Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS
Document 168
Filed 04/25/2008
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ______________________________________ IN RE: REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP PATENT LITIGATION ______________________________________ MOTOROLA, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP, and REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC d/b/a/ REMSTREAM, Defendants. ______________________________________ ) ) ) MDL Docket No. 07-md-1848 (GMS) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 07-752-GMS ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER AMENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the plaintiffs in Case No. 07-752-GMS filed a Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (D.I. 147) (the "Motion") on April 11, 2008; the Motion seeks leave to file a First Amended Complaint that would include antitrust and unfair competition allegations; WHEREAS, Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Rembrandt") and Rembrandt Technologies, LLC ("Remstream") oppose the Motion, and because Rembrandt and Remstream consider the motion and opposition complex and expect that it will take significant time and effort to prepare a response, Rembrandt and Remstream seek an extension of time within which to file their Answering Brief to the Motion; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties to this stipulation, subject to the Order of the Court, that the date by which the Answering Brief of Rembrandt and Remstream to the Motion shall be extended to and through May 5, 2008.
Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS
Document 168
Filed 04/25/2008
Page 2 of 2
_/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.__________________ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. (#2237) Francis DiGiovanni (#3189) James D. Heisman (#2746) Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP 1007 N. Orange Street Wilmington, Delaware 19899 (302) 658-9141 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Rembrandt Technologies, LP
_/s/ John W. Shaw_________________ John W. Shaw (#3362) Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP The Brandywine Building, 17th Floor 1000 West Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 571-6000 [email protected] Liaison Counsel for Equipment Manufacturer Defendants
IT IS SO ORDERED, this ____ of April, 2008.
____________________________________ Chief, United States District Judge
-2-