Free Declaration in Support - District Court of California - California

Case 4:07-cv—O3010-CW Document 25 Filed O7/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
l JAMES POOLEY (CA SBN 58041)
SCOTT OLIVER (CA SBN 174824)
2 DIANA LUO (CA SBN 233712)
KATHERINE NOLAN-STEVAUX (CA SBN 244950)
3 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
755 Page Mill Road
4 Palo Alto, California 94304-1018
Telephone: 650.8l3.5600
5 Facsimile: 650.494.0792
[email protected]
6 [email protected]
[email protected]
7 [email protected]
8 Attorneys for Plaintiff
OPTOVUE CORPORATION
9
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 1 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 OAKLAND DIVISION
13
14 OPTOVUE CORPORATION, a California Case No. C 07-03010 CW
Corporation,
15 DECLARATION OF DIANA LUO
Plaintiff, IN SUPPORT OF OPTOVUE
16 CORPORATION’S OPPOSITION
v. TO CARL ZEIS MEDITEC, INC.’S
17 MOTION TO DISMISS
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC., a New York
18 Corporation, Date: August 23, 2007
Time: 2:00 p.m.
19 Defendant. Ctrm: 2 — 4th Floor
20 The Honorable Claudia Wilken
21
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC.,
22
Counterclaimant,
23
v.
24
OPTOVUE CORPORATION, INC.; JAY WEI,
25 and individual, and YONGHUA ZHAO, an
individual,
26
Counterdefendants.
27
28
Luo oiaci. iso OPTOVUE’S OPPOSITION TO czivrs Motion to oisivuss
CAsE No. C 07-03010 CW
pa-1182407

Case 4:07-cv—O3010-CW Document 25 Filed O7/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
1 I, Diana Luo, declare and state as follows:
2 I am an attorney in the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel of record for
3 Plaintiff Optovue Corporation ("Optovue") in the above-referenced matter. I have personal
4 knowledge of all the facts contained herein and, if called to testify, could and would competently
5 testify thereto.
6 1. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Fujitsu Ltcl v. Nanya
7 Technology Corp., No. C 06-6613 CW, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44386 (N.D. Cal. June 6, 2007).
8 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Prospect Planet, L.L.C. v.
9 PaychecksforLy’e.com, No. A3-02-91, 2003 U.S. Dist. Lexis 835 (D.N.D. Jan. 16, 2003).
10 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of Application Science &
1 1 Technology, LLC v. Statmon Technologies Corp., 05-C-6864, 2006 WL 1430215, 05-C—6864,
12 2006 WL 1430215 (N.D. Ill. April 21, 2006).
13 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of a letter (without
14 attachments) from Yar Chaikovsky to Jay Wei, dated October 18, 2006.
15 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of Gladwell Governmental
16 Services, Inc. v. County ofMarin, C-04-3332 SBA, 2005 U.S. Dist. Lexis 42276 (ND. Cal. Oct.
17 17, 2005).
18 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of Bolton v. Actuant Corp., No.
19 03-08184 Pa(CWx), 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 15192 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2004).
20 7. I understand that Optovue’s principal place of business is Fremont, California, and
21 that CZM’s principal place of business is Dublin, California.
22
23 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
24 Executed on July 26, 2007 at Palo Alto, California.
25 Q Q ` 2
26 D` A na Luo
27
28
Luo oper. iso oprovuE’s opposition ro czrvrs Motion TO oisivuss 1
CAsp No. C 07-03010 CW
pa-1 182407

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW

Document 25

Filed 07/26/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW

Document 25

Filed 07/26/2007

Page 2 of 2