Free Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv-00405-JJF Document 32 Filed O2/28/2008 Page 1 0f 2
¤ *'m 2 2
can G *11* .. 1
§ v¤§§§§§ 0 Q 1 [
(xg CD 1···__ "5 1
G Q w E-? an f = — ·
Q G un SO fi pg ;j I
"¤ E3! I ¤_ "* 12 2 5 2
Q E N ¤ W e 4 ‘.
0 {£}O gy) QM Q 4 . H
E :2 GM E ? 1 ·
Qu 0 3 Q . . .
. vwdrmunl Hg ix ‘ _
mn cq iq ;*;- .
¤.-U. _.__; U _ OG · 4 ‘
wz g;c {
., dl LL mg ...:1 I `
_T:]"¤2=*=- ··?*._!|f _ x 20 IH ug zi? . .
L 2 Q22 . ¤ :*0 ** E 2
__ , . 5 ·_ MIz¢·1m s·~. . .1
‘ _..' if GY LL! Q E B H 2 3 . V
¤ ,...2*1. . *‘*Q»L¥J.! 1-I Z ‘
@3 j ;11—=Lz 1:11 e i 2
G _s LLIZILO vi ` 2 _
·~ g 1-2-:mb- 0 * 1
Q? 11 >;;*3 Q *
2 &Ez§ * 2
E—l§iI?J -~ ..2: .
meds u
A z&m3 m
EE'] 2 2 Pg 2 . {__ L ..
suv .3 °¤ §'“2° F·
1 ·‘; ’ I . g
· 1F` CD agi? E _
2 N z-M we 1 —
1 ¤= gf.?
EYE.? C`! EEO ng] 2
22 ¤¤ §E im z
1G;} hg T.E . gl 1
{ mw 1 qq i
2 E 1 ‘*‘
_ ‘ unl 1
**Â¥Zi 1 - 2
2 2 ’”2' 2 2
. !]'a _ .
{ ·:··I2 ‘
1 · a
W .2 1
1: ” 2 2 2 ·
= § g- .
M U g m Q 2
- *-· H u GN 1
2 U 5 '— cn . 1 2 ‘
""' rn · 1 .`
E D 3 E Q 2 I `\
H-4 va b ·-· -¤ 2
° 2 v¤ 3 5
- 3 S =¤· - E 1
;,·;,· cn .5 1: O 1
25 —¤ bd E 2 ‘
3 · §°
2E¤.z "" 1 ‘
:·:,n.1§ 1
m2 Q
B
1

Case 1:07-ov-OO405—JJF Document 32 Filed O2/28/2008 Pa? 2 of 2 K
x K@
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` . FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
RAYMOND E. BLAKE, ANTHONY M. Y y
vg y WALKER, MICHAEL A. JOY, and ¤ ,
--ANTHONY D. ROGERS, ‘ A ; - - Y · ~ -- -
Plaintiffs, E j
p_y,_ _ _ _V· y ; Civil Action No, 07-405-JJF A
D ‘HEALTHCARE CMS, WARDEN RAPHAEL1 D
WILLIAMS, COMMISSIONER CARL C.;
DANBERG, GOVERNOR RUTH ANN ; N ._
g MINNER, and MAYOR JAMES M. ¤ . C * ¢
_ BAKER, _ ;,_ _ . H
-a Defendants. U ` l · L ; D- ?* I n" 11
D D D D QBQEB D D ‘ l A
I N-D D .WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a sivil rights action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983 without prepayment of the filingDfee;,
WHEREAS, this Court granted Plaintiff Raymond E. Blake
DD DD D D DD DLDDVG of f€€S, E.I"1d OI'l
September 12,:2007, entered an Order requiring Blake to complete
1 D and return an authorization form within thirty days or the case
U would be dismissed (D.I. 18);
WHEREAS, the time period has lapsed, and to date the
authorization form has not been received from Blake;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, Anthony M. Walker (“Walker”) and
Anthony D. Rogers (“Rogers”), were prisoners incarcerated at the
Howard R. Young Correctional Institution, Wilmington, Delaware at
the time they filed their Complaint under 42 U.S.C, § 1983, along
with applications to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28