Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 156.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: September 5, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 741 Words, 4,785 Characters
Page Size: 617 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/193002/32.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 156.7 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 4:07-cv—O3010-CW Document 32 Filed O9/O5/2007 Page 1 of 3
I JAMES POOLEY #058041
L. SCOTT OLIVER #174824
2 DIANA LUO #233712
KATHERINE NOLAN-STEVAUX # 244950
3 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
755 Page Mill Road
4 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018
Telephone: (650) 813-5600
5 Facsimile: (650) 494-0792
[email protected] ·
6 soliver@ mofo.com
[email protected]
7 [email protected]
3 Attorneys for Plaintiff
OPTOVUE CORPORATION and
9 Counterdeiendants OPTOVUE CORPORATION,
JAY VVEI and YONGHUA ZHAO
10
DONALD L. BARTELS #65142
ll BRUCE E. COPELAND #124888
LAURA K. CARTER #244956
12 NIXON PEABODY LLP
One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor
13 San Francisco, CA 94111-3600
Telephone: (415) 984-8200
14 Facsimile: (415) 984-8300
[email protected]
15 [email protected]
[email protected]
16
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
17 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC.
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
OAKLAND DIVISION
21 OPTOVUE CORPORATION, a California Case No. C 07-03010 CW
Corporation,
22 STIPULATION AND
Plaintiff, ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT
23 CONFERENCE DATE
v.
24 JUDGE: HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, TNC., a New York
25 Corporation,
26 Defendant.
27
AND RELATED COUNTERACTION.
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE Com‘1NuANCE or CASE SCHEDULE
CASE No. C 07-03010 CW

Case 4:07-cv—O3010-CW Document 32 Filed O9/O5/2007 Page 2 of 3
1 Plaintiff Optovue Corporation and Counterdefendants Optovue Corporation, Jay Wei
2 and Yonghua Zhao (collectively as “Optovue") and Defendant and Counterclaimant, Carl
3 Zeiss Meditec, Inc. ("CZM") hereby stipulate as follows:
4 WHEREAS, on August 20, 2007, the Court ordered the Case Management
5 Conference to be continued to October 25, 2007;
6 WHEREAS, counsel for Optovue promptly notified counsel for CZM that Optovue’s
7 lead counsel is not available on October 25, 2007, and requested to reschedule the Case
8 Management Conference for October 1 lthg
9 WHEREAS, on August 24, 2007, counsel for CZM informed counsel for Optovue
1() that CZM is amenable to reschedule the Case Management Conference for October 1 lth,
1 1 insofar as CZM’s motion to dismiss, if any, with respect to Optovue’s amended complaint,
12 can also be noticed for October 1 lth;
13 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, and through their
14 respective attomeys of record, as follows:
15
16 Event Current Date Proposed Date
17 Optovue to file amended complaint September 4, 2007 August 28, 2007
18
CMZ to tile any motion to dismiss September 18, 2007 September10, 2007
19 amended complaint, if necessary
20 Last day to meet and confer rc ADR August 30, 2007 September 20, 2007
21 g§§;gi(?§g;V§A€O;?O§l§O September 4, 2007 September 20, 2007
22 Dismiss Amended Complaint
23 Last day to tile joint ADR
Certification or Notice of Need for August 3O’ 2007 September 20’ 2007
24 Conference
25 Last day to file reply brief in
support of any Motion to Dismiss September 11, 2007 September 27’ 2007
26 Amended Complaint
27 Last day to complete initial September 13, 2007 October 4, 2007
28 disclosures or state objections
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE Comrmiimce or criss Scmsouuz 2
CASE NO. C 07-03010 CW _

Case 4:07-cv—O3010-CW Document 32 Filed O9/O5/2007 Page 3 of 3
I Event Current Date Proposed Date
2
Last day to tile Joint Case October 25, 2007 October 4, 2007
3 Management Statement
4 Last day IO me Rule 266) Report September 13, 2007 October 4, 2007
5 Case Management Conference — October 25, 2007 October ll, 2007
2:00 n.m. — Courtroom 2
6 AND MOTION TO _
DISMISS, IF FILED.
7 Respectfully submitted,
8
9 Dated: August 22 , 2007 Dated: August 2 jf , 2007
li) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP NIXON PEABODY LLP
L,-—»-# ·
11 BY ?‘>
12 JAMES POOLEY DONALD L. BARTELS
L. SCOTT OLIVER BRUCE E. COPELAND
13 DIANA LUO LAURA K. CARTER
KATHERINE NOLAN—STEVAUX
14 Attorneys for Defendant and
Attorneys for Plaintiff Counterclaimant
I5 OPTOVUE CORPORATION and CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC.
Counterdefendants OPTOVUE
16 CORPORATION, JAY WEI and
YONGHUA ZHAO
l7
18
lg oRDER
20 IT IS SO ORDERED.
Z1 9/5
22 Dated: Arug-u-st , 2007 ·
\
24 CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge U
25
26
27 pa-I190l47
28 I
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CoNTmuANcE on CASE SCHEDULE 3
CASE No. C 07-03010 CW _

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW

Document 32

Filed 09/05/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW

Document 32

Filed 09/05/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW

Document 32

Filed 09/05/2007

Page 3 of 3

AND MOTION TO DISMISS, IF FILED.

9/5