Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 43.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 619 Words, 3,946 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/191960/9.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of California ( 43.9 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of California
Case 5:07-cv-02523-RS

Document 9

Filed 09/17/2007

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Rebecca Connolly, Esq., SBN 145482 GRUNSKY, EBEY, FARRAR & HOWELL A Professional Corporation 240 Westgate Drive Watsonville, CA 95076 Phone: (831)722-2444; Fax: (831)722-6153 Attorneys for Defendant ED GUZMAN, individually and dba CLUB ED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

DYLAN GREINER, individually and dba SANTA CRUZ SURF SCHOOL; ALIJAH K. CROWELL; DAVID M. AVARY; Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF SANTA CRUZ; OFFICER JOHN ALEXIOU; DANETTEE SHOEMAKER; CAROL SCURICH; JOHN BARISONE; ED GUZMAN, individually and dba CLUB ED; and DOES ONE THROUGH TEN, Defendants

CASE 06 6417 VRW No. C NO.C 07-2523 RS

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT & CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [proposed] ORDER The Honorable Richard Seeborg

On August 8, 2007, this Court granted the parties stipulation to extend the time to respond to the complaint and the case management conference date. Due to the death of a close friend, plaintiffs' counsel has requested an additional two weeks to evaluate whether or not her clients will be filing an amended complaint. Accordingly, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate that all served defendants shall have until October 10, 2007 to answer or otherwise respond to the above-captioned complaint. Plaintiffs' counsel has represented that prior to such date, but in no event later than September 28, 2007, plaintiffs' counsel will be filing an amended complaint. If no amended complaint is filed by September 28, 2007, defendants will file their responsive pleading on or before October 10, 2007. -1GUZE19446\stip-extend-2.doc

Dylan Greiner, et al. v. City of Santa Cruz, et al. Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint & Continue CMC

C 07-2523 RS

Case 5:07-cv-02523-RS

Document 9

Filed 09/17/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Based on this stipulated continuance with respect to the responsive pleading, the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for November 28, 2007 is premature and the parties stipulate to continue the Case Management Conference to December 12, 2007. The parties further stipulate that the deadline to exchange initial disclosures will be December 12, 2007. IT IS SO STIPULATED: DATED: 9/17/07 By DATED: 9/17/07 By /s/ Barbara H. Choi, Attorneys for Defendants City of Santa Cruz, Officer John Alexiou; Danettee Shoemaker; Carol Scurich; John Barisone GRUNSKY, EBEY, FARRAR & HOWELL /s/ Rebecca Connolly, Attorneys for Defendant Ed Guzman /s/ Kate Wells, Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED:

9/17/07 By

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Case Management Conference currently scheduled for November 28, 2007 is continued to December 12, 2007 at 2:30 p.m. The defendants shall have until October 10, 2007 to file their responsive pleading.

DATED: ____________________

_______________________________________ Richard Seeborg United States Magistrate Judge

-2GUZE19446\stip-extend-2.doc

Dylan Greiner, et al. v. City of Santa Cruz, et al. Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint & Continue CMC

C 07-2523 RS

Case 5:07-cv-02523-RS

Document 9

Filed 09/17/2007

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Rebecca Connolly, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 17th day of September, 2007, at Watsonville, California.

By:

/s/ Rebecca Connolly

-3GUZE19446\stip-extend-2.doc

Dylan Greiner, et al. v. City of Santa Cruz, et al. Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint & Continue CMC

C 07-2523 RS