Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :06-cv—00275-GIVIS Document 55 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
I I I H I Reed Smith LLP
1201 Market Street
Suite 1500
Thad J_ Bracegirdlg Wllmlngton,
Direct Phone: z02.77e.r5r1 302-778-7500
Email: [email protected] Fax 302-778-7575
A September 20, 2007 `
VIA CM/ECF
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
844 North King Street, Lock Box 19
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Robert D. Christ v. Brettl Cormick, et al., C.A. No. 06-275-GMS
Dear Judge Sleet:
In Section II.B. of their reply memorandum filed yesterday (D.I. 54), defendants Brett Cormick
and Elan Suisse Intemational Holdings (USA) LLC addressed the choice of law to be applied to
defendants’ counterclaim for breach of contract. In that section, defendants state that plaintiff Robert
Christ "did not respond to this argument, and so appears to concede the point." (D.I. 54 at p. 8). I write
simply to inform the Court and defendants’ cotmsel that Mr. Christ argued the applicability of Delaware
law to defendants’ breach of contract claim at pages 11-12 of his answering brief (D.I. 53). I _
respectfully apologize to the Court for any confusion this may have caused. I I _
Respectfully, `
sttuogg AQWKLQ
Thad J. Bracegirdle
A (Del. Bar No. 3691)
` cc: Clerk of the Court (via CM/ECE)
·e » David L. Finger, Esquire (via CM/ECF)
NEW YORK • LONDON O LOS ANGELES • PARIS • SAN FRANCISCO • WASHINGTON, D.C. • PHILADELPHIA • PITTSBURGH • OAKLAND
MUNICH • PRINCETON • NORTHERN VIRGINIA • WILMINGTON • NEWARK • MIDLANDS, U.K. • CENTURY CITY 0 RICHMOND
reedsmIth.com
WILLIB-55630.1