Free Remark - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 6,735.3 kB
Pages: 212
Date: September 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 10,956 Words, 65,651 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38555/49.pdf

Download Remark - District Court of Delaware ( 6,735.3 kB)


Preview Remark - District Court of Delaware
CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 49 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 10 Page 1 of 10

CLOSED, DISCMAG, JURY, PATENT

U.S. District Court [LIVE] Eastern District of TEXAS LIVE (Marshall) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE

Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Comcast Corporation et al Assigned to: Judge T. John Ward Referred to: Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP

Date Filed: 11/30/2006 Jury Demand: Both Nature of Suit: 830 Patent Jurisdiction: Federal Question

represented by Max Lalon Tribble, Jr Susman Godfrey LLP 1000 Louisiana Street Ste 5100 Houston, TX 77002-5096 713/651-9366 Fax: 17136546666 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Andrew Wesley Spangler Brown McCarroll - Longview 1127 Judson Rd - Ste 220 PO Box 3999 Longview, TX 75606-3999 903-236-9800 Fax: 19032368787 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Brooke Ashley-May Taylor Susman Godfrey, LLP - Seattle 1201 Third Avenue Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101 206/516-3880 Fax: 206/516-3883 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Charles Ainsworth Parker Bunt & Ainsworth 100 E Ferguson Suite 1114 Tyler, TX 75702 US

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?684707263651257-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 49 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 10 Page 2 of 10

903/531-3535 Fax: 903/533-9687 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Collin Michael Maloney Ireland Carroll & Kelley 6101 S Broadway Suite 500 Tyler, TX 75703 903/561-1600 Fax: 9035811071 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Edgar G Sargent Susman Godfrey, LLP - Seattle 1201 Third Avenue Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101 206/516-3804 Fax: 206/516-3883 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Elizabeth L DeRieux Brown McCarroll 1127 Judson Rd - Ste 220 PO Box 3999 Longview, TX 75606-3999 903/236-9800 Fax: 9032368787 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Franklin Jones, Jr Jones & Jones - Marshall 201 W Houston St PO Drawer 1249 Marshall, TX 75670 903/938-4395 Fax: 9039383360 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED James Patrick Kelley Ireland Carroll & Kelley 6101 S Broadway Suite 500 Tyler, TX 75703

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?684707263651257-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 49 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 3 of 10 Page 3 of 10

903/561-1600 Fax: 9035811071 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Joseph Samuel Grinstein Susman Godfrey - Houston 1000 Louisiana Street Ste 5100 Houston, TX 77002-5096 713/651-9366 Fax: 7136546666 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Matthew R Berry Susman Godfrey, LLP - Seattle 1201 Third Avenue Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101 206/373-7394 Fax: 206/516-3883 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Otis W Carroll, Jr Ireland Carroll & Kelley 6101 S Broadway Suite 500 Tyler, TX 75703 903/561-1600 Fax: 9035811071 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Robert Christopher Bunt Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C. 100 East Ferguson, Ste. 1114 Tyler, TX 75702 903/531-3535 Fax: 903/533-9687 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Robert M Parker Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C. 100 E Ferguson Suite 1114 Tyler, TX 75702 903/531-3535

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?684707263651257-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 49 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 4 of 10 Page 4 of 10

Fax: 9035339687 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III Brown McCarroll - Longview 1127 Judson Rd - Ste 220 PO Box 3999 Longview, TX 75606-3999 903/236-9800 Fax: 19032368787 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Tibor L. Nagy Susman Godfrey - Houston 1000 Louisiana Street Ste 5100 Houston, TX 77002-5096 713/653-7850 Fax: 713/654-6102 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Defendant Comcast Corporation Defendant Comcast Cable Communications, LLC Defendant Comcast of Plano, LP Movant Coxcom, Inc., Counter Claimant Comcast Corporation represented by Jennifer Haltom Doan Haltom and Doan LLP 6500 North Summerhill Road Crown Executive Center Suite 1 A P O Box 6227 Texarkana, Tx 75505 903/255-1000 Fax: 903/255-0800 Email: [email protected]

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?684707263651257-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 49 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 5 of 10 Page 5 of 10

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Counter Claimant Comcast Cable Communications, LLC represented by Jennifer Haltom Doan (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Counter Claimant Comcast of Plano, LP represented by Jennifer Haltom Doan (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Counter Defendant Rembrandt Technologies, LP represented by Brooke Ashley-May Taylor (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Joseph Samuel Grinstein (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Matthew R Berry (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 11/30/2006

#

Docket Text 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast of Plano, LP (Filing fee $ 350.) , filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 Civil Cover Sheet)(ehs, ) (Entered: 12/01/2006) 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (ehs, ) (Entered: 12/01/2006) 3 Form mailed to Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks. (ehs, ) (Entered: 12/01/2006) E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Issued as to Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast of Plano, LP. (ehs, ) (Entered: 12/01/2006) 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT (First Amended Complaint) against all defendants, filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A# (2) Exhibit B# (3) Exhibit C# (4) Exhibit D# (5) Exhibit E)

11/30/2006 11/30/2006 11/30/2006

12/01/2006

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?684707263651257-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 49 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 6 of 10 Page 6 of 10

(DeRieux, Elizabeth) Additional attachment(s) added on 12/1/2006 (ehs, ). (Entered: 12/01/2006) 12/04/2006 12/07/2006 12/07/2006 12/07/2006 12/12/2006 12/12/2006 Filing fee: $ 350.00, receipt number 2-1-2127 (ch, ) (Entered: 12/05/2006) 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert M Parker on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Parker, Robert) (Entered: 12/07/2006) 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Christopher Bunt on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Bunt, Robert) (Entered: 12/07/2006) 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Charles Ainsworth on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Ainsworth, Charles) (Entered: 12/07/2006) 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Franklin Jones, Jr on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Jones, Franklin) (Entered: 12/12/2006) 9 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC served on 12/4/2006, answer due 12/26/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 12/15/2006) 10 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Comcast Corporation served on 12/4/2006, answer due 12/26/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 12/15/2006) 11 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against Rembrandt Technologies, LP by Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast of Plano, LP.(Doan, Jennifer) (Entered: 12/21/2006) 12 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Comcast of Plano, LP served on 12/13/2006, answer due 1/2/2007. (ehs, ) (Entered: 12/27/2006) 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew R. Berry on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP, Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Berry, Matthew) (Entered: 01/03/2007) 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brooke Ashley-May Taylor on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP, Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Taylor, Brooke) (Entered: 01/03/2007) 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph Samuel Grinstein on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP, Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Grinstein, Joseph) (Entered: 01/03/2007) 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Tibor L. Nagy on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Nagy, Tibor) (Entered: 01/09/2007) 17 Plaintiff's ANSWER to Counterclaim by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Tribble, Max) (Entered: 01/09/2007) 21 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Edgar G Sargent for Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (ch, ) (Entered: 01/19/2007)

12/12/2006

12/21/2006

12/26/2006

01/03/2007

01/03/2007

01/03/2007

01/09/2007 01/09/2007 01/12/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?684707263651257-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 49 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 7 of 10 Page 7 of 10

01/12/2007 01/15/2007 01/15/2007 01/15/2007 03/09/2007

Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Sargent; Fee: $25, receipt number: 2-12206 (ch, ) (Entered: 01/19/2007) 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Otis W Carroll, Jr on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Carroll, Otis) (Entered: 01/15/2007) 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Collin Michael Maloney on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Maloney, Collin) (Entered: 01/15/2007) 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Patrick Kelley on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Kelley, James) (Entered: 01/15/2007) 22 NOTICE by Coxcom, Inc., of Filing Motion for Transfer and Consolidation of Rembrandt Technologies, LP Patent Litigation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 (Attachments: # 1 MDL Motion for Transfer and Consolidation# 2 Motion Ex. A# 3 Motion Ex. B# 4 MDL Memorandum# 5 MDL Exhibit List# 6 MLD Notice of Appearance# 7 MDL Corporate Disclosure# 8 MDL Certificate of Service)(Stockwell, Mitchell) (Entered: 03/09/2007) 23 Additional Attachments to Main Document: 22 Notice (Other), Notice (Other).. (Attachments: # 1 MDL Ex. 1# 2 MDL Ex. 2# 3 MDL Ex. 3# 4 MDL Ex. 4# 5 MDL Ex. 5# 6 MDL Ex. 6# 7 MDL Ex. 7# 8 MDL Ex. 8# 9 MDL Ex. 9# 10 MDL Ex. 10# 11 MDL Ex. 11# 12 MDL Ex. 12# 13 MDL Ex. 13# 14 MDL Ex. 14# 15 MDL Ex. 15# 16 MDL Ex. 16# 17 MDL Ex. 17# 18 MDL Ex. 18# 19 MDL Ex. 19# 20 MDL Ex. 20# 21 MDL Ex. 21# 22 MDL Ex. 22# 23 MDL Ex. 23# 24 MDL Ex. 24# 25 MDL Ex. 25# 26 MDL Ex. 26# 27 MDL Ex. 27# 28 MDL Ex. 28# 29 MDL Ex. 29# 30 MDL Ex. 30# 31 MDL Ex. 31# 32 MDL Ex. 32# 33 MDL Ex. 33# 34 MDL Ex. 34# 35 MDL Ex. 35# 36 MDL Ex. 35# 37 MDL Ex. 37# 38 MDL Ex. 38# 39 MDL Ex. 39# 40 MDL Ex. 40# 41 MDL Ex. 41# 42 MDL Ex. 42# 43 MDL Ex. 43)(Stockwell, Mitchell) (Entered: 03/09/2007) 24 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP Joint Notice of Conference Regarding Proposed Discovery Order and Docket Control Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Discovery Order and Docket Control Order) (Taylor, Brooke) (Entered: 03/30/2007) 25 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP re 23 Additional Attachments to Main Document,,,, 22 Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Notice of Filing Opposition to CoxComs Motion for Transfer and Consolidation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Rembrandts Brief in Opposition# 2 Exhibit Exhibit list# 3 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 1# 4 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 2# 5 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 3# 6 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 4# 7 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 5# 8 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 6# 9 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 7# 10 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 8# 11 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 9# 12 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 10# 13 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 11# 14 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 12# 15 Exhibit Opposition Brief Exh 13# 16 Exhibit Response to CoxComs Motion# 17 Exhibit Reason Why Oral Argument Should Be Heard# 18 Exhibit Proof of Service)(Taylor,

03/09/2007

03/30/2007

04/05/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?684707263651257-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 49 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 8 of 10 Page 8 of 10

Brooke) (Entered: 04/05/2007) 04/11/2007 26 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew Wesley Spangler on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Spangler, Andrew) (Entered: 04/11/2007) 27 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Capshaw, Sidney) (Entered: 04/11/2007) 28 ORDER - referring case to Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham in accordance with the assignments made by General Order 07-03. The magistrate judge shall conduct pre-trial proceedins pursuant to 28 USC 636. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 4/18/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 04/18/2007) 29 NOTICE by Coxcom, Inc., Notice of Development (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Hearing)(Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 04/18/2007) 30 ORDER - REGARDING THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND DOCUMENT PRODUCTION. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 4/19/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 04/19/2007) 31 DOCKET CONTROL ORDER Respond to Amended Pleadings 11/30/07. Amended Pleadings due by 11/16/2007. Discovery due by 5/14/2008. Joinder of Parties due by 5/3/2007. Claims Construction Hearing set for 2/13/2008 - 2/14/08 9:00 AM before Judge T. John Ward. Motions in limine due by 7/21/2008. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 7/21/2008. Jury Selection set for 8/4/2008 9:00AM before Judge T. John Ward. Pretrial Conference set for 7/24/2008 9:30 AM before Judge T. John Ward. Privilege Logs are to be exchanged by 6/4/07. All other deadlines are set forth herein. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 4/19/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 04/19/2007) 32 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP Of Proposed Protective Order (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Protective Order)(Taylor, Brooke) CORRECTED PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER added on 4/25/2007 (mpv, ). Modified on 4/25/2007 (mpv, ). (Entered: 04/24/2007) 33 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP Re Electronic Production (Taylor, Brooke) (Entered: 04/24/2007) NOTICE re 32 Notice (Other) CORRECTED PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER ADDED BY CLERK (mpv, ) (Entered: 04/25/2007) 34 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Charles Everingham : Scheduling Conference held on 4/30/2007. (Court Reporter Debbie Latham.)(delat, ) (Entered: 04/30/2007) TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings Scheduling Conference held on 4/3/07 before Judge Chad Everingham. Court Reporter: Transcriber/Susan Simmons. (lss) (Entered: 05/03/2007)

04/11/2007

04/18/2007

04/18/2007 04/19/2007

04/19/2007

04/24/2007

04/24/2007 04/25/2007

04/30/2007

05/03/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?684707263651257-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 49 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 9 of 10 Page 9 of 10

05/04/2007 05/07/2007 05/07/2007 05/23/2007 06/04/2007

36 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 5/4/07. (ehs, ) (Entered: 05/04/2007) 37 NOTICE of Disclosure by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Berry, Matthew) (Entered: 05/07/2007) 38 NOTICE of Disclosure by Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (Doan, Jennifer) (Entered: 05/07/2007) 39 NOTICE of Disclosure by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Taylor, Brooke) (Entered: 05/23/2007) 40 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct Docket Control Order by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Motion to Amend)(Taylor, Brooke) (Entered: 06/04/2007) 41 ORDER granting 40 Motion to Amend/Correct. Docket Control Order is amended to move date to exchange privilege logs to 7/10/07. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 6/5/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 06/06/2007) 42 NOTICE of Disclosure by Rembrandt Technologies, LP Regarding Compliance with Paragraph 3(b) of the Discovery Order (Berry, Matthew) (Entered: 06/12/2007) 43 NOTICE by Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast of Plano, LP Notice of Multi-District Litigation Developments Pursuant to Local Rule CV-42 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Doan, Jennifer) (Entered: 06/21/2007) 44 NOTICE by Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast of Plano, LP of Multi-District Litigation Developments Pursuant to Local Rule CV-42 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 06/21/2007) 45 Interdistrict transfer to the District of Delaware, Wilmington DE. Pursuant to letter Elizabeth Dinan was notified. Certified copy of Docket Sheet, Complaint, Transfer Order and letter were mailed to the Federal Blding, Lockbox 18,844 N. King Street, Wilmington, DE (ch, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 6/28/2007 (ch, ). Additional attachment(s) added on 6/28/2007 (ch, ). Modified on 6/28/2007 (ch, ). (Entered: 06/27/2007)

06/06/2007

06/12/2007

06/21/2007

06/21/2007

06/25/2007

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
07/02/2007 13:27:26 PACER Login: Description: ud0037 Docket Report Client Code: Search Criteria: 2:06-cv-00506-TJWCE

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?684707263651257-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 49 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 10 of 10 Page 10 of 10

Billable Pages: 5

Cost:

0.40

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?684707263651257-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-2 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 26

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/11/2007

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-2 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 26

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/11/2007

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-3 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 27

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/11/2007

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-3 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 27

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/11/2007

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-4 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 28

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/18/2007

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-5 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 1 of 3 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COMCAST CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ )

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP

Case No. 2:05-CV-443-TJW

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COMCAST CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TIME WARNER CABLE, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________________ ) REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP

Case No. 2:06-CV-506-TJW

Case No. 2:06-CV-369-TJW

Case No. 2:06-CV-224-TJW

US2000 9929402.1 C8490-331049

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-5 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 2 of 3 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 3

) Defendant. ) _____________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ) ET AL. ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ) ET AL. ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP

Case No. 2:06-CV-507-TJW

Case No. 2:06-CV-223-TJW

NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT Defendants Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Operating, LLC., CoxCom, Inc., and Time Warner Cable, Inc. provide this notice of development. Attached is a Notice of Hearing issued by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, calendaring for hearing on May 31, 2007, the motion of CoxCom, Inc. for transfer and consolidation of the Rembrandt Technologies, LP, patent litigation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407.

US2000 9929402.1 C8490-331049

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-5 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 3 3 of 3 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 3

Dated: April 18th, 2007. Respectfully Submitted /s/ Allen F. Gardner Michael E. Jones Texas State Bar No. 10929400 [email protected] Diane V. DeVasto Texas State Bar No. 05784100 [email protected] Allen F. Gardner Texas State Bar No. 24043679 [email protected] POTTER MINTON, P.C. 110 North College 500 Plaza Tower Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Facsimile: (903) 593-0846 ATTORNEYS FOR CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., LLP, CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC, COXCOM, INC., AND TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the following counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served this 18th day of April, 2007, with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date. /s/ Allen F. Gardner Allen F. Gardner

US2000 9929402.1 C8490-331049

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 1 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 2 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 3 3 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 4 4 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 5 5 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 6 6 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 7 7 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 8 8 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 9 9 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 10 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 10 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 11 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 11 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 12 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 12 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 13 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 13 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 14 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 14 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 15 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 15 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 16 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 16 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 17 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 17 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 18 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 18 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 19 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 19 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 20 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 20 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 21 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 21 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 22 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 22 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 23 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 23 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 24 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 24 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 25 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 25 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 26 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 26 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 27 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 27 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 28 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 28 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 29 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 29 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 30 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 30 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 31 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 31 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 32 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 32 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 33 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 33 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 34 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 34 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 35 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 35 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 36 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 36 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 37 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 37 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 38 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 38 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 39 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 39 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 40 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 40 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 41 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 41 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 42 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 42 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 43 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 43 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-6 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 29-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 44 of 44 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 44 of 44

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-7 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 30

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/19/2007

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL. § § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-223(TJW)

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.

§ § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-224(TJW)

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.

§ § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-369(TJW)

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. COMCAST CORPORATION, ET AL.

§ § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-506(TJW)

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL.

§ § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-507(TJW)

ORDER REGARDING THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND DOCUMENT PRODUCTION

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-7 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 30

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/19/2007

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

At the Scheduling Conference in the above five captioned cases, the Parties informed the Court that they were continuing to discuss the form of protective order to be entered in all five cases as well as the form of production for documents produced electronically and requested additional time to reach agreement or inform the Court of their disagreements. Pursuant to the Parties request, the Court hereby grants the Parties twenty-one (21) days from the date of Scheduling Conference, which is until Tuesday, April 24, 2007, to: 1. file an agreed upon Protective Order with the Court or inform the Court of the provisions in a proposed Protective Order on which the Parties cannot reach agreement and 2. inform the Court that the Parties have reached agreement on the form of production for documents produced electronically or inform the Court of the Parties' disagreements regarding electronic production.

SIGNED this 19th day of April, 2007.

___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-8 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 31

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/19/2007

Page 1 of 6 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. § § § § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-223(TJW)

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL.

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.

§ § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-224(TJW)

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.

§ § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-369(TJW)

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. COMCAST CORPORATION, ET AL.

§ § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-506(TJW)

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL.

§ § § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-507(TJW)

DOCKET CONTROL ORDER

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-8 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 31

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/19/2007

Page 2 of 6 Page 2 of 6

Monday, August 4, 2008

Jury Selection - 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas for the initial case to be tried.

July 24, 2008

Pretrial Conference - 9:30 a.m. in Marshall, Texas

July 21, 2008

Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury Instructions and Form of the Verdict.

July 21, 2008

Motions in Limine (due three days before final Pre-Trial Conference). Three (3) days prior to the pre-trial conference provided for herein, the parties shall furnish a copy of their respective Motions in Limine to the Court by facsimile transmission, 903/935-2295. The parties are directed to confer and advise the Court on or before 3:00 o'clock p.m. the day before the pre-trial conference which paragraphs are agreed to and those that need to be addressed at the pre-trial conference. The parties shall limit their motions in limine to those issues which, if improperly introduced into the trial of the cause, would be so prejudicial that the Court could not alleviate the prejudice with appropriate instruction(s). Response to Dispositive Motions (including Daubert motions) Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting of Court Proceedings. If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court proceedings is requested for trial, the party or parties making said request shall file a notice with the Court and e-mail the Court Reporter, Susan Simmons, at [email protected]. For Filing Dispositive Motions and any other motions that may require a hearing (including Daubert motions) Responses to dispositive motions filed prior to the dispositive motion deadline, including Daubert Motions, shall be due in accordance with Local Rule CV-7(e). Motions for Summary Judgment shall comply with Local Rule CV56. 2

July 14, 2008

July 7, 2008

June 27, 2008

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-8 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 31

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/19/2007

Page 3 of 6 Page 3 of 6

May 28, 2008

Defendants to Identify Trial Witnesses

May 14, 2008

Plaintiff to Identify Trial Witnesses

May 14, 2008

Discovery Deadline

April 15, 2008

Conference to determine the case that will be tried August 4, 2008, the order in which the remainder of the cases will be tried and, if possible, a trial setting for the remaining cases.

April 7, 2008

or 30 Days after the claim construction ruling, whichever occurs later, Designate Rebuttal Expert Witnesses other than claims construction Expert witness report due Refer to Discovery Order for required information.

April 3, 2008

Status Report to Court in lieu of mediation

_________________

15 Days after claim construction ruling Comply with P.R. 3-8.

March 24, 2008

or 15 Days after claim construction ruling, whichever occurs later, Party with the burden of proof to designate Expert Witnesses other than claims construction Expert witness report due Refer to Discovery Order for required information.

February 13 and 14, 2008

Claim construction hearing or hearings 9:00 a.m., Marshall, Texas. Parties submit technology tutorials to the Court.

February 1, 2008

3

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-8 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 31

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/19/2007

Page 4 of 6 Page 4 of 6

January 21, 2008

Comply with P.R. 4-5(c).

January 11, 2008

Comply with P.R. 4-5(b).

December 24, 2007

Comply with P.R. 4-5(a).

December 7, 2007

Discovery deadline-claims construction issues

November 30, 2007

Respond to Amended Pleadings

November 16, 2007

Amend Pleadings (It is not necessary to file a Motion for Leave to Amend before the deadline to amend pleadings except to the extent the amendment seeks to add a new patent in suit. It is necessary to file a Motion for Leave to Amend after November 16, 2007).

November 16, 2007

Comply with P.R. 4-3.

October 16, 2007

Comply with P.R. 4-2.

September 26, 2007

Comply with P.R. 4-1.

August 3, 2007

Letter to the Court stating that there are no disputes as to claims of privileged documents.

June 11, 2007

Comply with Paragraph 3(b) of the Discovery Order

June 4, 2007

Privilege Logs to be exchanged by parties

June 11, 2007

Comply with P.R. 3-3. 4

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-8 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 31

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/19/2007

Page 5 of 6 Page 5 of 6

May 3, 2007

Join Additional Parties

April 28, 2007

Comply with P.R. 3-1

April 3, 2007

Scheduling Conference (All attorneys are directed to Local Rule CV-16 for scope of the Scheduling Conference).

The parties are directed to Local Rule CV-7(d), which provides in part that "[i]n the event a party fails to oppose a motion in the manner prescribed herein the court will assume that the party has no opposition." Local Rule CV-7(e) provides that a party opposing a motion has 12 days, in addition to any added time permitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e), in which to serve and file a response and any supporting documents, after which the court will consider the submitted motion for decision.

OTHER LIMITATIONS 1. All depositions to be read into evidence as part of the parties'case-in-chief shall be EDITED so as to exclude all unnecessary, repetitious, and irrelevant testimony; ONLY those portions which are relevant to the issues in controversy shall be read into evidence. The Court will refuse to entertain any motion to compel discovery filed after the date of this Order unless the movant advises the Court within the body of the motion that counsel for the parties have first conferred in a good faith attempt to resolve the matter. See Eastern District of Texas Local Rule CV-7(h). The following excuses will not warrant a continuance nor justify a failure to comply with the discovery deadline: (a) The fact that there are motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss pending; The fact that one or more of the attorneys is set for trial in another court on the same day, unless the other setting was made prior to the date of this order or was made as a special provision for the parties in the other case; The failure to complete discovery prior to trial, unless the parties can 5

2.

3.

(b)

(c)

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-8 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 31

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/19/2007

Page 6 of 6 Page 6 of 6

demonstrate that it was impossible to complete discovery despite their good faith effort to do so.

SIGNED this 19th day of April, 2007.

___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-9 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 1 of 10 Filed 04/24/2007 Page of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP § § V. § § CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL. § § REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP § § V. § § TIME WARNER CABLE, INC. § § REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP § § V. § § TIME WARNER CABLE, INC. § § REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP § § V. § § COMCAST CORPORATION, ET AL. § § REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP § § V. § § CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL. § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-223(TJW)

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-224(TJW)

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-369(TJW)

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-506(TJW)

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-507(TJW)

NOTICE REGARDING THE PROTECTIVE ORDER At the Scheduling Conference, the Parties requested an additional three weeks to work on reaching an agreement with respect to a Protective Order in this case. In its April 19, 2007 Order Regarding Protective Order and Document Production (Doc. No. 68), the Court gave the parties

Dallas 237130v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-9 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 2 of 10 Filed 04/24/2007 Page of 10

three weeks to reach agreement on a Protective Order or inform the Court of any remaining disputes regarding the Protective Order. The Parties have reached agreement on a Protective Order and respectfully request that the Court enter the agreed upon Protective Order, which is attached hereto as Attachment A. DATED: April 24, 2007 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Sam Baxter Sam Baxter State Bar No. 01938000 McKOOL SMITH, P.C. 505 E. Travis, Suite 105 Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: (903) 927-2111 Telecopier: (903) 927-2622 [email protected] Jeffrey A. Carter State Bar No. 03919400 McKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4006 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 [email protected] Travis Gordon White State Bar No. 21333000 McKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 W. 6th Street, Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 692-8700 Telecopier: (512) 692-8744 [email protected]

Dallas 237130v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-9 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 3 3 of 10 Filed 04/24/2007 Page of 10

/s/ Brooke A. M. Taylor Max L. Tribble, Jr. State Bar No. 20213950 Tibor L. Nagy State Bar 24041562 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, TX 77002 Tel: 713-651-9366 Fax: 713-654-6666 OF COUNSEL: Edgar Sargent WA State Bar No. 28283 Email: [email protected] SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101-3000 Tel: 206-516-3880 Fax: 206-516-3883 Brooke A.M. Taylor WA State Bar No. 33190 Email: [email protected] SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101-3000 Tel: 206-516-3880 Fax: 206-516-3883 Robert M. Parker State Bar No. 15498000 Robert Christopher Bunt State Bar No. 00787165 PARKER & BUNT, P.C. 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 531-3535 Telecopier: (903) 533-9687 [email protected] [email protected]

Dallas 237130v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-9 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 4 4 of 10 Filed 04/24/2007 Page of 10

Otis Carroll State Bar No. 03895700 Patrick Kelley State Bar No. 11202500 IRELAND, CARROLL & KELLEY, P.C. 6101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75703 Telephone: (903) 561-1600 Telecopier: (903) 581-1071 [email protected] Calvin Capshaw State Bar No. 03783900 Andrew W. Spangler State Bar No. 24041960 BROWN McCARROLL LLP 1127 Judson Road, Suite 220 P.O. Box 3999 (75606-3999) Longview, Texas 75601-5157 Telephone: (903) 236-9800 Telecopier: (903) 236-8787 [email protected] [email protected] Franklin Jones, Jr. State Bar No. 00000055 JONES & JONES, INC. 201 W. Houston Street P. O. Drawer 1249 Marshall, TX 75670 Telephone: 903-938-4395 Telecopier: 903-938-3360 [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP

Dallas 237130v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-9 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 5 5 of 10 Filed 04/24/2007 Page of 10

/s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 Diane DeVasto POTTER MINTON, P.C. A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 (75702) P. O. Box 359 Tyler, Texas 75710 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Telecopier: (903) 593-0846 [email protected] David S. Benyacar Michael A. Rogoloff KAYE SCHOLER 425 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Tel: 212-836-8000 Fax: 212-836-8689 [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT TIME WARNER CABLE INC.

Dallas 237130v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-9 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 6 6 of 10 Filed 04/24/2007 Page of 10

/s/ Jennifer Haltom Doan Jennifer Haltom Doan Texas Bar No. 08809050 John Peyton Perkins, III Texas Bar No. 24043457 HALTOM & DOAN, LLP 6500 N. Summerhill Road, Suite 1A P. O. Box 6227 Texarkana, TX 75505-6227 Tel: 903-255-1000 Fax: 903-255-0800 Brian Ferral Leo Lam Asim M. Bhansali Matthias A. Kamber KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 9411-1704 Tel: 415-676-2235 Fax: 415-397-7188 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST CABLE, COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, and COMCAST OF PLANO, LP

Dallas 237130v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-9 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 7 7 of 10 Filed 04/24/2007 Page of 10

/s/ Michael E. Jones Bradford P. Lyerla, Attorney in Charge [email protected] Kevin D. Hogg [email protected] William J. Kramer [email protected] Paul B. Stephens [email protected] MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6357 Tel: 312-474-6300 Fax: 312-474-0448 Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 POTTER MINTON, PC 110 North College 500 Plaza Tower Tyler, TX 75702 Tel: 903-597-8311 Fax: 903-593-0846 [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC

Dallas 237130v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-9 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 8 8 of 10 Filed 04/24/2007 Page of 10

/s/ Michael E. Jones Mitchell G. Stockwell Lead Attorney Georgia Bar No. 682912 KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP 1100 Peachtree Street NE Suite 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309-4530 Tel: 404-815-6214 Fax: 404-815-6555 Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 [email protected] Allen F. Gardner State Bar No. 24043679 [email protected] POTTER MINTON, P.C. A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 (75702) P. O. Box 359 Tyler, TX 75710 Tel: 903-597-8311 Fax: 903-593-0846 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT COXCOM, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by U.S. mail, on this the 24th day of April 2007. /s/ Sam Baxter Sam Baxter

Dallas 237130v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-9 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 9 9 of 10 Filed 04/24/2007 Page of 10

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by U.S. mail, on this the 24th day of April 2007. /s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor Brooke A.M. Taylor

Dallas 237130v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-9 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 10 of 10 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 10 of 10

Attachment A

Dallas 237130v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 1 of 22 Page 1 of 22

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP

§ § V. § § CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL. § § REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP § § V. § § TIME WARNER CABLE, INC. § § REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP § § V. § § TIME WARNER CABLE, INC. § § REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP § § V. § § COMCAST CORPORATION, ET AL. § § REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP § § V. § § CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL. § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-223(TJW)

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-224(TJW)

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-369(TJW)

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-506(TJW)

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-507(TJW)

PROTECTIVE ORDER WHEREAS, Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Rembrandt"), and Defendants Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Operating, LLC (collectively, "Charter"), and CoxCom, Inc. ("CoxCom") in the 223 and 507 cases, Defendants Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner Cable LLC, Time Warner New York Cable LLC, Time Warner

1
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 2 of 22 Page 2 of 22

Entertainment Company, L.P., and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership (collectively, "Time Warner") in the 224 and 369 cases, and Defendants Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, and Comcast of Plano LP (collectively, "Comcast") in the 506 case, through counsel, stipulate to entry of this Protective Order ("Order") in their respective case or cases pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) to prevent unnecessary disclosure or dissemination of confidential information; and WHEREAS, Rembrandt, Charter, CoxCom, Time Warner, and Comcast are collectively referred to herein as the "parties;" and WHEREAS, the parties recognize that confidential information is being produced for use in this civil action; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions of this Order shall govern the treatment of confidential information produced by a party ("Producing Party")1 to any other party ("Receiving Party") in the course of this civil action: 1. The term "Confidential Information" as used in this Order includes all

information and tangible things that constitute or disclose trade secrets or other confidentia1 or proprietary information of one of the parties. Confidential Information may be contained in discovery information or materials produced or obtained in this action by or through any means and by or through any person or entity. The Confidential Information contained therein and all copies, recordings, abstracts, excerpts, analyses or other writings that contain, reveal or otherwise disclose such Confidential Information shall also be deemed Confidential Information.

The parties agree that all references to "Producing Party" in this Protective Order be construed to include third parties producing documents in one or more of these cases.

1

2
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 3 of 22 Page 3 of 22

2.

Confidential Information shall be disclosed, disseminated and used by the

Receiving Party only for purposes of litigation between the parties to this action. Except with the prior written consent of the Producing Party or upon prior order of this Court, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed except in accordance with the terms, conditions, and restrictions of this Order 3. Produced documents, interrogatory responses, responses to requests for admission

and other documents containing "Confidential Information" shall be marked by conspicuously affixing a legend, which includes the words "CONFIDENTIAL," or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL--ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY", as appropriate, on each page containing Confidential Information at the time such documents are produced or such information is disclosed (or on the cover or container of computer storage media, such as discs or tapes). The parties may designate material other than the produced documents as containing Confidential Information in the following manner: (a) Testimony or information disclosed at a deposition that contains

Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information may be designated by indicating on the record at the deposition the portions of the testimony which contain such information that is to be made subject to the provisions of this Order. Alternatively, a Producing Party may designate testimony or information disclosed at a deposition, including exhibits, that contains Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information by notifying all parties in writing, within fifteen (15) days after the Producing Party's receipt of the transcript, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that contain such information. Whether or not designation is made at the time of a deposition, accessibility to each transcript (and the information contained therein) of any deposition in its entirety shall be limited to outside counsel of record and designated in-

3
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 4 of 22 Page 4 of 22

house counsel only, from the taking of the deposition until fifteen (15) days after the actual receipt of the transcript by the Producing Party, or until receipt of the notice referred to in this paragraph, whichever occurs sooner. At the expiration of the said fifteen (15) day period, unless notice hereunder to the contrary is given at the time of the deposition or prior to the expiration of said period, the entire transcript shall be deemed non-confidential. (b) Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information contained in

any affidavits, briefs, memoranda or other papers filed with the Court in this action may be designated as Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information by indicating on the face of such documents that one or more parties considers them to contain such information. 4. The parties may designate as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL--ATTORNEYS' EYES

ONLY any materials that qualify for protection under the standards developed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and which comprises (a) technical information that the producing party reasonably deems highly confidential, including but not limited to proprietary technical information and trade secrets; or (b) business or financial information that the producing party reasonably deems highly confidential, such as, for example, business plans or forecasts, cost or pricing information, sales volume or revenue information, profit margin information, marketing plans or strategy, the identity of current or potential customers or suppliers, accounting information not of public record, information subject to a confidentiality agreement with a third party, or the like. The foregoing categories are by way of example only and shall not limit the categories of information a party may designate HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL--ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY under this order; provided, however, that any such designation must be made by the producing party in good faith and with reasonable justification. Subject to the provisions of paragraphs 6 and 7 herein, material designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL--ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY,

4
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 5 of 22 Page 5 of 22

and any summary, description or report of the information contained in such materials, may be disclosed only to the following persons: (a) the Court, persons employed by the Court, and stenographers transcribing

the testimony or argument at a hearing, trial or deposition in this action or any appeal therefrom; (b) technical and damages consultants and experts who are not current

employees of any party in this matter and who have been retained by counsel to provide assistance in this action, with disclosure only to the extent necessary to perform such work; (c) graphics, translation, design and/or trial consulting services, including

mock jurors, retained by a party; (d) source code escrow agents, photocopy, document imaging and database

services, and consultants retained by counsel to set up, maintain and/or operate computer systems, litigation databases or to convert data for inclusion in such databases; (e) John Meli, Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Rembrandt,

Andrew T. Block, Esq. of Time Warner, Kirill Y. Abramov, Esq. of Charter, Marcus Delgado, Esq. of CoxCom and David Marcus, Esq. of Comcast; and two (2) paralegals and/or clerical employees assisting each of the identified in-house counsel; and (f) the parties' outside counsel of record in this action as specifically set forth

below and any other counsel for a party that appears in this action, and their paralegal assistants, law clerks, stenographic and clerical employees who are assisting in the prosecution, defense and/or appeal of this action. Any individual outside counsel of record who receives information designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL--ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY may not participate in patent prosecution for the Receiving Party, and the individual outside counsel who receives any

5
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 6 of 22 Page 6 of 22

such information may not discuss the information with anyone involved in patent prosecution for the Receiving Party. Outside counsel of record for the parties are as follows: For Rembrandt in the 223 case: McKool Smith P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Parker & Bunt 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Jones & Jones, Inc., P.C. 201 West Houston St., Drawer 1249 Marshall, Texas 75671-1249 For Rembrandt in the 224 case: McKool Smith P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Parker & Bunt 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Ireland, Carroll & Kelly, P.C. 61101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75703 Brown McCarroll LLP 1127 Judson Road, Suite 220 P.O. Box 3999 (75606-3999) Longview, Texas 75601-5157 For Rembrandt in the 369 Case: Susman Godfrey LLP 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, TX 77002-5096 Parker & Bunt 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 6
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 7 of 22 Page 7 of 22

Ireland, Carroll & Kelly, P.C. 61101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75703 Brown McCarroll LLP 1127 Judson Road, Suite 220 P.O. Box 3999 (75606-3999) Longview, Texas 75601-5157 For Rembrandt in the 506 Case: Susman Godfrey LLP 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, TX 77002-5096 Ireland, Carroll & Kelly, P.C. 61101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75703 Jones & Jones, Inc., P.C. 201 West Houston St., Drawer 1249 Marshall, Texas 75671-1249 Brown McCarroll LLP 1127 Judson Road, Suite 220 P.O. Box 3999 (75606-3999) Longview, Texas 75601-5157 Parker & Bunt 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 For Rembrandt in the 507 Case: Susman Godfrey LLP 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, TX 77002-5096 Parker & Bunt 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Jones & Jones, Inc., P.C. 201 West Houston St., Drawer 1249 Marshall, Texas 75671-1249 7
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 8 of 22 Page 8 of 22

For Charter in the 223 and 507 cases: Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606-6357 Potter Minton, PC 1100 North College 500 Plaza Tower Tyler, Texas 75702 For Coxcom in the 223 and 507 cases: Kilpatrick Stockton LLP 1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2800 Atlanta, Georgia 30309-4530 Potter Minton, PC 1100 North College 500 Plaza Tower Tyler, Texas 75702 For Time Warner in the 224 and 369 cases: Kaye Scholer LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Potter Minton, PC 1100 North College 500 Plaza Tower Tyler, Texas 75702 For Comcast in the 506 case: Keker & Van Nest, LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, California 94111-1704 Halton & Doan, LLP 6500 N. Summerhill Road, Suite 1A P.O. Box 6227 Texarkana, Texas 75505-6277

8
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 9 of 22 Page 9 of 22

Gillam & Smith LLP 303 South Washington Avenue Marshall, TX 75670

5.

The parties may designate as CONFIDENTIAL any materials that qualify for

protection under the standards developed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). Subject to the provisions of paragraphs 6 and 7 herein, material designated as CONFIDENTIAL, and any summary, description or report of the information contained in such materials, may be disclosed only to the following persons: (a) the Court, persons employed by the Court, and stenographers transcribing

the testimony or argument at a hearing, trial or deposition in this action or any appeal therefrom; (b) technical and damages consultants and experts who are not current

employees of any party in this matter and who have been retained by counsel to provide assistance in this action, with disclosure only to the extent necessary to perform such work; (c) graphics, translation, design and/or trial consulting services, including

mock jurors, retained by a party; (d) photocopy, document imaging and database services and consultants

retained by counsel to set up, maintain and/or operate computer systems, litigation databases or to convert data for inclusion in such databases; (e) John Meli, and Paul Schneck, Chief Executive Officer of Rembrandt,

Andrew T. Block, Esq. of Time Warner, Kirill Y. Abramov, Esq. of Charter, Marcus Delgado, Esq. of CoxCom and David Marcus, Esq. of Comcast and one other employee for each of Charter, CoxCom, Time Warner, and Comcast (following identification of each other employee

9
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 10 of 22 Page 10 of 22

to each of the other parties and approval by the other parties, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld); and two (2) clerical employees assisting each party's in-house counsel and other employee; and (f) the parties' outside counsel of record in this action and any other counsel

for a party that appears in this action, and their paralegal assistants, law clerks, stenographic and clerical employees who are assisting in the prosecution, defense and/or appeal of this action 6. (a) A party may exclude from a deposition any person who is not entitled to

view Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information when such information is the subject of examination. (b) No Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information shall be

revealed or disclosed, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, to any individual described in subparagraphs 4(b)-(e) and 5(b)-(e) until that individual has been given a copy of this Order and has duly completed and signed an undertaking in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, the original of which shall be retained, until the conclusion of this action including all appeals, by counsel for each party who intends to or does disclose to such individual any Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information. (c) Before individuals under subparagraphs 4(b) and 5(b) may have access to

Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information, the Receiving Party must submit to the Producing Party the individual's signed undertaking as well as the individual's curriculum vitae setting forth his or her name, address, qualifications and relevant work experience, including, but not limited to, the identity of any company in the telecommunications industry for whom said individual has consulted or worked during the last five (5) years. If the Producing Party does not object in writing, within five (5) business days from receipt of the undertaking, 10
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 11 of 22 Page 11 of 22

Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information may then be disclosed to the retained consultant or former employee. If timely objection is made, the parties shall attempt in good faith to resolve the disclosure issue. If the issue cannot be resolved, the Producing Party has fifteen (15) days from receipt of the undertaking to bring a motion to preclude the retained consultant or former employee from viewing the Producing Party's Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information. If the Producing Party does not bring such a timely motion, Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information may be disclosed to the retained consultant or former employee. (d) Pursuant to subparagraph 6(c), the disclosure of the identity of a

consulting expert will not be a waiver of any privilege or right to withhold from production that applies to communications or work product. Furthermore, the parties agree that by stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order; the parties do not intend to modify in any way the normal discovery rules applicable to consulting experts, or other agreements reached between the parties regarding such discovery. 7. In addition to the terms set forth in paragraphs 4 through 6 herein governing the

disclosure of Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information, information or materials that contain, embody, or otherwise reflect source code of a party or a third party subpoenaed for such source code in one or more of the above captioned cases shall be provided the following further protections: (a) Any and all such source code, except for hard (non-electronic) copies,

shall be stored and viewed only at the offices of one (1) agreed-upon source code custodian ("Source Code Custodian"). The source code shall initially be deposited at a facility in the Los Angeles metropolitan region. After 45 days, the source code shall be transferred to a facility in 11
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 12 of 22 Page 12 of 22

the Dallas metropolitan region. Where source code is deposited by a third party, this subparagraph may be modified by written agreement of the parties and the third party depositing source code; in all other cases, this subparagraph may be modified by written agreement of the parties. (b) Subject to subparagraphs (c) and (d), any source code produced in

electronic form shall be stored and viewed only at the offices of the Source Code Custodian and shall be maintained in a secured, locked area. No electronic copies of source code shall be made. Any such source code shall only be viewed or analyzed on a stand-alone computer (a computer that is not connected to any internal or external computer or computer network) located within the above-described locations. The Source Code Custodian shall maintain a Source Code Access Log identifying, for each and every time any source code is viewed, accessed or analyzed: (1) the name of each person who accessed the code; (2) the date and time of access; (3) the length of time of access; and (4) whether any hard (non-electronic) copies of any portion of the code were copied and the portion of the code copied. The Receiving Party reviewing source code shall be allowed to make hard (non-electronic) copies of material that they, in good faith, consider relevant. The parties shall negotiate reasonable limitations on the amount of source code that is released by Producing Party at any given time. (c) Any hard (non-electronic) copies of source code shall be stored and

viewed only within the United States at: (i) a secured, locked area in one of the offices of the Source Code

Custodian, each such location within the United States, provided the hard (non-electronic) copies are marked with the designation "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL--ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY"; (ii) the Court; 12
Dallas 236804v1

Case 2:06-cv-00506-TJW-CE Document 49-10 Case 1:07-cv-00403-GMS Document 32-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 04/24/2007

Page 13 of 22 Page 13 of 22

(iii) (iv)

the site where any deposition relating to the source code is taken; any intermediate location reasonably necessary to transport the

information (e.g., a hotel prior to the deposition.) (d) For each and every hard (non-electronic) copy of any source code, or any

portion of any source code, the Source Code Custodian shall maintain a log detailing the location of the copy. Excessive reproduction of source code should be avo