Free Notice (Other) - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 532.3 kB
Pages: 191
Date: September 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 10,084 Words, 65,562 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38499/283.pdf

Download Notice (Other) - District Court of Delaware ( 532.3 kB)


Preview Notice (Other) - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) MDL Docket No. 07-md-1848 (GMS) ) ) ) )

In re: REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP PATENT LITIGATION

NOTICE OF SERVICE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that true and correct copies of following Notices of Depositions were served upon the attorneys of record on August 1, 2008 by e-mail: · Adelphia Communications Corporation, Century-TCI California Communications, LP, Century-TCI Holdings, LLC, Comcast of Florida/Pennsylvania, L.P. (f/k/a Parnassos, LP), Comcast of Pennsylvania II, L.P. (f/k/a Century-TCI California, L.P.),Parnassos Communications, LP, Adelphia Consolidation, LLC, Parnassos Holdings, LLC, and Western NY Cablevision Ambit Microsystems, Inc. ARRIS Group, Inc. CSC Holdings, Inc. and Cablevision Systems Corporation Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications Operating, LLC Cisco Systems, Inc. Comcast Corporation and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC Coxcom, Inc., Cox Communications, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc. Motorola, Inc. NETGEAR, Inc. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Thomson, Inc. Time Warner Cable, Inc., Time Warner Cable LLC, Time Warner New York Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company, LP, and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership

· · · · · · · · · · · ·

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 2 of 5

Dated: August 1, 2008

/s/ Francis DiGiovanni. Collins J. Seitz, Jr. (#2237) Francis DiGiovanni (#3189) James D. Heisman (#2746) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP The Nemours Building 1007 N. Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19899 Phone (302) 658-9141 [email protected] Attorneys for Rembrandt Technologies, LP, and Rembrandt Technologies, LLC d/b/a Remstream

2

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 3 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Francis DiGiovanni, hereby certify that on the 1st day of August, 2008, a true copy of the foregoing was hand delivered to the following persons and was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to the following and the document is available for viewing and downloading from CM/ECF: BY E-MAIL Jack B. Blumenfeld Karen Jacobs Louden Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP 1201 North Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899 [email protected] [email protected] Rodger D. Smith II (#3778) 1201 N. Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 (302) 658-9200 [email protected] John W. Shaw Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street, 17th Floor P.O. Box 391 Wilmington, DE 19899-0391 [email protected]

Richard D. Kirk Scott G. Wilcox Stephen B. Brauerman Bayard, PA 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 P.O. Box 25130 Wilmington, DE 19899 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

3

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 4 of 5

Fredrick L. Cottrell, III Kelly E. Farnan Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. One Rodney Square 920 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 [email protected] [email protected]

Peter J. Toren Lawrence B. Goodwin Monica V. Bhattacharyya Stefan R. Stoyanov Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP 1633 Broadway New York, NY 10019 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] David Segal Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3161 Michelson Drive Irvina, California 92612-4412 [email protected]

Josh A. Krevitt Charles J. Bourdreau Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 200 Park Avenue, 47th Floor New York, New York 10166-0193 [email protected] [email protected] Amanda J. Tessar Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1801 California Street, Suite 4200 Denver, CO 80202-2642 [email protected]

David S. Benyacar Daniel L. Reisner Kaye Scholer LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 [email protected] [email protected]

4

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 5 of 5

Matthew D. Powers Edward R. Reines Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 [email protected] [email protected]

Robert A. Van Nest Brian L. Ferrall Daralyn J. Durie Leo L. Lam Matthew M. Werdegar KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Eric R. Lamison Kirkland & Ellis LLP 555 California Street, Ste. 2700 San Francisco, CA 94104 [email protected]

John Desmarais Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022 [email protected] Mitchell Stockwell Kilpatrick & Stockton LLP 110 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309 [email protected]

Bradford P. Lyerla Kevin D. Hogg Charles E. Juister Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6357 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

By: /s/ Francis DiGiovanni. (#3189) Francis DiGiovannie (#3189) [email protected]

5

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 1 of 15

EXHIBIT A

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 2 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE _________________________________________ ) ) In re: REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP ) PATENT LITIGATION ) ) ) _________________________________________ )

MDL Docket No. 07-md-1848 (GMS) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF'S PARTIAL NOTICE OF VIDEOTAPED ORAL DEPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO RULE 30(B)(6) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Plaintiff" or "Rembrandt") will take the deposition of Adelphia Communications Corporation, Century-TCI California Communications, LP, Century-TCI Holdings, LLC, Comcast of Florida/Pennsylvania, L.P. (f/k/a Parnassos, LP), Comcast of Pennsylvania II, L.P. (f/k/a Century-TCI California, L.P.), Parnassos Communications, LP, Adelphia Consolidation, LLC, Parnassos Holdings, LLC, and Western NY Cablevision (collectively, "you" or "Adelphia") beginning at 9:00 a.m., in the offices of KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C., 1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400, Washington, D.C. 20036 on August 18, 2008, or at such time and place agreed to by counsel for the parties. The deposition will be taken pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 30 of the Court's Local Rules before an officer and reporter authorized to administer oaths. The deposition will be videotaped and recorded by stenographic means. As required by Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, you shall designate one or more officers, directors, managing agents, employees, or other sufficiently knowledgeable persons who consents to testify on your behalf with respect to each of the matters set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, and the person(s) so designated shall be required to testify as to each

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 3 of 15

of those matters known or reasonably available to you. Please provide notice of the identity of the witness(es) designated by you to counsel for Rembrandt no later than ten (10) business days prior to the date on which the deposition shall commence. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 30(b)(2) and Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, you are required to produce the documents listed in Exhibit B at or before the noticed deposition herein. You are further required to produce prior to the deposition any and all information or material previously requested in discovery, but not yet produced. Rembrandt reserves the right to amend or supplement this notice and these exhibits as more information becomes available to Rembrandt during the course of discovery.

Dated: August 1, 2008

Respectfully Submitted,

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C.

Collins J. Seitz, Jr. (#2237) Francis DiGiovanni (#3189) James D. Heisman (#2746) Kristen Healey Cramer (#4512) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP 1007 N. Orange Street P.O. Box 2207 Wilmington, Delaware 19899 (302) 658-9141 Max L. Tribble, Jr. SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77002-5096 (713) 651-9366

By: _/s/ Rebecca A. Beynon___________ Mark C. Hansen J.C. Rozendaal Aaron M. Panner Rebecca A. Beynon KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C. 1615 M. Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 326-7900 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

2

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 4 of 15

Brooke A.M. Taylor Edgar Sargent Matthew R. Berry SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington 98101-3000 (206) 516-3880

Attorneys for Rembrandt

3

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 5 of 15

EXHIBIT A DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply to this Notice of Deposition and are deemed to be incorporated into each subject listed below: 1. The phrase "relating to" means discussing, describing, referring to, pertaining to,

containing, analyzing, studying, reporting on, commenting on, evidencing, constituting, setting forth, considering, recommending, concerning, or pertaining to, in whole or in part. 2. The term "document" or "documents" is used in the broadest sense permitted by

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and means the original (or any copy when originals are not available) and any drafts or non-identical copies thereof, whether different from the original because of interlineation, receipt stamp, notation of copy sent or received or otherwise, of any book, pamphlet, periodical, letter, report, note, memorandum, record, minutes, calendar or diary entry, transcript, study, compilation, patent, patent application, analysis, tabulation, map, diagram, drawing, plan, picture, summary, working paper, chart, paper, graph index, data sheet, data processing card, computer printout, summary of a computer printout, tape, contract, agreement, lease, ledger, journal, balance sheet, account, invoice, purchase order, receipt, billing record, financial data, financial statement, file, diary, film, trip tickets, telex, teletype or other messages, telegram, expense vouchers, instructions, bulletins or any other writing or recording of information, however produced, recorded, maintained or reproduced, including any electronic or mechanical recording of any oral material, within the possession, custody or control of defendant or any of its officers, directors, employees, attorneys, or other agents and/or representatives. 3. The term "including" shall mean including but not limited to.

4

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 6 of 15

4.

The term "person" means natural person, corporation, firm, company, sole

proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, association, institute, or other business, legal or governmental entity or association, including any directors, officers, employees, agents or representatives thereof. 5. The term "communication" (or any variant thereof) means any contact between or

among two or more Persons and shall include, without limitation, written contact by means such as letters, memoranda, telegrams, telecopies, telexes, e-mail, or any other document; the transmittal of information by any means; any oral contact such as face-to-face meetings or telephone conversations; and any writings memorializing such oral contact. 6. "Thing" means any tangible object other than a Document including, without

limitation, objects of every kind and nature, as well as prototypes, models, drafts, or specimens thereof. 7. As used herein, "the Defendant(s)" means the following entities and their

subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, successors or assignees, and their respective officers, directors, employees, and agents: Time Warner Cable, Inc., Time Warner Cable LLC, Time Warner New York Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company, LP, Time Warner Entertainment­ Advance/Newhouse Partnership, Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc., Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc., CSC Holdings, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Adelphia Communications Corporation, Century-TCI California, LP, Century-TCI California Communications, LP, Century-TCI Holdings, LLC, Parnassos, LP, Parnassos Communications, LP, Adelphia Consolidation, LLC, Parnassos Holdings, LLC, Western NY Cablevision, LP, Motorola, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., ARRIS Group,

5

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 7 of 15

Inc., Thomson, Inc., Ambit Microsystems, Inc., and NETGEAR, Inc. In the case of Comcast Corporation, this definition includes, without limitation, Sedna. 8. As used herein, "Adelphia," "you," or "your" means Adelphia Communications

Corporation, Century-TCI California Communications, LP, Century-TCI Holdings, LLC, Comcast of Florida/Pennsylvania, L.P. (f/k/a Parnassos, LP), Comcast of Pennsylvania II, L.P. (f/k/a Century-TCI California, L.P.), Parnassos Communications, LP, Adelphia Consolidation, LLC, Parnassos Holdings, LLC, Western NY Cablevision and their agents, subsidiaries, related entities, affiliated companies, predecessors, successors, assigns, officers, directors, partners, employees, representatives (in their individual or representative capacities), affiliates of any kind or nature, or any person or entity acting on their behalf. 9. As used herein, "Rembrandt" shall mean Rembrandt Technologies, LP including

without limitation all of its corporate locations, and all predecessors, and affiliates, and all past or present directors, officers, agents, representatives, employees, consultants, and attorneys. 10. The terms "and" and "or" shall be construed disjunctively or conjunctively as

necessary to bring within the scope of these requests all documents which might otherwise be construed to be outside their scope. 11. The term "all" shall mean any and all, and the term "any" shall mean any and all,

unless the context clearly requires otherwise. 12. References to the singular shall include the plural, and references to the plural

shall include the singular as may be appropriate or construe the individual topics for examination in the broadest form.

6

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 8 of 15

13.

The masculine form of a noun or pronoun shall be considered to include within its

meaning the feminine form of the noun or pronoun, and vice versa as may be appropriate to make the individual topics for examination inclusive rather than exclusive. 14. Any reference to any individual person, either singularly or as a part of a defined

group, includes that individual person's employees, agents, successors, assignees, heirs, and representatives. 15. The term "Patents-in-Suit" shall mean United States patents numbers: 6,131,159;

5,710,761; 5,778,234; 6,950,444; 5,008,903; 4,937,819; 5,719,858; and 5,852,631. 16. As used herein, the term "CableLabs" shall mean Cable Television Laboratories,

Inc. and its agents, subsidiaries, related entities, affiliated companies, predecessors, successors, assigns, officers, directors, partners, employees, representatives (in their individual or representative capacities), affiliates of any kind or nature, or any person or entity acting on their behalf. 17. The term "cable industry" shall mean entities, including but not limited to the

MSO Defendants, that provide "cable services" within the meaning of 47 U.S.C. § 522(6) or that provide to such entities information, products, or services related to the provision of cable services within the meaning of 47 U.S.C. § 522(6). 18. The term "Accused Products and Services" shall include all of Defendants'

services or products that involve in any way a cable modem or the use of a cable modem, including but not limited to providing high speed cable internet services and VoIP services. 19. The term "DOCSIS" shall refer to the commonly known industry specifications

referred to as DOCSIS 1.0, DOCSIS 1.1, DOCSIS 2.0, and DOCSIS 3.0.

7

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 9 of 15

20.

"DOCSIS-Compliant Devices" include cable modems or cable modem

termination systems that comply with any of the DOCSIS 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, or 3.0 specifications, manufactured, sold, leased, offered for sale or used by the Defendants. 21. As used herein, "Rembrandt multi-district litigation" means the litigation styled In

re Rembrandt Technologies, LP Patent Litig., MDL Docket No. 07-md-1848 (D. Del.), and the cases of which the multi-district litigation is comprised, including: Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Cablevision Systems Corp. et al., Civil Action No. 1:06-635 (D. Del.); Coxcom, Inc. v. Rembrandt Technologies, LP, C.A. No. 1:06-721 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. CBS Corp., C.A. No. 1:06-727 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. NBC Universal, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-730 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. ABC, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-730 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:06-731 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Adelphia Communications Corp., et al., Bky. Advy. No. 1:06-1739 (Bankr. SDNY); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Adelphia Communications Corp., C.A. No. 1:07-214 (SDNY); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Comcast Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:05-443 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Sharp Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-47 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 2:06223 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., C.A. No. 2:06-224 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., C.A. No. 2:06-369 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Comcast Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-506 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-507 (E.D. Tex.). 22. "Related Action" means each case of which the multi-district litigation is

comprised (see ¶ 15 above), as well as Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Harris Corp., C.A. No.

8

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 10 of 15

07C-09-059-JRS (Del. Super. Ct.) and Motorola, Inc., et al. v. Rembrandt Technologies, LP, C.A. No. 07-752 (D. Del.).

TOPICS FOR EXAMINATION 1. 2. 3. When and how Adelphia first became aware of each of the Patents-in-Suit. Who within Adelphia first became aware of each of the Patents-in-Suit. What investigation, if any, Adelphia conducted after becoming aware of any of

the Patents-in-Suit to determine whether said patent(s) was valid, infringed, enforceable, or licensed. 4. Any analysis, opinion, or inquiry regarding potential infringement of the claims in

each of the Patents-in-Suit, including, but not limited to any pre-litigation and postcommencement-of-litigation investigations performed by or on behalf of you, your partners, your licensors, your customers, your resellers, and/or your affiliates, related to the potential infringement by any products or systems made, used, offered for sale, and/or sold by you, your partners, your licensors, your customers, you resellers, and/or your affiliates. 5. 6. Efforts by Adelphia to design any products around the Patents-in-Suit. Adelphia's policies and/or customs, whether in writing or oral, on investigating or

refraining from investigating whether Adelphia's products and/or services, whether existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties. 7. Adelphia's communications, whether internal or external, regarding whether to

investigate if the Accused Products and Services infringed any patents owned by a third party. 8. Adelphia's communications, whether internal or external, regarding each of the

Patents-in-Suit after Adelphia became aware of them.

9

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 11 of 15

9.

Adelphia's investigations into whether Adelphia's products and/or services,

whether existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties. 10. The role of Sedna Services LLC in investigating whether Adelphia's products

and/or services, whether existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties. 11. Adelphia's understanding of the custom or practice in its industry to investigate

whether products and/or services, whether existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties.

10

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 12 of 15

EXHIBIT B 1. All documents and things considered, reviewed, or prepared by Adelphia in the

course of preparing for the 30(b)(6) deposition on the subjects listed above in Exhibit A.

11

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 13 of 15

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Rebecca A. Beynon, hereby certify that on the first day of August, 2008, a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Videotaped Oral Deposition to Adelphia Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) to be served upon the following in the manner indicated: BY E-MAIL

Jack B. Blumenfield Karen Jacobs Louden Rodger D. Smith II Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP 1201 North Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

John W. Shaw Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street, 17th Floor P.O. Box 391 Wilmington, DE 19899-0391 [email protected]

Richard K. Hermann Mary B. Matterer Amy Arnott Quinlan Morris James LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801-1494 [email protected]

Richard D. Kirk Scott G. Wilcox Stephen B. Brauerman Bayard, PA 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 P.O. Box 25130 Wilmington, DE 19899 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Fredrick L. Cottrell, III Kelly E. Farnan Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. One Rodney Square 920 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 [email protected] [email protected]

Peter J. Toren Lawrence B. Goodwin Monica V. Bhattacharyya Stefan R. Stoyanov Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP 1633 Broadway New York, NY 10019 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

12

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 14 of 15

Josh A. Drevitt Charles J. Bourdreau Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 200 Park Avenue, 47th Floor New York, New York 10166-0193 [email protected] [email protected]

David Segal Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3161 Michelson Drive Irvina, California 92612-4412 [email protected]

Amanda J. Tessar Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1801 California Street, Suite 4200 Denver, CO 80202-2642 [email protected]

David S. Benyacar Daniel L. Reisner Kaye Scholer LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 [email protected] [email protected]

Matthew D. Powers Edward R. Reines Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 [email protected] [email protected]

John Desmarais Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022 [email protected]

Robert A. Van Nest Brian L. Ferrall Daralyn J. Durie Leo L. Lam Matthew M. Werdegar Keker & Van Nest LLP 710 Sansome Street San Franscisco, CA 94111 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Mitchell Stockwell Kilpatrick & Stockton LLP 110 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309 [email protected]

Eric R. Lamison Kirkland & Ellis LLP 555 California Street, Ste. 2700 San Francisco, CA 94104 [email protected]

Richard Brown Day Pitney LLP 200 Campus Drive Florham Park, NJ 07932 [email protected]

13

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 15 of 15

Bradford P. Lyerla Kevin D. Hogg Charles E. Juister Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6357 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Gerald Levy Day Pitney LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 [email protected]

Jonathan Tropp Day Pitney LLP One Canterbury Green 201 Broad Street Stamford, CT 06901 [email protected]

By: _/s/ Rebecca A. Beynon______ Rebecca A. Beynon [email protected]

14

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 1 of 13

EXHIBIT B

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 2 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE _________________________________________ ) ) In re: REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP ) PATENT LITIGATION ) ) ) _________________________________________ )

MDL Docket No. 07-md-1848 (GMS) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF'S PARTIAL NOTICE OF VIDEOTAPED ORAL DEPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO RULE 30(B)(6) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Plaintiff" or "Rembrandt") will take the deposition of Ambit Microsystems, Inc. ("you" or "Ambit") beginning at 9:00 a.m., in the offices of KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C., 1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400, Washington, D.C. 20036 on August 18, 2008, or at such time and place agreed to by counsel for the parties. The deposition will be taken pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 30 of the Court's Local Rules before an officer and reporter authorized to administer oaths. The deposition will be videotaped and recorded by stenographic means. As required by Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, you shall designate one or more officers, directors, managing agents, employees, or other sufficiently knowledgeable persons who consents to testify on your behalf with respect to each of the matters set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, and the person(s) so designated shall be required to testify as to each of those matters known or reasonably available to you. Please provide notice of the identity of the witness(es) designated by you to counsel for Rembrandt no later than ten (10) business days prior to the date on which the deposition shall commence.

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 3 of 13

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 30(b)(2) and Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, you are required to produce the documents listed in Exhibit B at or before the noticed deposition herein. You are further required to produce prior to the deposition any and all information or material previously requested in discovery, but not yet produced. Rembrandt reserves the right to amend or supplement this notice and these exhibits as more information becomes available to Rembrandt during the course of discovery.

Dated: August 1, 2008

Respectfully Submitted,

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C.

Collins J. Seitz, Jr. (#2237) Francis DiGiovanni (#3189) James D. Heisman (#2746) Kristen Healey Cramer (#4512) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP 1007 N. Orange Street P.O. Box 2207 Wilmington, Delaware 19899 (302) 658-9141 Max L. Tribble, Jr. SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77002-5096 (713) 651-9366 Brooke A.M. Taylor Edgar Sargent Matthew R. Berry SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington 98101-3000 (206) 516-3880

By: _/s/ Rebecca A. Beynon___________ Mark C. Hansen J.C. Rozendaal Aaron M. Panner Rebecca A. Beynon KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C. 1615 M. Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 326-7900 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Attorneys for Rembrandt

2

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 4 of 13

EXHIBIT A DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply to this Notice of Deposition and are deemed to be incorporated into each subject listed below: 1. The phrase "relating to" means discussing, describing, referring to, pertaining to,

containing, analyzing, studying, reporting on, commenting on, evidencing, constituting, setting forth, considering, recommending, concerning, or pertaining to, in whole or in part. 2. The term "document" or "documents" is used in the broadest sense permitted by

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and means the original (or any copy when originals are not available) and any drafts or non-identical copies thereof, whether different from the original because of interlineation, receipt stamp, notation of copy sent or received or otherwise, of any book, pamphlet, periodical, letter, report, note, memorandum, record, minutes, calendar or diary entry, transcript, study, compilation, patent, patent application, analysis, tabulation, map, diagram, drawing, plan, picture, summary, working paper, chart, paper, graph index, data sheet, data processing card, computer printout, summary of a computer printout, tape, contract, agreement, lease, ledger, journal, balance sheet, account, invoice, purchase order, receipt, billing record, financial data, financial statement, file, diary, film, trip tickets, telex, teletype or other messages, telegram, expense vouchers, instructions, bulletins or any other writing or recording of information, however produced, recorded, maintained or reproduced, including any electronic or mechanical recording of any oral material, within the possession, custody or control of defendant or any of its officers, directors, employees, attorneys, or other agents and/or representatives. 3. The term "including" shall mean including but not limited to.

3

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 5 of 13

4.

The term "person" means natural person, corporation, firm, company, sole

proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, association, institute, or other business, legal or governmental entity or association, including any directors, officers, employees, agents or representatives thereof. 5. The term "communication" (or any variant thereof) means any contact between or

among two or more Persons and shall include, without limitation, written contact by means such as letters, memoranda, telegrams, telecopies, telexes, e-mail, or any other document; the transmittal of information by any means; any oral contact such as face-to-face meetings or telephone conversations; and any writings memorializing such oral contact. 6. "Thing" means any tangible object other than a Document including, without

limitation, objects of every kind and nature, as well as prototypes, models, drafts, or specimens thereof. 7. As used herein, "the Defendant(s)" means the following entities and their

subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, successors or assignees, and their respective officers, directors, employees, and agents: Time Warner Cable, Inc., Time Warner Cable LLC, Time Warner New York Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company, LP, Time Warner Entertainment­ Advance/Newhouse Partnership, Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc., Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc., CSC Holdings, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Adelphia Communications Corporation, Century-TCI California, LP, Century-TCI California Communications, LP, Century-TCI Holdings, LLC, Parnassos, LP, Parnassos Communications, LP, Adelphia Consolidation, LLC, Parnassos Holdings, LLC, Western NY Cablevision, LP, Motorola, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., ARRIS Group,

4

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 6 of 13

Inc., Thomson, Inc., Ambit Microsystems, Inc., and NETGEAR, Inc. In the case of Comcast Corporation, this definition includes, without limitation, Sedna. 8. As used herein, "Ambit," "you," or "your" means Ambit Microsystems, Inc. and

its agents, subsidiaries, related entities, affiliated companies, predecessors, successors, assigns, officers, directors, partners, employees, representatives (in their individual or representative capacities), affiliates of any kind or nature, or any person or entity acting on their behalf. 9. As used herein, "Rembrandt" shall mean Rembrandt Technologies, LP including

without limitation all of its corporate locations, and all predecessors, and affiliates, and all past or present directors, officers, agents, representatives, employees, consultants, and attorneys. 10. The terms "and" and "or" shall be construed disjunctively or conjunctively as

necessary to bring within the scope of these requests all documents which might otherwise be construed to be outside their scope. 11. The term "all" shall mean any and all, and the term "any" shall mean any and all,

unless the context clearly requires otherwise. 12. References to the singular shall include the plural, and references to the plural

shall include the singular as may be appropriate or construe the individual topics for examination in the broadest form. 13. The masculine form of a noun or pronoun shall be considered to include within its

meaning the feminine form of the noun or pronoun, and vice versa as may be appropriate to make the individual topics for examination inclusive rather than exclusive. 14. Any reference to any individual person, either singularly or as a part of a defined

group, includes that individual person's employees, agents, successors, assignees, heirs, and representatives.

5

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 7 of 13

15.

The term "Patents-in-Suit" shall mean United States patents numbers: 6,131,159;

5,710,761; 5,778,234; 6,950,444; 5,008,903; 4,937,819; 5,719,858; and 5,852,631. 16. As used herein, the term "CableLabs" shall mean Cable Television Laboratories,

Inc. and its agents, subsidiaries, related entities, affiliated companies, predecessors, successors, assigns, officers, directors, partners, employees, representatives (in their individual or representative capacities), affiliates of any kind or nature, or any person or entity acting on their behalf. 17. The term "cable industry" shall mean entities, including but not limited to the

MSO Defendants, that provide "cable services" within the meaning of 47 U.S.C. § 522(6) or that provide to such entities information, products, or services related to the provision of cable services within the meaning of 47 U.S.C. § 522(6). 18. The term "Accused Products and Services" shall include all of Defendants'

services or products that involve in any way a cable modem or the use of a cable modem, including but not limited to providing high speed cable internet services and VoIP services. 19. The term "DOCSIS" shall refer to the commonly known industry specifications

referred to as DOCSIS 1.0, DOCSIS 1.1, DOCSIS 2.0, and DOCSIS 3.0. 20. "DOCSIS-Compliant Devices" include cable modems or cable modem

termination systems that comply with any of the DOCSIS 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, or 3.0 specifications, manufactured, sold, leased, offered for sale or used by the Defendants. 21. As used herein, "Rembrandt multi-district litigation" means the litigation styled In

re Rembrandt Technologies, LP Patent Litig., MDL Docket No. 07-md-1848 (D. Del.), and the cases of which the multi-district litigation is comprised, including: Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Cablevision Systems Corp. et al., Civil Action No. 1:06-635 (D. Del.); Coxcom, Inc. v.

6

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 8 of 13

Rembrandt Technologies, LP, C.A. No. 1:06-721 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. CBS Corp., C.A. No. 1:06-727 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. NBC Universal, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-730 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. ABC, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-730 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:06-731 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Adelphia Communications Corp., et al., Bky. Advy. No. 1:06-1739 (Bankr. SDNY); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Adelphia Communications Corp., C.A. No. 1:07-214 (SDNY); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Comcast Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:05-443 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Sharp Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-47 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 2:06223 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., C.A. No. 2:06-224 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., C.A. No. 2:06-369 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Comcast Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-506 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-507 (E.D. Tex.). 22. "Related Action" means each case of which the multi-district litigation is

comprised (see ¶ 15 above), as well as Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Harris Corp., C.A. No. 07C-09-059-JRS (Del. Super. Ct.) and Motorola, Inc., et al. v. Rembrandt Technologies, LP, C.A. No. 07-752 (D. Del.).

TOPICS FOR EXAMINATION 1. 2. When and how Ambit first became aware of each of the Patents-in-Suit. Who within Ambit first became aware of each of the Patents-in-Suit.

7

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 9 of 13

3.

What investigation, if any, Ambit conducted after becoming aware of any of the

Patents-in-Suit to determine whether said patent(s) was valid, infringed, enforceable, or licensed. 4. Any analysis, opinion, or inquiry regarding potential infringement of the claims in

each of the Patents-in-Suit, including, but not limited to any pre-litigation and postcommencement-of-litigation investigations performed by or on behalf of you, your partners, your licensors, your customers, your resellers, and/or your affiliates, related to the potential infringement by any products or systems made, used, offered for sale, and/or sold by you, your partners, your licensors, your customers, you resellers, and/or your affiliates. 5. 6. Efforts by Ambit to design any products around the Patents-in-Suit. Ambit's policies and/or customs, whether in writing or oral, on investigating or

refraining from investigating whether Ambit's products and/or services, whether existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties. 7. Ambit's communications, whether internal or external, regarding whether to

investigate if the Accused Products and Services infringed any patents owned by a third party. 8. Ambit's communications, whether internal or external, regarding each of the

Patents-in-Suit after Ambit became aware of them. 9. Ambit's investigations into whether Ambit's products and/or services, whether

existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties. 10. The role of Sedna Services LLC in investigating whether Ambit's products and/or

services, whether existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties. 11. Ambit's understanding of the custom or practice in its industry to investigate

whether products and/or services, whether existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties.

8

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 10 of 13

EXHIBIT B 1. All documents and things considered, reviewed, or prepared by Ambit in the

course of preparing for the 30(b)(6) deposition on the subjects listed above in Exhibit A.

9

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 11 of 13

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Rebecca A. Beynon, hereby certify that on the first day of August, 2008, a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Videotaped Oral Deposition to Ambit Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) to be served upon the following in the manner indicated: BY E-MAIL

Jack B. Blumenfield Karen Jacobs Louden Rodger D. Smith II Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP 1201 North Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

John W. Shaw Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street, 17th Floor P.O. Box 391 Wilmington, DE 19899-0391 [email protected]

Richard K. Hermann Mary B. Matterer Amy Arnott Quinlan Morris James LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801-1494 [email protected]

Richard D. Kirk Scott G. Wilcox Stephen B. Brauerman Bayard, PA 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 P.O. Box 25130 Wilmington, DE 19899 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Fredrick L. Cottrell, III Kelly E. Farnan Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. One Rodney Square 920 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 [email protected] [email protected]

Peter J. Toren Lawrence B. Goodwin Monica V. Bhattacharyya Stefan R. Stoyanov Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP 1633 Broadway New York, NY 10019 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

10

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 12 of 13

Josh A. Drevitt Charles J. Bourdreau Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 200 Park Avenue, 47th Floor New York, New York 10166-0193 [email protected] [email protected]

David Segal Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3161 Michelson Drive Irvina, California 92612-4412 [email protected]

Amanda J. Tessar Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1801 California Street, Suite 4200 Denver, CO 80202-2642 [email protected]

David S. Benyacar Daniel L. Reisner Kaye Scholer LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 [email protected] [email protected]

Matthew D. Powers Edward R. Reines Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 [email protected] [email protected]

John Desmarais Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022 [email protected]

Robert A. Van Nest Brian L. Ferrall Daralyn J. Durie Leo L. Lam Matthew M. Werdegar Keker & Van Nest LLP 710 Sansome Street San Franscisco, CA 94111 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Mitchell Stockwell Kilpatrick & Stockton LLP 110 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309 [email protected]

Eric R. Lamison Kirkland & Ellis LLP 555 California Street, Ste. 2700 San Francisco, CA 94104 [email protected]

Richard Brown Day Pitney LLP 200 Campus Drive Florham Park, NJ 07932 [email protected]

11

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-3

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 13 of 13

Bradford P. Lyerla Kevin D. Hogg Charles E. Juister Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6357 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Gerald Levy Day Pitney LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 [email protected]

Jonathan Tropp Day Pitney LLP One Canterbury Green 201 Broad Street Stamford, CT 06901 [email protected]

By: _/s/ Rebecca A. Beynon______ Rebecca A. Beynon [email protected]

12

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 1 of 14

EXHIBIT C

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 2 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE _________________________________________ ) ) In re: REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP ) PATENT LITIGATION ) ) ) _________________________________________ )

MDL Docket No. 07-md-1848 (GMS) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF'S PARTIAL NOTICE OF VIDEOTAPED ORAL DEPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO RULE 30(B)(6) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Plaintiff" or "Rembrandt") will take the deposition of ARRIS Group, Inc. ("you" or "ARRIS Group") beginning at 9:00 a.m., in the offices of KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C., 1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400, Washington, D.C. 20036 on August 18, 2008, or at such time and place agreed to by counsel for the parties. The deposition will be taken pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 30 of the Court's Local Rules before an officer and reporter authorized to administer oaths. The deposition will be videotaped and recorded by stenographic means. As required by Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, you shall designate one or more officers, directors, managing agents, employees, or other sufficiently knowledgeable persons who consents to testify on your behalf with respect to each of the matters set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, and the person(s) so designated shall be required to testify as to each of those matters known or reasonably available to you. Please provide notice of the identity of the witness(es) designated by you to counsel for Rembrandt no later than ten (10) business days prior to the date on which the deposition shall commence.

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 3 of 14

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 30(b)(2) and Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, you are required to produce the documents listed in Exhibit B at or before the noticed deposition herein. You are further required to produce prior to the deposition any and all information or material previously requested in discovery, but not yet produced. Rembrandt reserves the right to amend or supplement this notice and these exhibits as more information becomes available to Rembrandt during the course of discovery.

Dated: August 1, 2008

Respectfully Submitted,

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C.

Collins J. Seitz, Jr. (#2237) Francis DiGiovanni (#3189) James D. Heisman (#2746) Kristen Healey Cramer (#4512) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP 1007 N. Orange Street P.O. Box 2207 Wilmington, Delaware 19899 (302) 658-9141 Max L. Tribble, Jr. SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77002-5096 (713) 651-9366 Brooke A.M. Taylor Edgar Sargent Matthew R. Berry SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington 98101-3000 (206) 516-3880

By: _/s/ Rebecca A. Beynon___________ Mark C. Hansen J.C. Rozendaal Aaron M. Panner Rebecca A. Beynon KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C. 1615 M. Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 326-7900 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Attorneys for Rembrandt

2

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 4 of 14

EXHIBIT A DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply to this Notice of Deposition and are deemed to be incorporated into each subject listed below: 1. The phrase "relating to" means discussing, describing, referring to, pertaining to,

containing, analyzing, studying, reporting on, commenting on, evidencing, constituting, setting forth, considering, recommending, concerning, or pertaining to, in whole or in part. 2. The term "document" or "documents" is used in the broadest sense permitted by

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and means the original (or any copy when originals are not available) and any drafts or non-identical copies thereof, whether different from the original because of interlineation, receipt stamp, notation of copy sent or received or otherwise, of any book, pamphlet, periodical, letter, report, note, memorandum, record, minutes, calendar or diary entry, transcript, study, compilation, patent, patent application, analysis, tabulation, map, diagram, drawing, plan, picture, summary, working paper, chart, paper, graph index, data sheet, data processing card, computer printout, summary of a computer printout, tape, contract, agreement, lease, ledger, journal, balance sheet, account, invoice, purchase order, receipt, billing record, financial data, financial statement, file, diary, film, trip tickets, telex, teletype or other messages, telegram, expense vouchers, instructions, bulletins or any other writing or recording of information, however produced, recorded, maintained or reproduced, including any electronic or mechanical recording of any oral material, within the possession, custody or control of defendant or any of its officers, directors, employees, attorneys, or other agents and/or representatives. 3. The term "including" shall mean including but not limited to.

3

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 5 of 14

4.

The term "person" means natural person, corporation, firm, company, sole

proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, association, institute, or other business, legal or governmental entity or association, including any directors, officers, employees, agents or representatives thereof. 5. The term "communication" (or any variant thereof) means any contact between or

among two or more Persons and shall include, without limitation, written contact by means such as letters, memoranda, telegrams, telecopies, telexes, e-mail, or any other document; the transmittal of information by any means; any oral contact such as face-to-face meetings or telephone conversations; and any writings memorializing such oral contact. 6. "Thing" means any tangible object other than a Document including, without

limitation, objects of every kind and nature, as well as prototypes, models, drafts, or specimens thereof. 7. As used herein, "the Defendant(s)" means the following entities and their

subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, successors or assignees, and their respective officers, directors, employees, and agents: Time Warner Cable, Inc., Time Warner Cable LLC, Time Warner New York Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company, LP, Time Warner Entertainment­ Advance/Newhouse Partnership, Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc., Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc., CSC Holdings, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Adelphia Communications Corporation, Century-TCI California, LP, Century-TCI California Communications, LP, Century-TCI Holdings, LLC, Parnassos, LP, Parnassos Communications, LP, Adelphia Consolidation, LLC, Parnassos Holdings, LLC, Western NY Cablevision, LP, Motorola, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., ARRIS Group,

4

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 6 of 14

Inc., Thomson, Inc., Ambit Microsystems, Inc., and NETGEAR, Inc. In the case of Comcast Corporation, this definition includes, without limitation, Sedna. 8. As used herein, "ARRIS Group," "you," or "your" means ARRIS Group, Inc. and

its agents, subsidiaries, related entities, affiliated companies, predecessors, successors, assigns, officers, directors, partners, employees, representatives (in their individual or representative capacities), affiliates of any kind or nature, or any person or entity acting on their behalf. 9. As used herein, "Rembrandt" shall mean Rembrandt Technologies, LP including

without limitation all of its corporate locations, and all predecessors, and affiliates, and all past or present directors, officers, agents, representatives, employees, consultants, and attorneys. 10. The terms "and" and "or" shall be construed disjunctively or conjunctively as

necessary to bring within the scope of these requests all documents which might otherwise be construed to be outside their scope. 11. The term "all" shall mean any and all, and the term "any" shall mean any and all,

unless the context clearly requires otherwise. 12. References to the singular shall include the plural, and references to the plural

shall include the singular as may be appropriate or construe the individual topics for examination in the broadest form. 13. The masculine form of a noun or pronoun shall be considered to include within its

meaning the feminine form of the noun or pronoun, and vice versa as may be appropriate to make the individual topics for examination inclusive rather than exclusive. 14. Any reference to any individual person, either singularly or as a part of a defined

group, includes that individual person's employees, agents, successors, assignees, heirs, and representatives.

5

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 7 of 14

15.

The term "Patents-in-Suit" shall mean United States patents numbers: 6,131,159;

5,710,761; 5,778,234; 6,950,444; 5,008,903; 4,937,819; 5,719,858; and 5,852,631. 16. As used herein, the term "CableLabs" shall mean Cable Television Laboratories,

Inc. and its agents, subsidiaries, related entities, affiliated companies, predecessors, successors, assigns, officers, directors, partners, employees, representatives (in their individual or representative capacities), affiliates of any kind or nature, or any person or entity acting on their behalf. 17. The term "cable industry" shall mean entities, including but not limited to the

MSO Defendants, that provide "cable services" within the meaning of 47 U.S.C. § 522(6) or that provide to such entities information, products, or services related to the provision of cable services within the meaning of 47 U.S.C. § 522(6). 18. The term "Accused Products and Services" shall include all of Defendants'

services or products that involve in any way a cable modem or the use of a cable modem, including but not limited to providing high speed cable internet services and VoIP services. 19. The term "DOCSIS" shall refer to the commonly known industry specifications

referred to as DOCSIS 1.0, DOCSIS 1.1, DOCSIS 2.0, and DOCSIS 3.0. 20. "DOCSIS-Compliant Devices" include cable modems or cable modem

termination systems that comply with any of the DOCSIS 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, or 3.0 specifications, manufactured, sold, leased, offered for sale or used by the Defendants. 21. As used herein, "Rembrandt multi-district litigation" means the litigation styled In

re Rembrandt Technologies, LP Patent Litig., MDL Docket No. 07-md-1848 (D. Del.), and the cases of which the multi-district litigation is comprised, including: Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Cablevision Systems Corp. et al., Civil Action No. 1:06-635 (D. Del.); Coxcom, Inc. v.

6

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 8 of 14

Rembrandt Technologies, LP, C.A. No. 1:06-721 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. CBS Corp., C.A. No. 1:06-727 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. NBC Universal, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-730 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. ABC, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-730 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:06-731 (D. Del.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Adelphia Communications Corp., et al., Bky. Advy. No. 1:06-1739 (Bankr. SDNY); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Adelphia Communications Corp., C.A. No. 1:07-214 (SDNY); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Comcast Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:05-443 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Sharp Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-47 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 2:06223 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., C.A. No. 2:06-224 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., C.A. No. 2:06-369 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Comcast Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-506 (E.D. Tex.); Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-507 (E.D. Tex.). 22. "Related Action" means each case of which the multi-district litigation is

comprised (see ¶ 15 above), as well as Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Harris Corp., C.A. No. 07C-09-059-JRS (Del. Super. Ct.) and Motorola, Inc., et al. v. Rembrandt Technologies, LP, C.A. No. 07-752 (D. Del.).

TOPICS FOR EXAMINATION 1. 2. When and how ARRIS Group first became aware of each of the Patents-in-Suit. Who within ARRIS Group first became aware of each of the Patents-in-Suit.

7

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 9 of 14

3.

What investigation, if any, ARRIS Group conducted after becoming aware of any

of the Patents-in-Suit to determine whether said patent(s) was valid, infringed, enforceable, or licensed. 4. Any analysis, opinion, or inquiry regarding potential infringement of the claims in

each of the Patents-in-Suit, including, but not limited to any pre-litigation and postcommencement-of-litigation investigations performed by or on behalf of you, your partners, your licensors, your customers, your resellers, and/or your affiliates, related to the potential infringement by any products or systems made, used, offered for sale, and/or sold by you, your partners, your licensors, your customers, you resellers, and/or your affiliates. 5. 6. Efforts by ARRIS Group to design any products around the Patents-in-Suit. ARRIS Group's policies and/or customs, whether in writing or oral, on

investigating or refraining from investigating whether ARRIS Group's products and/or services, whether existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties. 7. ARRIS Group's communications, whether internal or external, regarding whether

to investigate if the Accused Products and Services infringed any patents owned by a third party. 8. ARRIS Group's communications, whether internal or external, regarding each of

the Patents-in-Suit after ARRIS Group became aware of them. 9. ARRIS Group's investigations into whether ARRIS Group's products and/or

services, whether existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties. 10. The role of Sedna Services LLC in investigating whether ARRIS Group's

products and/or services, whether existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties.

8

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 10 of 14

11.

ARRIS Group's understanding of the custom or practice in its industry to

investigate whether products and/or services, whether existing or newly introduced, infringe patents owned by third parties.

9

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 11 of 14

EXHIBIT B 1. All documents and things considered, reviewed, or prepared by ARRIS Group in

the course of preparing for the 30(b)(6) deposition on the subjects listed above in Exhibit A.

10

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 12 of 14

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Rebecca A. Beynon, hereby certify that on the first day of August, 2008, a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Videotaped Oral Deposition to ARRIS Group Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) to be served upon the following in the manner indicated: BY E-MAIL

Jack B. Blumenfield Karen Jacobs Louden Rodger D. Smith II Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP 1201 North Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

John W. Shaw Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street, 17th Floor P.O. Box 391 Wilmington, DE 19899-0391 [email protected]

Richard K. Hermann Mary B. Matterer Amy Arnott Quinlan Morris James LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801-1494 [email protected]

Richard D. Kirk Scott G. Wilcox Stephen B. Brauerman Bayard, PA 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 P.O. Box 25130 Wilmington, DE 19899 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Fredrick L. Cottrell, III Kelly E. Farnan Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. One Rodney Square 920 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 [email protected] [email protected]

Peter J. Toren Lawrence B. Goodwin Monica V. Bhattacharyya Stefan R. Stoyanov Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP 1633 Broadway New York, NY 10019 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

11

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 13 of 14

Josh A. Drevitt Charles J. Bourdreau Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 200 Park Avenue, 47th Floor New York, New York 10166-0193 [email protected] [email protected]

David Segal Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3161 Michelson Drive Irvina, California 92612-4412 [email protected]

Amanda J. Tessar Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1801 California Street, Suite 4200 Denver, CO 80202-2642 [email protected]

David S. Benyacar Daniel L. Reisner Kaye Scholer LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 [email protected] [email protected]

Matthew D. Powers Edward R. Reines Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 [email protected] [email protected]

John Desmarais Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022 [email protected]

Robert A. Van Nest Brian L. Ferrall Daralyn J. Durie Leo L. Lam Matthew M. Werdegar Keker & Van Nest LLP 710 Sansome Street San Franscisco, CA 94111 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Mitchell Stockwell Kilpatrick & Stockton LLP 110 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309 [email protected]

Eric R. Lamison Kirkland & Ellis LLP 555 California Street, Ste. 2700 San Francisco, CA 94104 [email protected]

Richard Brown Day Pitney LLP 200 Campus Drive Florham Park, NJ 07932 [email protected]

12

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-4

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 14 of 14

Bradford P. Lyerla Kevin D. Hogg Charles E. Juister Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6357 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Gerald Levy Day Pitney LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 [email protected]

Jonathan Tropp Day Pitney LLP One Canterbury Green 201 Broad Street Stamford, CT 06901 [email protected]

By: _/s/ Rebecca A. Beynon______ Rebecca A. Beynon [email protected]

13

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-5

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 1 of 15

EXHIBIT D

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-5

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 2 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE _________________________________________ ) ) In re: REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP ) PATENT LITIGATION ) ) ) _________________________________________ )

MDL Docket No. 07-md-1848 (GMS) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF'S PARTIAL NOTICE OF VIDEOTAPED ORAL DEPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO RULE 30(B)(6) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Plaintiff" or "Rembrandt") will take the deposition of CSC Holdings, Inc. and Cablevision Systems Corporation (collectively, "you" or "Cablevision") beginning at 9:00 a.m., in the offices of KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C., 1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400, Washington, D.C. 20036 on August 18, 2008, or at such time and place agreed to by counsel for the parties. The deposition will be taken pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 30 of the Court's Local Rules before an officer and reporter authorized to administer oaths. The deposition will be videotaped and recorded by stenographic means. As required by Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, you shall designate one or more officers, directors, managing agents, employees, or other sufficiently knowledgeable persons who consents to testify on your behalf with respect to each of the matters set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, and the person(s) so designated shall be required to testify as to each of those matters known or reasonably available to you. Please provide notice of the identity of the witness(es) designated by you to counsel for Rembrandt no later than ten (10) business days prior to the date on which the deposition shall commence.

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-5

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 3 of 15

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 30(b)(2) and Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, you are required to produce the documents listed in Exhibit B at or before the noticed deposition herein. You are further required to produce prior to the deposition any and all information or material previously requested in discovery, but not yet produced. Rembrandt reserves the right to amend or supplement this notice and these exhibits as more information becomes available to Rembrandt during the course of discovery.

Dated: August 1, 2008

Respectfully Submitted,

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C.

Collins J. Seitz, Jr. (#2237) Francis DiGiovanni (#3189) James D. Heisman (#2746) Kristen Healey Cramer (#4512) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP 1007 N. Orange Street P.O. Box 2207 Wilmington, Delaware 19899 (302) 658-9141 Max L. Tribble, Jr. SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77002-5096 (713) 651-9366

By: _/s/ Rebecca A. Beynon___________ Mark C. Hansen J.C. Rozendaal Aaron M. Panner Rebecca A. Beynon KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C. 1615 M. Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 326-7900 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

2

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-5

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 4 of 15

Brooke A.M. Taylor Edgar Sargent Matthew R. Berry SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington 98101-3000 (206) 516-3880

Attorneys for Rembrandt

3

Case 1:07-md-01848-GMS

Document 283-5

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 5 of 15

EXHIBIT A DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply to this Notice of Deposition and are deemed to be incorporated into each subject listed below: 1. The phrase "relating to" means discussing, describing, referring to, pertaining to,

containing, analyzing, studying, reporting on, commenting on, evidencing, constituting, setting forth, considering, recommending, concerning, or pertaining to, in whole or in part. 2. The term "document" or "docume