendant Tong to Gaydar Members via chat rooms, QSoft has incurred and continues to incur substantial bandwidth and delivery-related costs. QSoft has also been forced to devote time, money and resources to the problems caused by Defendants' harmful and ongoing activities. 61. Defendants' use of , , and

has damaged QSoft by causing actual confusion and likelihood of confusion in the marketplace, in that consumers mistakenly believe that the GAYDAR websites are affiliated with, or are a sponsor of, Defendants' Infringing Domain Names and corresponding websites. Such confusion damages QSoft's reputation and goodwill.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

10

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 11 of 30

Such confusion also dilutes and diminishes the value of the famous GAYDAR mark by associating it with Defendant Tong's spamming activities. Attached as Exhibit G is one example of an e-mail written by a confused Gaydar Member believing that the spam messages originated from QSoft or one of the GAYDAR websites. 62. Defendants' wrongful acts have resulted in substantial harm to QSoft in

its reputation, loss of goodwill, loss of profits, reduced server capacity, employee costs, attorneys' fees, and other pecuniary damages. Attached as Exhibit H is one example of an e-mail written by an irate Gaydar Member who believed that the spam messages were sent (or could have been sent) by QSoft or one its GAYDAR websites. 63. Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendants will continue their activities

thereby causing further immediate and irreparable harm to QSoft. COUNT I Violation of the CAN-SPAM ACT (15 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq.) 64. QSoft realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 63

as if fully set forth herein. 65. By the aforementioned conduct, Defendant Tong has committed

actionable violations of the CAN-SPAM Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq. 66. Defendant Tong has violated 15 U.S.C. § 7704(a)(1) which prohibits the

initiation of the transmission, to a protected computer, of a commercial electronic mail message that contained or was accompanied by header information that was materially false or misleading. Among other things, Defendant violated Section 7704(a)(1) by using false or fraudulent pretenses to obtain multiple accounts that he

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

11

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 12 of 30

specifically agreed would not be used for commercial purposes, which he then used to spam Gaydar Members to promote his own commercial endeavors. 67. Tong has engaged in a pattern or practice of misconduct involving

repeated instances of misconduct in violation of the CAN-SPAM Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7704(a)(2). Defendant has repeatedly transmitted commercial messages while having knowledge, or knowledge fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances, that the subject heading of the message would likely mislead a recipient, acting reasonably under the circumstances, about a material fact regarding the contents or subject matter of the message. Among other things, Defendant Tong mislead QSoft's members by utilizing an automated robot to simulate human conversation. 68. Tong has engaged in a pattern or practice of misconduct involving

repeated instances of misconduct in violation of the CAN-SPAM Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7704(a)(3). Tong has repeatedly transmitted unsolicited, electronic commercial messages that did not comply with the consumer protection provisions of the CAN-SPAM Act. Among other things, the Spam messages that Tong sent to Gaydar Members failed to include a functional electronic return address or any other mechanism, conspicuously displayed or otherwise, which the recipient could use to request not to receive any future commercial messages from Tong. 69. Tong has engaged in a pattern or practice of misconduct involving

repeated instances of misconduct in violation of the CAN-SPAM Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7704(a)(4). These violations involve, among other things, continuing to transmit

unsolicited commercial messages regarding his commercial endeavors more than ten business days after receiving requests from the recipients of these messages not to receive

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

12

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 13 of 30

such messages in the future, and by continuing to send the unsolicited messages to Gaydar Members despite QSoft's request, on behalf of its customers, not to do so. 70. Tong has engaged in a pattern or practice of misconduct involving

repeated instances of misconduct in violation of the CAN-SPAM Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7704(a)(5). These violations have involved, among other things, failing to include a clear and conspicuous identification that the spam messages sent to Gaydar Members from the fraudulently obtained accounts were advertisements and solicitations for his commercial endeavors, failing to include with his Spam messages to Gaydar Members a clear and conspicuous notice of the user's opportunity to opt out or to decline further commercial messages from Defendant, and/or failing to include with his Spam messages to Gaydar Members a valid physical postal address. 71. Defendant Tong has engaged in all of the aforementioned actions

willfully, and with actual knowledge or knowledge fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances. 72. As a result of Defendant Tong's acts, QSoft has suffered, and continues

to suffer, irreparable injury, loss of reputation, and pecuniary damages including actual damages in an amount to be proven at trial and statutory damages trebled for willfulness. QSoft is also entitled to recover attorneys' fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 7706. 73. Unless enjoined by this Court, Tong will continue these acts, causing

QSoft further and immediate irreparable harm.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

13

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 14 of 30

COUNT II Cybersquatting Under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)) 74. QSoft realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 63

as if fully set forth herein. 75. The Infringing Domain Names ,

and are identical or confusingly similar to QSoft's GAYDAR mark, which was distinctive at the time the Infringing Domain Names were registered. 76. Defendants adopted the Infringing Domain Names with a bad faith

intent to profit from QSoft's GAYDAR mark. 77. Defendants provided false contact information when applying for the

registration of the Infringing Domain Names in an effort to further conceal their true identity in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(3). 78. Defendants' use of the Infringing Domain Names has caused, and will

continue to cause, irreparable harm to QSoft's goodwill and reputation. 79. 80. Defendants' actions were willful. QSoft has no adequate remedy at law. QSoft therefore seeks an order

from the Court transferring the Infringing Domain Names to QSoft. 81. Defendants' activities, as alleged herein, constitute a violation of the

federal Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). 82. QSoft has incurred attorneys' fees and costs as a result of Defendants'

willful and intentional actions. 83. QSoft has been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial as a result of

Defendants' willful and intentional actions.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

14

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 15 of 30

COUNT III Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. § 1030 et seq.) 84. QSoft realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 63

as if fully set forth herein. 85. QSoft maintains one or more computers as defined by 18 U.S.C. §

1030(e) through which e-mail transmissions are received, stored and disseminated for the benefit of Gaydar Members. 86. Defendant Tong, without authorization, caused the transmission of one

or more programs, information, codes, or commands to QSoft's computer facilities through the means of a computer used in interstate commerce,, knowingly and willfully, with the intent, or alternatively with reckless disregard of a substantial and unjustified risk, that its transmission would damage or cause damage to QSoft's computer system or network. 87. Tong knowingly and intentionally accessed QSoft's computer system

and network by obtaining multiple accounts. 88. Tong knowingly transmitted unsolicited commercial messages to Gaydar

Members that included, in place of the actual sender's return address, the addresses of two accounts that Defendant Teddy Tong created with the intention of collecting never-to-be-read complaints. 89. Tong transmitted unsolicited commercial messages to Gaydar Members

knowing that numerous messages and complaints would be collected by his fraudulently obtained accounts.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 16 of 30

90.

Tong transmitted unsolicited commercial messages to Gaydar Members

knowing that numerous recipients of the messages would e-mail complaints to QSoft. 91. Tong transmitted unsolicited commercial messages to Gaydar Members

knowing that his conduct could potentially damage QSoft's computer system and online services, including the risk that QSoft would be forced to withhold or delay the use of computer services to its legitimate subscribers. 92. Defendant Tong's willful transmission of one or more programs,

information, codes, or commands to QSoft's computer system or network did in fact cause damage to QSoft's computer system and network. 93. By the actions alleged above, Tong intentionally accessed QSoft's

protected computer network or system without authorization, or in excess of authorization, and obtained information from a protected computer via an interstate or foreign communication in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2)(C). 94. By the actions alleged above, Tong, knowingly and with intent to

defraud, accessed QSoft's protected computer system or network without authorization and/or in excess of authorized access in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(4). 95. By the actions alleged above, Tong knowingly and intentionally

accessed QSoft's protected computer system and network and knowingly caused the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, without authorization and/or in excess of authorized access in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5). 96. economic loss. Defendant Tong's actions caused QSoft to suffer in excess of $5,000 in

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

16

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 17 of 30

97.

QSoft has suffered immediate and ongoing irreparable harm and has no

adequate remedy at law. COUNT IV Violation of the Lanham Act (Section 43(c), 15 U.S.C. § 1125) 98. QSoft realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 63

as if fully set forth herein. 99. 100. QSoft is the owner of the GAYDAR common law name and mark. QSoft, using its GAYDAR mark, has been overwhelmingly successful.

QSoft's GAYDAR websites are some of the most visited gay and lesbian oriented websites in the world. QSoft's network of websites serve more than 300 million page impressions per month to over three million registered and audited users. As such, the GAYDAR name and mark is incredibly valuable and famous. 101. By the actions alleged above, Defendants have made commercial use in

commerce of the GAYDAR name and mark with the willful intent to trade on QSoft's reputation and to cause dilution of the famous GAYDAR mark. 102. Defendants' use of the GAYDAR mark began in November 2006, long

after QSoft's GAYDAR mark had become well-known and famous. 103. Defendants' use of the GAYDAR mark has caused, and continues to

cause, dilution of its distinctive quality and lessens its capacity to identify and distinguish QSoft's goods, services, and customers. Additionally, Defendants' intentional

association of the GAYDAR mark with its unsolicited commercial messages tarnishes and diminishes the value of the GAYDAR famous mark.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

17

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 18 of 30

104.

Defendants' activities described herein constitute trademark dilution

within the meaning of Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c). 105. On November 24, 2006, QSoft advised Defendants in writing of QSoft's

ownership of the GAYDAR mark and demanded that Defendants immediately cease and desist from further use of the GAYDAR mark and its activities related thereto. See Exhibit E. Defendants failed to comply with QSoft's request. 106. On May 30, 2007, QSoft again demanded in writing that Defendants See Exhibit E.

cease and desist their infringing and otherwise harmful activities. Defendants have not complied with QSoft's requests. 107.

Defendants' acts have damaged, impaired, and diluted that part of

QSoft's goodwill symbolized by its GAYDAR mark to QSoft's immediate and irreparable damage. This is especially true insofar as Defendants' acts induce those viewing or receiving Defendant Tong's unsolicited commercial messages and advertisements to conclude incorrectly that QSoft was somehow connected with, condoned, or participated in Defendants' commercial endeavors. 108. As a result of Defendants' activities, QSoft has suffered, and continues

to suffer, irreparable injury, loss of reputation, and pecuniary damages, and, therefore, is entitled to three times its actual damages as well as disgorgement of any if Defendants' profits, in addition to attorneys' fees and costs, in amounts to be proven at trial. 109. Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendants will continue these acts,

thereby causing QSoft further immediate and irreparable harm.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

18

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 19 of 30

110.

The above-mentioned acts were done in an intentional, willful,

malicious, and oppressive manner in conscious disregard of QSoft's rights. Accordingly, QSoft is entitled to treble damages under the Lanham Act. COUNT V Violation of the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (Del. Code tit. 6, § 2531 et seq.) 111. QSoft realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 63

as if fully set forth herein. 112. 113. QSoft is the owner of the GAYDAR common law name and mark. QSoft has been overwhelmingly successful. Since their inception,

QSoft's GAYDAR websites have become some of the most visited gay and lesbian websites in the world. QSoft's network of websites serve more than 300 million page impressions per month to over three million registered and audited users. As such, the GAYDAR name and mark is incredibly valuable and famous. 114. Upon information and belief, Defendants are engaged in a business,

vocation, or occupation involving the manipulation of Internet traffic, as well as the provision, maintenance, or management of substantive content on the Internet. 115. Defendants have sent hundreds of unsolicited commercial messages to

QSoft's customers that contained links to websites. These websites contained QSoft's famous mark, GAYDAR. 116. Defendants' infringing use of QSoft's GAYDAR mark in the unsolicited

commercial messages sent to QSoft customers was done in the course of Defendants' business, vocation, or occupation.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

19

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 20 of 30

117.

Defendants' infringing use of QSoft's GAYDAR mark in the unsolicited

commercial messages sent to QSoft customers causes a likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of the spam messages and of the infringing websites in violation of Section 2532(a)(2) of the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. 118. Defendants' infringing use of QSoft's GAYDAR mark in the unsolicited

commercial messages sent to QSoft customers causes a likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to the spam messages' or infringing websites' affiliation, connection, or association with, or certification by, QSoft in violation of Section 2532(a)(3) of the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. 119. Through their infringing use of QSoft's GAYDAR mark in the

unsolicited commercial messages sent to QSoft customers, Defendants have misrepresented that their spam messages or infringing websites have the sponsorship or approval of QSoft in violation of Section 2532(a)(5) of the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Additionally, through their infringing use of QSoft's GAYDAR mark in the unsolicited commercial messages sent to QSoft customers, Defendants have misrepresented that they are sponsored by QSoft, that QSoft approves of their conduct, or that their goods or services are connected to QSoft, all in violation of Section 2532(a)(5) of the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. 120. Defendants have engaged in other conduct which similarly creates a

likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding in violation of Section 2532(a)(12) of the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act by using fraudulently obtained Gaydar Member accounts to transmit the unsolicited commercial messages to QSoft customers.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

20

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 21 of 30

By using a Gaydar Member account to initiate the spam messages, Defendants greatly increased the likelihood that a recipient would be confused or misled as to the origin, sponsorship, or affiliation of the spam messages or the infringing websites. 121. By the above-stated conduct, Defendants have committed actionable

violations of the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Del. Code Tit. 6, § 2531 et seq. 122. QSoft has suffered actual damages to be proven at trial as a result of

Defendants' aforementioned conduct. 123. The above-mentioned acts were done in an intentional, willful,

malicious, and oppressive manner in conscious disregard of QSoft's rights. Accordingly, QSoft is entitled to treble damages and attorneys fees under the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. COUNT VI Common Law Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition 124. QSoft realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 63

as if fully set forth herein. 125. Defendants' use of the Infringing Domain Names to promote directly

competitive online gay and lesbian oriented dating and chat room services has caused actual confusion or is likely to cause confusion with QSoft's GAYDAR mark. See Exhibit G. 126. Defendants' conduct constitutes unfair competition by using the

Infringing Domain Names for the promotion of directly competitive online gay and lesbian oriented dating and chat room services creates the false and misleading

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

21

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 22 of 30

impression that the advertised gay and lesbian oriented dating and chat room services are authorized or sponsored by, or are associated with, QSoft. 127. Defendants' promotion of directly competitive online gay and lesbian

oriented dating and chat room services are based on false and fraudulent claims and is designed to influence consumer purchasing decisions. Attached as Exhibit I is an

unsolicited commercial message from one of Defendant Tong's fraudulently obtained accounts. 128. By reason of the foregoing activities, Defendants have violated and

infringed QSoft's common law rights in its GAYDAR mark, and have otherwise competed unfairly with QSoft in violation of the common law of the State of Delaware and Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). 129. Upon information and belief, all of Defendants' aforementioned acts

were and are intentional and willful. 130. Defendants' aforementioned acts have damaged QSoft and, unless

enjoined, will continue to damage and cause irreparable injury to QSoft's goodwill and reputation. 131. QSoft has no adequate remedy at law. COUNT VII Breach of Contract 132. QSoft realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 63

as if fully set forth herein. 133. In order to obtain a account, Defendant Tong was This

specifically required, and expressly accepted, QSoft's Terms and Conditions.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

22

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 23 of 30

contract expressly prohibited any use of the GAYDAR websites to spam or send unsolicited commercial messages. See Exhibit C Provision 6.1.2. 134. QSoft's Terms and Conditions also expressly prohibits the use of

QSoft's services for any commercial endeavors and prohibits users from having more than one Member Account at one time. See Exhibit C, Provision 6.1.2 and 6.1.11. 135. accounts. 136. Defendant Tong's use of multiple, fraudulently obtained Defendant Tong fraudulently obtained multiple

accounts to send hundreds of unsolicited commercial messages to Gaydar Members in order to carry out his illegal scheme constitutes a breach of his contract with QSoft. 137. activities. 138. As a result of Defendant Tong's breaches of contract, QSoft is entitled to QSoft has been damaged as a result of Defendant Tong's breaching

actual and consequential damages in an amount to be proven at trial. COUNT VIII Trespass to Chattel 139. QSoft realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 63

as if fully set forth herein. 140. Defendants intentionally employed automated robots, scripts, or

executable commands to send multiple unsolicited commercial messages to QSoft's customers in direct violation of QSoft's Terms and Conditions and in direct contravention of QSoft's cease and desist letters.

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

23

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 24 of 30

141.

Defendants were never authorized to use QSoft's computer systems to

send unsolicited commercial messages to QSoft customers. 142. capacity. 143. Defendants' automated transmission of hundreds of unsolicited QSoft's computer systems are valuable resources and have a finite

commercial messages to QSoft customers through the use of QSoft's computer systems consumed a significant capacity of QSoft's computer systems. 144. Defendants' unauthorized consumption of QSoft's computer systems' usage by QSoft customers,

capacity depleted the capacity available for authorized

thereby diminishing the condition, quality, and/or value of QSoft's computer systems. 145. In addition, Defendants' unauthorized use of automated robots, scripts,

or executable commands endangers QSoft's computer systems by creating a threat of congestion and overload problems, both of which would significantly disrupt QSoft's operations. 146. As a result of Defendants' trespass to chattel, QSoft is entitled to actual

and consequential damages in an amount to be proven at trial. RELIEF REQUESTED WHEREFORE, Plaintiff QSoft Consulting Limited, prays for judgment against Defendants Teddy Tong and tdtong ltd on each and every count listed in the Complaint and for relief including: A) An order temporarily or permanently enjoining Defendants from: (i) directly or indirectly sending or transmitting any unsolicited commercial messages to any Internet or QSoft user including, but not limited to, any such message that references in any way

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 25 of 30

GAYDAR or any of the GAYDAR websites for a commercial purpose; (ii) (iii) using any automated scripts, bots, or other executable programs in connection with any QSoft and/or GAYDAR account or service; using, linking, selling, exercising control over, or otherwise owning the Infringing Domain Names , , , or any other domain name or trademark or service mark that incorporates, in whole or in part, QSoft's GAYDAR mark; using false representations or descriptions in commerce or using false designations of origin that are likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of Defendants with QSoft and/or GAYDAR or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of Defendants' services by QSoft and/or GAYDAR; infringing and otherwise violating the common law trademark rights of QSoft in the GAYDAR mark; unfairly competing with QSoft and/or GAYDAR or otherwise injuring QSoft's business reputation in any manner; establishing any accounts with any GAYDAR websites;

(iv)

(v) (vi) (vii)

(viii) using QSoft's computer network or system in connection with sending unsolicited commercial messages; (ix) (x) continuing to violate QSoft's Terms and Conditions; assisting, aiding, or abetting any other person or business entity in engaging in or performing any of the activities referred to in subparagraphs (i) through (ix) above;

B)

An order transferring the Infringing Domain Names, , and to QSoft;

C)

An order directing Defendants to deliver up for destruction all printed and electronically stored materials in Defendants' control bearing all or part of the GAYDAR mark;

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

25

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 26 of 30

D)

An order requiring Defendants to pay QSoft damages in an amount sufficient to compensate it fairly for the injury it sustained, plus all profits that are attributable to Defendants' use of the Infringing Domain Names and QSoft's GAYDAR mark in the promotion, advertising, and sale of QSoft's goods and services, and further that the amount of monetary award be trebled in view of the willful and deliberate nature of Defendants' unlawful conduct under the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Del. Code tit. 6, § 2531 et seq., including but not limited to any and all fees, costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees incurred in this action and any and all statutory damages;

E)

An order requiring Defendants to pay QSoft an amount of money for QSoft to effectively engage in a corrective advertising campaign to undo the damage to its business and reputation caused by Defendants;

F)

An order requiring Defendants to pay QSoft statutory damages for each violation of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d);

G)

Actual damages in an amount to be proven at trial or statutory damages under the CAN-SPAM Act;

H) I)

An order requiring Defendants to pay QSoft its attorneys' fees and costs; An order awarding such other and further relief as this Court may deem equitable and proper;

DEL 86184759v3 6/19/2007

26

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 27 of 30

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 28 of 30

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 29 of 30

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 30 of 30

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 1 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 2 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 3 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 4 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 5 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 6 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 7 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 8 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 9 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 10 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 11 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 12 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 13 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 14 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-2

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 15 of 15

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-3

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-3

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-3

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-3

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 4 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-4

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-4

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-4

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-4

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 4 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 1 of 24

EXHIBIT E

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 2 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 3 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 4 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 5 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 6 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 7 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 8 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 9 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 10 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 11 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 12 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 13 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 14 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 15 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 16 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 17 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 18 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 19 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 20 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 21 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 22 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 23 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-5

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 24 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-6

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 1 of 1

SEALED DOCUMENT

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-7

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 1 of 1

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JJF

Document 1-8

Filed 06/19/2007

Page 1 of 1